2011 summary compensation
table
The table below shows the
compensation of the companys chief executive officer, chief financial officer
and each of the other three most highly compensated individuals who were
executive officers during 2011 (collectively called the named executive
officers) for services in all capacities to the company in 2011. For a
discussion of the amount of a named executive officers salary and bonus in
proportion to his total compensation, please see the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis on pages 68-78.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
Non-qualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
Incentive Plan |
|
Deferred |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
| Name and
Principal |
|
|
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
| Position |
|
Year |
|
($) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($)(3) |
|
($)(4) |
|
($)(5) |
|
Earnings
($)(6) |
|
($)(7) |
|
Total ($) |
| Richard K. Templeton |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
990,087 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,194,500 |
|
$ |
4,689,075 |
|
$ |
2,778,118 |
|
$ |
149,704 |
|
|
$ |
254,283 |
|
|
$ |
14,055,767 |
| Chairman, President |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
987,840 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,149,000 |
|
$ |
3,566,066 |
|
$ |
3,171,094 |
|
$ |
98,899 |
|
|
$ |
240,521 |
|
|
$ |
12,213,420 |
| & Chief Executive
Officer |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
963,120 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,311,231 |
|
$ |
3,608,023 |
|
$ |
1,788,084 |
|
$ |
49,566 |
|
|
$ |
145,633 |
|
|
$ |
9,865,657 |
| |
| Kevin P. March |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
562,091 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,587,231 |
|
$ |
1,432,773 |
|
$ |
919,349 |
|
$ |
896,326 |
|
|
$ |
39,925 |
|
|
$ |
5,437,695 |
| Senior Vice President |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
524,587 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,238,961 |
|
$ |
1,064,867 |
|
$ |
1,065,858 |
|
$ |
558,705 |
|
|
$ |
19,995 |
|
|
$ |
4,472,973 |
| & Chief Financial
Officer |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
465,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
946,843 |
|
$ |
1,031,700 |
|
$ |
605,458 |
|
$ |
327,928 |
|
|
$ |
20,646 |
|
|
$ |
3,397,575 |
| |
| Gregg A. Lowe |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
597,917 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,135,528 |
|
$ |
1,927,731 |
|
$ |
1,272,176 |
|
$ |
1,029,655 |
|
|
$ |
10,313 |
|
|
$ |
6,973,320 |
| Senior Vice President |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
571,672 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,132,148 |
|
$ |
1,832,561 |
|
$ |
1,449,014 |
|
$ |
596,660 |
|
|
$ |
15,927 |
|
|
$ |
6,597,982 |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
535,020 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,395,343 |
|
$ |
1,520,400 |
|
$ |
810,044 |
|
$ |
378,384 |
|
|
$ |
15,693 |
|
|
$ |
4,654,884 |
| |
| Kevin J. Ritchie |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
543,385 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,875,803 |
|
$ |
1,693,277 |
|
$ |
1,042,873 |
|
$ |
1,143,408 |
|
|
$ |
13,855 |
|
|
$ |
6,312,601 |
| Senior Vice President |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
468,540 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,440,648 |
|
$ |
1,238,217 |
|
$ |
1,181,151 |
|
$ |
630,532 |
|
|
$ |
13,520 |
|
|
$ |
4,972,608 |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
448,080 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,245,843 |
|
$ |
1,357,500 |
|
$ |
629,349 |
|
$ |
418,897 |
|
|
$ |
11,506 |
|
|
$ |
4,111,175 |
| |
| Brian T. Crutcher (1) |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
480,007 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,875,803 |
|
$ |
1,693,277 |
|
$ |
962,873 |
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
49,540 |
|
|
$ |
5,062,196 |
| Senior Vice President |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
360,903 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,650,500 |
|
$ |
990,574 |
|
$ |
812,508 |
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
30,468 |
|
|
$ |
5,845,355 |
| (1) |
|
Mr. Crutcher
became an executive officer in 2010. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Performance
bonuses for 2011 were paid under the Texas Instruments Executive Officer
Performance Plan. In accordance with SEC requirements, these amounts are
reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
column. |
| |
| (3) |
|
Shown is the
aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock unit (RSU) awards
calculated in accordance with ASC 718. The discussion of the assumptions
used for purposes of the valuation of the awards granted in 2011 appears
in note 5 of Exhibit 13 to TIs annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2011. For a description of the grant terms, please see
pages 84-85. The discussion of the assumptions used for purposes of the
valuation of the awards granted in 2010 and 2009 appears respectively in
Exhibit 13 to TIs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010 (pages 11-14), and to TIs annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 (pages 12-15). |
| |
| (4) |
|
Shown is the
aggregate grant date fair value of options calculated in accordance with
ASC 718. The discussion of the assumptions used for purposes of the
valuation of options granted in 2011 appears in note 5 of Exhibit 13 to
TIs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. For
a description of the grant terms, please see page 84. The discussion of the
assumptions used for purposes of the valuation of the awards granted in
2010 and 2009 appears respectively in Exhibit 13 to TIs annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (pages 11-14), and to TIs
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (pages
12-15). |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
2012
PROXY STATEMENT n 79 |
| (5) |
|
Consists of
performance bonus and profit sharing for 2011. Please see page 75 of the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the amounts of bonus and profit
sharing paid to each of the named executive officers for
2011. |
| |
| (6) |
|
The company does
not pay above-market earnings on deferred compensation. Therefore, no
amounts are reported in this column for deferred compensation. The amounts
in this column represent the change in the actuarial value of the named
executive officers benefits under the qualified defined benefit pension
plan (TI Employees Pension Plan) and the non-qualified defined benefit
pension plans (TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan and TI Employees
Non-Qualified Pension Plan II) from December 31, 2010, through December
31, 2011. This change in the actuarial value is the difference between
the 2010 and 2011 present value of the pension benefit accumulated as of
year-end by the named executive officer, assuming that benefit is not paid
until age 65. Mr. Templetons and Mr. Crutchers benefits under the
companys pension plans were frozen as of December 31, 1997. |
| |
| (7) |
|
In the interest
of transparency, the value of perquisites and other personal benefits is
provided in this column even if the amount is less than the reporting
threshold established by the SEC. The table below shows the value of
perquisites and other benefits for 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution |
|
Unused |
|
Personal Use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) |
|
Retirement |
|
Vacation |
|
of Company |
|
Financial |
|
Executive |
| Name |
|
Insurance |
|
Contribution |
|
Plan (a) |
|
Time (b) |
|
Aircraft (c) |
|
Counseling |
|
Physical |
| R. K. Templeton |
|
$250 |
|
$ |
9,800 |
|
|
$ |
86,502 |
|
|
$ |
26,275 |
|
$ |
123,456 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| K. P.
March |
|
$250 |
|
$ |
4,900 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
31,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
2,499 |
|
| G. A. Lowe |
|
$250 |
|
$ |
4,900 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
| K. J.
Ritchie |
|
$250 |
|
$ |
4,900 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
7,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
| B. T. Crutcher |
|
$250 |
|
$ |
9,800 |
|
|
$ |
32,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,641 |
|
|
$ |
2,781 |
|
| (a) |
|
Consists of (i)
contributions under the companys enhanced defined contribution retirement
plan of $4,900, and (ii) an additional amount of $81,602 for Mr. Templeton
and $27,168 for Mr. Crutcher accrued by TI to offset IRC limitations on
amounts that could be contributed to the enhanced defined contribution
retirement plan, which amount is also shown in the Non-qualified Deferred
Compensation table on page 87. |
| |
| (b) |
|
Represents
payments for unused vacation time that could not be carried
forward. |
| |
| (c) |
|
The board of
directors has determined that for security reasons, it is in TIs interest
to require the chief executive officer to use the company aircraft for
personal air travel. The amount shown for Mr. Templeton is the incremental
cost of his personal use of aircraft. We valued this incremental cost
using a method that takes into account: landing, parking and flight
planning services expenses; crew travel expenses; supplies and catering
expenses; aircraft fuel and oil expenses per hour of flight;
communications costs; a portion of ongoing maintenance; and any customs,
foreign permit and similar fees. Because company aircraft are primarily
used for business travel, this methodology excludes the fixed costs, which
do not change based on usage, such as pilots salaries and the lease cost
of the company aircraft. |
| 80 n 2012 PROXY STATEMENT |
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
Grants of plan-based awards in
2011
The following table shows the grants
of plan-based awards to the named executive officers in 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Awards: |
|
or Base |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts |
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Price of |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
under Non-Equity Incentive |
|
under Equity Incentive |
|
Shares of |
|
Securities |
|
Option |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|
Plan
Awards |
|
Plan
Awards |
|
Stock or |
|
Underlying |
|
Awards |
|
of Stock |
|
|
Grant |
|
Committee |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Units |
|
Options |
|
($/Sh) |
|
and Option |
| Name |
|
Date |
|
Action |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
(#)(2) |
|
(#)(3) |
|
(4) |
|
Awards
(5) |
| R. K. Templeton |
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
* |
|
* |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
$ |
4,689,075 |
|
|
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,194,500 |
|
| K. P.
March |
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
* |
|
* |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,500 |
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
$ |
1,432,773 |
|
|
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,587,231 |
|
| G. A. Lowe |
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
* |
|
* |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
$ |
1,927,731 |
|
|
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,135,528 |
|
| K. J.
Ritchie |
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
* |
|
* |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,500 |
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
$ |
1,693,277 |
|
|
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,875,803 |
|
| B. T. Crutcher |
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
* |
|
* |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,500 |
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
$ |
1,693,277 |
|
|
|
1/27/11 (1) |
|
1/20/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,875,803 |
|
| * |
|
TI did
not use formulas or pre-set thresholds or multiples to determine incentive
awards. Under the terms of the Executive Officer Performance Plan, each
named executive officer is eligible to receive a cash bonus equal to 0.5
percent of the companys consolidated income (as defined in the plan).
However, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to set bonuses at a
lower level if it decides it is appropriate to do so. The committee
decided to do so for 2011. |
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
In accordance
with the grant policy of the Compensation Committee of the board
(described on page 76), the grants became effective on the third trading
day after the company released its financial results for the fourth
quarter and year 2010. The company released these results on January 24,
2011. |
| |
| (2) |
|
The stock awards
granted to the named executive officers in 2011 were RSU awards. These
awards were made under the companys 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. For
information on the terms and conditions of these RSU awards, please see
the discussion beginning on page 84. |
| |
| (3) |
|
The options were
granted under the companys 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. For information
on the terms and conditions of these options, please see the discussion on
page 84. |
| |
| (4) |
|
The exercise
price of the options is the closing price of TI common stock on January
27, 2011. |
| |
| (5) |
|
Shown is the
aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718 for
stock and option awards in 2011. The discussion of the assumptions used
for purposes of the valuation appears in note 5 of Exhibit 13 to TIs
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011. |
None of
the options or other equity awards granted to the named executive officers was
repriced or modified by the company.
For additional information regarding
TIs equity compensation grant practices, please see the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis on pages 70, 72-73 and 76.
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
2012
PROXY STATEMENT n 81 |
Outstanding equity awards at
fiscal year-end 2011
The following table shows the
outstanding equity awards for each of the named executive officers as of
December 31, 2011.
|
|
Option
Awards |
|
Stock
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Market or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
Payout Value |
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
Shares, |
|
of Unearned |
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
of Shares or |
|
Units or |
|
Shares, Units |
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
Units of Stock |
|
Other |
|
or Other |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
Option |
|
Units of Stock |
|
That Have Not |
|
Rights That |
|
Rights That |
|
|
Options (#) |
|
Options (#) |
|
Unearned |
|
Exercise |
|
Expiration |
|
That Have Not |
|
Vested |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
| Name |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Options (#) |
|
Price ($) |
|
Date |
|
Vested (#) |
|
($)(1) |
|
Vested (#) |
|
Vested
($) |
| R. K. Templeton |
|
|
|
450,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
|
1/27/2021 |
|
150,000 |
(6) |
|
$ |
4,366,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
405,000 |
(3) |
|
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
|
1/28/2020 |
|
180,000 |
(7) |
|
$ |
5,239,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332,230 |
|
332,231 |
(4) |
|
|
|
$ |
14.95 |
|
|
1/29/2019 |
|
221,487 |
(8) |
|
$ |
6,447,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,500 |
|
67,500 |
(5) |
|
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
1/25/2018 |
|
150,000 |
(9) |
|
$ |
4,366,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.32 |
|
|
1/18/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.55 |
|
|
1/19/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.55 |
|
|
1/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.39 |
|
|
1/14/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16.25 |
|
|
2/20/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16.11 |
|
|
1/15/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| K. P. March |
|
|
|
137,500 |
(2) |
|
|
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
|
1/27/2021 |
|
45,834 |
(6) |
|
$ |
1,334,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,312 |
|
120,938 |
(3) |
|
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
|
1/28/2020 |
|
53,751 |
(7) |
|
$ |
1,564,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
95,000 |
(4) |
|
|
|
$ |
14.95 |
|
|
1/29/2019 |
|
63,334 |
(8) |
|
$ |
1,843,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,750 |
|
21,250 |
(5) |
|
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
1/25/2018 |
|
35,000 |
(9) |
|
$ |
1,018,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.32 |
|
|
1/18/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.55 |
|
|
1/19/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.55 |
|
|
1/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.39 |
|
|
1/14/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| G. A. Lowe |
|
|
|
185,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
|
1/27/2021 |
|
61,667 |
(6) |
|
$ |
1,795,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,375 |
|
208,125 |
(3) |
|
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
|
1/28/2020 |
|
92,501 |
(7) |
|
$ |
2,692,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
140,000 |
(4) |
|
|
|
$ |
14.95 |
|
|
1/29/2019 |
|
93,334 |
(8) |
|
$ |
2,716,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
25,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
1/25/2018 |
|
60,000 |
(9) |
|
$ |
1,746,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.32 |
|
|
1/18/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.55 |
|
|
1/19/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.55 |
|
|
1/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.39 |
|
|
1/14/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 82 n 2012 PROXY STATEMENT |
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
Outstanding equity awards at
fiscal year-end 2011 (contd)
|
|
Option
Awards |
|
Stock
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Market or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
Payout Value |
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
Shares, |
|
of Unearned |
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
of Shares or |
|
Units or |
|
Shares, Units |
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
Units of Stock |
|
Other |
|
or Other |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
Option |
|
Units of Stock |
|
That Have Not |
|
Rights That |
|
Rights That |
|
|
Options (#) |
|
Options (#) |
|
Unearned |
|
Exercise |
|
Expiration |
|
That Have Not |
|
Vested |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
| Name |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Options (#) |
|
Price ($) |
|
Date |
|
Vested (#) |
|
($)(1) |
|
Vested (#) |
|
Vested
($) |
| K. J. Ritchie |
|
|
|
162,500 |
(2) |
|
|
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
|
1/27/2021 |
|
54,167 |
(6) |
|
$ |
1,576,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,875 |
|
140,625 |
(3) |
|
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
|
1/28/2020 |
|
62,501 |
(7) |
|
$ |
1,819,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
125,000 |
(4) |
|
|
|
$ |
14.95 |
|
|
1/29/2019 |
|
83,334 |
(8) |
|
$ |
2,425,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
25,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
1/25/2018 |
|
50,000 |
(9) |
|
$ |
1,455,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.32 |
|
|
1/18/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.55 |
|
|
1/19/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.55 |
|
|
1/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.39 |
|
|
1/14/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29.19 |
|
|
2/21/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| B. T. Crutcher |
|
|
|
162,500 |
(2) |
|
|
|
$ |
34.63 |
|
|
1/27/2021 |
|
54,167 |
(6) |
|
$ |
1,576,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
112,500 |
(3) |
|
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
|
1/28/2020 |
|
50,000 |
(7) |
|
$ |
1,455,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
(4) |
|
|
|
$ |
14.95 |
|
|
1/29/2019 |
|
33,334 |
(8) |
|
$ |
970,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
7,500 |
(5) |
|
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
1/25/2018 |
|
20,000 |
(9) |
|
$ |
582,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.32 |
|
|
1/18/2017 |
|
100,000 |
(10) |
|
$ |
2,911,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.55 |
|
|
1/19/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
Calculated by
multiplying the number of RSUs by the closing price of TIs common stock
on December 31, 2011 ($29.11). |
| |
| (2) |
|
One-quarter of
the shares became exercisable on January 27, 2012, and one-third of the
remaining shares become exercisable on each of January 27, 2013, January
27, 2014, and January 27, 2015. |
| |
| (3) |
|
One-third of the
shares became exercisable on January 28, 2012, and one-half of the
remaining shares become exercisable on each of January 28, 2013, and
January 28, 2014. |
| |
| (4) |
|
One-half of the
shares became exercisable on January 29, 2012, and the remaining one-half
become exercisable on January 29, 2013. |
| |
| (5) |
|
Became fully
exercisable on January 25, 2012. |
| |
| (6) |
|
Vesting date is
January 30, 2015. |
| |
| (7) |
|
Vesting date is
January 31, 2014. |
| |
| (8) |
|
Vesting date is
January 31, 2013. |
| |
| (9) |
|
Vested on January
31, 2012. |
| |
| (10) |
|
Vesting date is
October 31, 2014. |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
2012
PROXY STATEMENT n 83 |
The Option Awards shown in the table
above are non-qualified stock options, each of which represents the right to
purchase shares of TI common stock at the stated exercise price. For grants
before 2007, the exercise price is the average of the high and low price of TI
common stock on the grant date. For grants after 2006, the exercise price is the
closing price of TI common stock on the grant date. The term of each option is
10 years unless the option is terminated earlier pursuant to provisions
summarized in the chart below and in the paragraph following the chart. Options
vest (become exercisable) in increments of 25 percent per year beginning on the
first anniversary of the date of the grant. The chart below shows the
termination provisions relating to outstanding stock options as of December 31,
2011. The Compensation Committee of the board of directors established these
termination provisions to promote employee retention while offering competitive
terms.
|
Employment |
Employment Termination |
|
|
| Employment |
Termination (at Least |
(at Least 6 Months after Grant) |
|
Other |
| Termination Due to |
6 Months after Grant) |
with 20 Years of Credited |
Employment |
Circumstances |
| Death or Permanent |
When Retirement |
Service, but Not Retirement |
Termination for |
of Employment |
| Disability |
Eligible |
Eligible |
Cause |
Termination |
Vesting continues;
option remains in
effect to end of
term |
|
Vesting continues;
option
remains in effect to end
of term |
|
Option remains in effect to the
end of
the term; for options granted on or after
February 20, 2003,
vesting does not
continue after employment termination |
|
|
Option remains
exercisable
for
30 days |
|
Options may be cancelled if the
grantee competes with TI during the two years after employment termination or
discloses TI trade secrets. In addition, for options received while the grantee
was an executive officer, the company may reclaim (or clawback) profits earned
under grants if the officer engages in such conduct. These provisions are
intended to strengthen retention and provide a reasonable remedy to TI in case
of competition or disclosure of our confidential
information.
Options granted after 2009 become fully vested if the grantee is
involuntarily terminated from employment with TI (other than for cause) within
24 months after a change in control of TI. Change in control is defined as
provided in the Texas Instruments 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan and occurs upon
(1) acquisition of more than 50 percent of the voting stock or at least 80
percent of the assets of TI or (2) change of a majority of the board of
directors in a 12-month period unless a majority of the directors then in office
endorsed the appointment or election of the new directors (Plan definition).
These terms are intended to reduce employee uncertainty and distraction in the
period leading up to a change in control, if such an event were to occur. For
options granted before 2010, the stock option terms provide that upon a change
in control of TI, the option becomes fully vested to the extent it is then
outstanding; and if employment termination (except for cause) has occurred
within 30 days before the change in control, the change in control is deemed to
have occurred first. Change in control is defined in these pre-2010 options as
(1) acquisition of 20 percent of TI common stock other than through a
transaction approved by the board of directors, or (2) change of a majority of
the board of directors in a 24-month period unless a majority of the directors
then in office have elected or nominated the new directors (together, the
pre-2010 definition).
The Stock Awards in the table of
outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2011 are RSU awards. Each RSU
represents the right to receive one share of TI common stock on a stated date
(the vesting date) unless the award is terminated earlier under terms
summarized below. In general, the vesting date is approximately four years after
the grant date. Each RSU includes the right to receive dividend equivalents,
which are paid annually in cash at a rate equal to the amount paid to
stockholders in dividends. The table below shows the termination provisions of
outstanding RSUs as of December 31, 2011.
| |
|
|
|
Other Circumstances |
| Employment Termination |
|
Employment Termination |
|
of Employment |
| Due to Death or Permanent
Disability |
|
When Retirement
Eligible |
|
Termination |
| Vesting continues; shares are paid at
the scheduled vesting date |
|
Grant stays in effect and pays out
shares at the scheduled vesting date. Number of shares reduced according
to the duration of employment over the vesting period* |
|
Grant cancels; no shares are
issued |
| * |
|
Calculated by
multiplying the number of RSUs by a fraction equal to the number of whole
365-day periods from the grant date to the employment termination date (or
first day of any bridge leave of absence leading to retirement), divided
by the number years in the vesting period. |
These termination provisions are
intended to promote retention. All RSU awards contain cancellation and clawback
provisions like those described above for stock options. For awards granted
after 2009, the terms provide that, to the extent permitted by Section 409A of
the IRC, the award vests upon involuntary termination of TI employment within 24
months after a change in control. Change in control is the Plan definition. The
terms of earlier RSU awards provide for full vesting of the award upon a change
in control of TI. Change in control is the pre-2010 definition unless the grant
is subject to Section 409A, in which event the definition under Section 409A
applies. Section 409A defines a change in control as a change in the ownership
or effective control of a corporation or a change in the ownership of a
substantial portion of the assets of a corporation. These cancellation, clawback
and change-in-control terms are intended to conform RSU terms with those of
stock options (to the extent permitted by the IRC) and to achieve the objectives
described above in the discussion of stock options.
| 84 n 2012 PROXY STATEMENT |
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
In
addition to the Stock Awards shown in the outstanding equity awards at fiscal
year-end 2011 table above, Mr. Templeton holds an award of RSUs that was granted
in 1995. The award, for 120,000 shares of TI common stock, vested in 2000. Under
the award terms, the shares will be issued to Mr. Templeton in March of the year
after his termination of employment for any reason. These terms were designed to
provide a tax benefit to the company by postponing the related compensation
expense until it was likely to be fully deductible. In accordance with SEC
requirements, this award is reflected in the 2011 non-qualified deferred
compensation table on page 87.
2011 option exercises and stock
vested
The following table lists the number
of shares acquired and the value realized as a result of option exercises by the
named executive officers in 2011 and the value of any RSUs that vested in
2011.
|
Option
Awards |
|
Stock
Awards |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired |
|
Value Realized |
|
Shares Acquired |
|
Value Realized |
| Name |
on Exercise
(#) |
|
on Exercise
($) |
|
on Vesting
(#) |
|
on Vesting
($) |
| R. K. Templeton |
|
835,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,198,050 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,140,500 |
|
| K. P.
March |
|
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,703,400 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,199,450 |
|
| G. A. Lowe |
|
70,000 |
|
|
$ |
310,800 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,056,200 |
|
| K. J.
Ritchie |
|
165,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,318,250 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,713,500 |
|
| B. T. Crutcher |
|
103,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,351,328 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
342,700 |
|
2011 pension
benefits
The following table shows the present
value as of December 31, 2011, of the benefit of the named executive officers
under our qualified defined benefit pension plan (TI Employees Pension Plan) and
non-qualified defined benefit pension plans (TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension
Plan (which governs amounts earned before 2005) and TI Employees Non-Qualified
Pension Plan II (which governs amounts earned after 2004)). In accordance with
SEC requirements, the amounts shown in the table do not reflect any named
executive officers retirement eligibility or any increase in benefits that may
result from the named executive officers continued employment after December
31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present |
|
During |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Value of |
|
Last |
|
|
|
Years Credited |
|
Accumulated |
|
Fiscal |
| Name |
Plan Name |
|
Service (#) |
|
Benefit
($)(5) |
|
Year ($) |
| R. K. Templeton (1) |
TI Employees Pension Plan |
|
16 |
(2) |
|
|
$ |
496,801 |
|
|
|
|
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan |
|
16 |
(2) |
|
|
$ |
336,814 |
|
|
|
|
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II |
|
16 |
(4) |
|
|
$ |
31,029 |
|
|
|
| |
| K. P. March |
TI Employees Pension Plan |
|
26 |
(2) |
|
|
$ |
573,462 |
|
|
|
|
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan |
|
19 |
(3) |
|
|
$ |
202,132 |
|
|
|
|
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II |
|
26 |
(4) |
|
|
$ |
2,388,487 |
|
|
|
| |
| G. A. Lowe |
TI Employees Pension Plan |
|
26 |
(2) |
|
|
$ |
576,809 |
|
|
|
|
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan |
|
19 |
(3) |
|
|
$ |
305,673 |
|
|
|
|
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II |
|
26 |
(4) |
|
|
$ |
2,639,864 |
|
|
|
| |
| K. J. Ritchie |
TI Employees Pension Plan |
|
32 |
(2) |
|
|
$ |
931,854 |
|
|
|
|
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan |
|
25 |
(3) |
|
|
$ |
397,733 |
|
|
|
|
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan II |
|
32 |
(4) |
|
|
$ |
3,187,035 |
|
|
|
| |
| B. T. Crutcher (1) |
TI Employees Pension Plan |
|
0.9 |
(2) |
|
|
$ |
2,929 |
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
In 1997, TIs
U.S. employees were given the choice between continuing to participate in
the defined benefit pension plans or participating in a new enhanced
defined contribution retirement plan. Messrs. Templeton and Crutcher chose
to participate in the defined contribution plan. Accordingly, their
accrued pension benefits under the qualified and non-qualified plans were
frozen (i.e., they will experience no increase attributable to years of
service or change in eligible earnings) as of December 31, 1997.
Contributions to the defined contribution plan for Mr. Templetons and Mr.
Crutchers benefits are included in the 2011 summary compensation
table. |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
2012
PROXY STATEMENT n 85 |
| (2) |
|
For each of the
named executive officers, credited service began on the date the officer
became eligible to participate in the plan. For Mr. Crutcher, eligibility
to participate began on the first day of the month following completion of
one year of employment. For each of the other named executive officers,
eligibility to participate began on the earlier of 18 months of
employment, or January 1 following the completion of one year of
employment. Accordingly, each of the named executive officers has been
employed by TI for longer than the years of credited service shown
above. |
| |
| (3) |
|
Credited service
began on the date the named executive officer became eligible to
participate in the TI Employees Pension Plan as described in note 2 above
and ceased at December 31, 2004. |
| |
| (4) |
|
Credited service
began on the date the named executive officer became eligible to
participate in the TI Employees Pension Plan as described in note 2
above. |
| |
| (5) |
|
The assumptions
and valuation methods used to calculate the present value of the
accumulated pension benefits shown are the same as those used by TI for
financial reporting purposes and are described in note 12 in Exhibit 13 to
TIs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,
except that a named executive officers retirement is assumed (in
accordance with SEC rules) for purposes of this table to occur at age 65
and no assumption for termination prior to that date is used. The amount
of the lump sum benefit earned as of December 31, 2011, is determined
using either (i) the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) interest
assumption of 3.00 percent or (ii) the Pension Protection Act of 2006
(PPA) corporate bond yield interest assumption of 4.92 percent for the TI
Employees Pension Plan and 4.91 percent for the TI Employees Non-Qualified
Pension Plans, whichever rate produces the higher lump sum amount. A
discount rate assumption of 4.92 percent for the TI Employees Pension Plan
and 4.91 percent for the non-qualified pension plans was used to determine
the present value of each lump sum. |
TI Employees Pension
Plan
The TI Employees Pension Plan is
a qualified defined benefit pension plan. Please see page 77 under the Benefits
heading of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of the
origin and purpose of the plan. Employees who joined the U.S. payroll after
November 30, 1997, are not eligible to participate in this
plan.
A
plan participant is eligible for normal retirement under the terms of the plan
if he is at least 65 years of age with one year of credited service. A
participant is eligible for early retirement if he is at least 55 years of age
with 20 years of employment or 60 years of age with five years of employment.
Mr. Ritchie is the only named executive officer who is currently eligible for
early or normal retirement.
A participant may request payment of his accrued benefit at termination
or any time thereafter. Participants may choose a lump sum payment or one of six
forms of annuity. In order of largest to smallest periodic payment, the forms of
annuity are: (i) single life annuity, (ii) 5-year certain and life annuity,
(iii) 10-year certain and life annuity, (iv) qualified joint and 50 percent
survivor annuity, (v) qualified joint and 75 percent survivor annuity, and (vi)
qualified joint and 100 percent survivor annuity. If the participant does not
request payment, he will begin to receive his benefit in April of the year after
he reaches the age of 70½ in the form of annuity required under the
IRC.
The pension formula for the qualified plan is intended to provide a
participant with an annual retirement benefit equal to 1.5 percent multiplied by
the product of (i) years of credited service and (ii) the average of the five
highest consecutive years of his base salary plus bonus up to a limit imposed by
the IRS, less a percentage (based on his year of birth, when he elects to retire
and his years of service with TI) of the amount of compensation on which his
Social Security benefit is based.
If an individual takes early retirement and chooses to begin receiving
his annual retirement benefit at that time, such benefit is reduced by an early
retirement factor. As a result, the annual benefit is lower than the one he
would have received at age 65.
If the participants employment terminates due to disability, the
participant may choose to receive his accrued benefit at any time prior to age
65. Alternatively, the participant may choose to defer receipt of the accrued
benefit until reaching age 65 and then take a disability benefit. The disability
benefit paid at age 65 is based on salary and bonus, years of credited service
the participant would have accrued to age 65 had he not become disabled and
disabled status.
The benefit payable in the event of death is based on salary and bonus,
years of credited service and age at the time of death, and may be in the form
of a lump sum or annuity at the election of the beneficiary. The earliest date
of payment is the first day of the second calendar month following the month of
death.
Leaves of absence, including a bridge to retirement, are credited to
years of service under the qualified pension plan. Please see the discussion of
leaves of absence on page 92 below.
TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension
Plans
TI has two non-qualified
pension plans: the TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension Plan (Plan I), which
governs amounts earned before 2005; and the TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension
Plan II (Plan II), which governs amounts earned after 2004. Each is a
non-qualified defined benefit pension plan. Please see page 77 under the
Benefits heading of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
the purpose of the plans. As with the qualified defined benefit pension plan,
employees who joined the U.S. payroll after November 30, 1997, are not eligible
to participate in Plan I or Plan II. Eligibility for normal and early retirement
under these plans is the same as under the qualified plan (please see above).
Benefits are paid in a lump sum.
| 86 n 2012 PROXY STATEMENT |
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
A
participants benefits under Plan I and Plan II are calculated using the same
formula as described above for the TI Employees Pension Plan. However, the IRS
limit on the amount of compensation on which a qualified pension benefit may be
calculated does not apply. Additionally, the IRS limit on the amount of
qualified benefit the participant may receive does not apply to these plans.
Once this non-qualified benefit amount has been determined using the formula
described above, the individuals qualified benefit is subtracted from it. The
resulting difference is multiplied by an age-based factor to obtain the amount
of the lump sum benefit payable to an individual under the non-qualified
plans.
Amounts under Plan I will be distributed when payment of the
participants benefit under the qualified pension plan commences. Amounts under
Plan II will be distributed subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the
IRC. Because the named executive officers are among the 50 most highly
compensated officers of the company, Section 409A of the IRC requires that they
not receive any lump sum distribution payment under Plan II before the first day
of the seventh month following termination of employment.
If a participant terminates due to disability, amounts
under Plan I will be distributed when payment of the participants benefit under
the qualified plan commences. For amounts under Plan II, distribution is
governed by Section 409A of the IRC, and the disability benefit is reduced to
reflect the payment of the benefit prior to age 65.
In the event of death, payment under both plans is based
on salary and bonus, years of credited service and age at the time of death and
will be in the form of a lump sum. The earliest date of payment is the first day
of the second calendar month following the month of death.
Balances in the plans are unsecured obligations of the
company. For amounts under Plan I, in the event of a change in control, the
present value of the individuals benefit would be paid not later than the month
following the month in which the change in control occurred. For such amounts,
the pre-2010 definition of a change in control (please see page 84) applies. For
all amounts accrued under this plan, if a sale of substantially all of the
assets of the company occurred, the present value of the individuals benefit
would be distributed in a lump sum as soon as reasonably practicable following
the sale of assets. For amounts under Plan II, no distribution of benefits is
triggered by a change in control.
Leaves
of absence, including a bridge to retirement, are credited to years of service
under the non-qualified pension plans. For a discussion of leaves of absence, please see
page 92 below.
TI Employees Survivor Benefit
Plan
TIs qualified and non-qualified
pension plans provide that upon the death of a retirement-eligible employee, the
employees beneficiary receives a payment equal to half of the benefit to which
the employee would have been entitled under the pension plans had he retired
instead of died. We have a survivor benefit plan that pays the beneficiary a
lump sum that, when added to the reduced amounts the beneficiary receives under
the pension plans, equals the benefit the employee would have been entitled to
receive had he retired instead of died. Because Mr. Ritchie became eligible for
early retirement in August 2011, his beneficiary would be eligible for a benefit
under the survivor benefit plan if he were to die under those
circumstances.
2011 non-qualified deferred
compensation
The following table shows
contributions to the named executive officers deferred compensation account in
2011 and the aggregate amount of his deferred compensation as of December 31,
2011.
|
|
Executive |
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Contributions |
|
Contributions in |
|
Aggregate Earnings in |
|
Withdrawals/ |
|
Balance at Last |
| Name |
|
in Last FY
($) |
|
Last FY
($)(2) |
|
Last FY ($) |
|
Distributions
($) |
|
FYE ($)(5) |
| R. K. Templeton |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,602 |
|
|
$ |
(349,055 |
)
(3) |
|
|
$ |
67,200 |
(4) |
|
$ |
4,918,712 |
(6) |
| K. P.
March |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
$ |
92,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
| G. A. Lowe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
841,741 |
|
| K. J.
Ritchie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
|
$ |
81,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
| B. T. Crutcher |
|
$ |
50,454 |
(1) |
|
$ |
27,168 |
|
|
$ |
(2,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
234,306 |
|
| (1) |
|
Amount shown is a portion of
Mr. Crutchers profit sharing for 2010, which was paid in
2011. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Company matching
contributions pursuant to the defined contribution plan. These amounts are
included in the All Other Compensation column of the 2011 summary
compensation table on page 79. |
| |
| (3) |
|
Consists of: (a) $67,200 in
dividend equivalents paid under the 120,000-share 1995 RSU award discussed
on page 85, settlement of which has been deferred until after termination
of employment; (b) a $406,800 decrease in the value of the RSU award
(calculated by subtracting $3,900,000 (the value of the award at year-end
2010) from $3,493,200 (the value of the award at year-end 2011) (in both
cases, the number of RSUs is multiplied by the closing price of TI common
stock on the last trading date of the year)); and (c) a $9,455 loss in Mr.
Templetons deferred compensation account in 2011. Dividend equivalents
are paid at the same rate as dividends on the companys common
stock. |
| |
| (4) |
|
Dividend equivalents paid on
the RSUs discussed in note 3. |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
2012
PROXY STATEMENT n
87 |
| (5) |
|
Includes amounts
reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the current or prior-year
proxy statements as follows: Mr. Templeton, $2,479,013; Mr. Lowe,
$935,466; and Mr. Crutcher, $102,737. |
| |
| (6) |
|
Of this amount,
$3,493,200 is attributable to Mr. Templetons 1995 RSU award, calculated
as described in note 3. The remainder is the balance of his deferred
compensation account. |
Please see page 77 under the Benefits
heading of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of the
purpose of the plan. An employees deferred compensation account contains
eligible compensation the employee has elected to defer and contributions by the
company that are in excess of the IRS limits on (i) contributions the company
may make to the enhanced defined contribution plan and (ii) matching
contributions the company may make related to compensation the executive officer
deferred into his deferred compensation
account.
Participants in the deferred compensation plan may choose to defer up to
(i) 25 percent of their base salary, (ii) 90 percent of their performance bonus,
and (iii) 90 percent of profit sharing. Elections to defer compensation must be
made in the calendar year prior to the year in which the compensation will be
earned.
The company has determined that the investment alternatives for deferred
compensation balances should generally be the same as the investment
alternatives available under the companys defined contribution plan. These
investment alternatives may be changed at any time. During 2011, participants
could choose to have their deferred compensation mirror the performance of one
or more of the following mutual funds, each of which is managed by a third party
(these alternatives are a subset of those offered to participants in the defined
contribution plans): Northern Trust Short Term Investment Fund, Northern Trust
Daily Aggregate Bond Fund Index, Northern Trust Russell 1000 Value Equity Index,
Northern Trust Russell 1000 Growth Equity Index, Northern Trust Russell 2000
Equity Index, Northern Trust S&P 400 Index Fund, Fidelity Puritan Fund,
BlackRock Equity Index Fund, BlackRock (EAFE) (Europe, Australia, Far East)
Equity Index Fund, BlackRock Lifepath Index 2020 Fund, BlackRock Lifepath Index
2030 Fund, BlackRock Lifepath Index 2040 Fund, BlackRock Lifepath Index 2050
Fund and the BlackRock Lifepath Index Retirement Fund. From among the available
investment alternatives, participants may change their instructions relating to
their deferred compensation daily. Earnings on a participants balance are
determined solely by the performance of the investments that the participant has
chosen for his plan balance. The company does not guarantee any minimum return
on investments. A third party administers the companys deferred compensation
program.
A participant may request distribution from the plan in the case of an
unforeseeable emergency. To obtain an unforeseeable emergency withdrawal, a
participant must meet the requirements of Section 409A of the IRC. Otherwise, a
participants balance is paid pursuant to his distribution election and is
subject to applicable IRC limitations.
Amounts contributed by the company, and amounts earned and deferred by
the participant for which there is a valid distribution election on file, will
be distributed in accordance with the participants election. Annually
participants may elect separate distribution dates for deferred compensation
attributable to a participants (i) bonus and profit sharing and (ii) salary.
Participants may elect that these distributions be in the form of a lump sum or
annual installments to be paid out over a period of five or ten consecutive
years. Amounts for which no valid distribution election is on file will be
distributed three years from the date of deferral.
In the event of the participants death, the earliest
date of payment is the first day of the second calendar month following the
month of death.
Like the balances under the non-qualified defined benefit pension plans,
deferred compensation balances are unsecured obligations of the company. For
amounts earned and deferred prior to 2010, a change in control does not trigger
a distribution under the plan. For amounts earned and deferred after 2009,
distribution occurs, to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the IRC, if the
participant is involuntarily terminated within 24 months after a change in
control. Change in control is the Plan definition.
Potential payments upon
termination or change in control
None of the named executive officers
has an employment contract with the company. They are eligible for benefits on
generally the same terms as other U.S. employees upon termination of employment
or change in control of the company. TI does not reimburse executive officers
for any income or excise taxes that are payable by the executive as a result of
payments relating to termination or change in control.
Termination
The following programs may result in payments to a named
executive officer whose employment terminates. Most of these programs have been
discussed above in the proxy statement. For a discussion of the impact of these
programs on the compensation decisions for 2011, please see the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis on page 78.
Bonus. Our policies concerning bonus and the timing of payments
are described on page 70. Whether a bonus would be awarded, and in what amount,
to an executive officer whose employment has terminated would depend on the
circumstances of termination. It may be presumed that no bonus would be awarded
in the event of a termination for cause. If awarded, bonuses are paid by the
company.
| 88 n 2012 PROXY STATEMENT |
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
Qualified and non-qualified
defined benefit pension plans. The
purposes of these plans are described on page 77. The formula for determining
benefits, the forms of benefit and the timing of payments are described on pages
85-87. The amounts disbursed under the qualified and non-qualified plans are
paid, respectively, by the TI Employees Pension Trust and the
company.
Survivor benefit plan. The purpose of this plan is described on
page 87. The formula for determining the amount of benefit, the form of benefit
and the timing of payments are described on page 87. Amounts distributed are
paid by the TI Employees Health Benefit Trust.
Deferred compensation
plan. The purpose of this plan is
described on page 77. The amounts payable under this program depend solely on
the performance of investments that the participant has chosen for his plan
balance. The timing of payments is discussed on page 88. Amounts distributed are
paid by the company.
Equity compensation. Depending on the circumstances of
termination, grantees whose employment terminates may retain the right to
exercise previously granted stock options and receive shares under outstanding
RSU awards. Please see pages 84-85. RSU awards include a right to receive
dividend equivalents. The dividend equivalents are paid annually by the company
in a single cash payment after the last dividend payment of the year.
Profit sharing. The purpose of this program, the formula for determining
payments and the timing of payments are described on page 69. Like other U.S.
employees, if a named executive officer remains employed through the end of the
year, he will receive any profit sharing paid for that year. In the event of
retirement or commencement of a bridge to retirement, any profit sharing will be
paid for the portion of the year worked before retirement or the beginning of
the bridge. In the event of termination due to disability or death, the officer
or his beneficiaries would receive any profit sharing paid for the year. Profit
sharing payments are made by the company.
Time bank. Based on years of employment with the company, employees
accrue hours in a time bank. Time bank hours may be used for paid absences from
the office such as vacation and sick days. Employees receive a cash payment for
any time bank hours still outstanding on termination of employment. The amount
paid is calculated by applying the employees base salary rate in effect at the
time of termination to the number of hours remaining in the time bank. Time bank
payments are made in a lump sum by the company. They are ordinarily paid no
later than what would have been the employees next regular pay
cycle.
Perquisites. Financial counseling is available to executive officers
in the year after retirement. Otherwise, no perquisites continue after
termination of employment.
The following tables indicate the
amounts for which each named executive officer would have been eligible if his
employment had terminated on December 31, 2011, as a result of disability,
death, involuntary termination for cause, resignation, retirement or involuntary
termination not for cause (excluding change in control).
Termination due to
disability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Profit |
|
Time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Plan II |
|
Deferred |
|
RSUs |
|
Options |
|
Sharing |
|
Bank |
|
|
|
| Name |
|
Bonus |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
Compensation |
|
(5) |
|
(6) |
|
(7) |
|
(8) |
|
Total |
| Templeton |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
884,132 |
|
$ |
609,677 |
|
$ |
160,125 |
|
|
|
$ |
23,913,487 |
|
$ |
29,621,968 |
|
$ |
78,118 |
|
$ |
175,168 |
|
$ |
55,442,675 |
| March |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
1,439,956 |
|
$ |
349,792 |
|
$ |
3,734,566 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,761,422 |
|
$ |
4,339,525 |
|
$ |
44,349 |
|
$ |
111,916 |
|
$ |
15,781,526 |
| Lowe |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
1,834,009 |
|
$ |
654,107 |
|
$ |
3,370,517 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,951,383 |
|
$ |
5,490,250 |
|
$ |
47,176 |
|
$ |
95,307 |
|
$ |
20,442,749 |
| Ritchie |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
1,879,930 |
|
$ |
926,549 |
|
$ |
4,594,758 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,277,558 |
|
$ |
5,511,250 |
|
$ |
42,873 |
|
$ |
108,945 |
|
$ |
20,341,863 |
| Crutcher |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
10,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,495,854 |
|
$ |
1,640,700 |
|
$ |
37,873 |
|
$ |
32,669 |
|
$ |
9,217,141 |
| (1) |
|
Because the amount of a
bonus is subject to the Compensation Committees discretion considering
the facts and circumstances of the termination, it is not possible to
predict the amount, if any, the executive officer would have
received. |
| |
| (2) |
|
The amount shown is the lump
sum benefit payable at age 65 to the named executive officer in the event
of termination as of December 31, 2011, due to disability, assuming the
named executive officer does not request payment of his disability benefit
until age 65. The assumptions used in calculating these amounts are the
same as the age-65 lump-sum assumptions used for financial reporting
purposes for the companys audited financial statements for 2011 and are
described in note 5 to the 2011 pension benefits table on page 86. |
| |
| (3) |
|
The amount shown is the lump
sum benefit payable at age 65 to the named executive officers in the event
of termination due to disability. The assumptions used are the same as
those described in note 2 above. |
| |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
2012 PROXY
STATEMENT n 89 |
| (4) |
|
The amount shown is the lump
sum benefit payable in the event of separation from service (as defined in
the plan) due to disability. The assumptions used are the same as those
described in note 2 above. |
| |
| (5) |
|
Calculated by multiplying
the number of outstanding RSUs by the closing price of TI common stock as
of December 31, 2011 ($29.11). Because the executive officer will retain
his RSU awards in the event of termination due to disability and they will
continue to vest according to their terms, all outstanding RSUs are
assumed to be vested for purposes of this table. Please see the
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2011 table on pages 82-83 for
the number of unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2011, and page 85 for a
discussion of an additional outstanding RSU award held by Mr.
Templeton. |
| |
| (6) |
|
Calculated as the difference
between the grant price of all outstanding in-the-money options and the
closing price of TI common stock as of December 31, 2011 ($29.11),
multiplied by the number of shares under such options as of December 31,
2011. |
| |
| (7) |
|
Amounts earned in
2011. |
| |
| (8) |
|
Calculated by multiplying
the number of hours remaining in the named executive officers time bank
by the applicable base salary rate as of December 31,
2011. |
Termination due to
death
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
Survivor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
Benefit |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Profit |
|
Time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Plan II |
|
Plan |
|
Compensation |
|
RSUs |
|
Options |
|
Sharing |
|
Bank |
|
|
|
| Name |
|
Bonus |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
(5) |
|
(6) |
|
(7) |
|
(8) |
|
Total |
| Templeton |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
247,835 |
|
$ |
167,749 |
|
$ |
15,383 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,425,512 |
|
$ |
23,913,487 |
|
$ |
29,621,968 |
|
$ |
78,118 |
|
$ |
175,168 |
|
$ |
55,645,220 |
| March |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
298,285 |
|
$ |
104,903 |
|
$ |
1,240,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,761,422 |
|
$ |
4,339,525 |
|
$ |
44,349 |
|
$ |
111,916 |
|
$ |
11,900,408 |
| Lowe |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
300,470 |
|
$ |
159,201 |
|
$ |
1,371,581 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
841,741 |
|
$ |
8,951,383 |
|
$ |
5,490,250 |
|
$ |
47,176 |
|
$ |
95,307 |
|
$ |
17,257,109 |
| Ritchie |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
666,713 |
|
$ |
276,859 |
|
$ |
2,217,366 |
|
$ |
3,131,552 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,277,558 |
|
$ |
5,511,250 |
|
$ |
42,873 |
|
$ |
108,945 |
|
$ |
19,233,116 |
| Crutcher |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
1,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
234,306 |
|
$ |
7,495,854 |
|
$ |
1,640,700 |
|
$ |
37,873 |
|
$ |
32,669 |
|
$ |
9,442,918 |
| (1) |
|
See note 1 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Value of the benefit payable
in a lump sum to the executive officers beneficiary calculated as
required by the terms of the plan assuming the earliest possible payment
date. The plan provides that in the event of death, the beneficiary
receives 50 percent of the participants accrued benefit, reduced by the
age-applicable joint and 50 percent survivor factor. |
| |
| (3) |
|
Value of the benefit payable
in a lump sum to the executive officers beneficiary calculated as
required by the terms of the plan assuming the earliest possible payment
date. |
| |
| (4) |
|
Balance as of December 31,
2011, under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. |
| |
| (5) |
|
Calculated by multiplying
the number of outstanding RSUs by the closing price of TI common stock as
of December 31, 2011 ($29.11). All outstanding RSUs are assumed to be
vested for purposes of this table. Please see the Outstanding Equity
Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2011 table on pages 82-83 for the number of
unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2011, and see page 85 for a discussion of
an additional outstanding RSU award held by Mr. Templeton. |
| |
| (6) |
|
See note 6 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
| |
| (7) |
|
Amounts earned in
2011. |
| |
| (8) |
|
See note 8 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
| |
| 90 n 2012 PROXY
STATEMENT |
TEXAS
INSTRUMENTS |
Involuntary termination for
cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit |
|
Time |
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus |
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Plan II |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Sharing |
|
Bank |
|
|
|
| Name |
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
Compensation |
|
RSUs |
|
Options |
|
(5) |
|
(6) |
|
Total |
| Templeton |
|
|
|
$ |
479,582 |
|
$ |
324,484 |
|
$ |
29,893 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,493,200 |
(4) |
|
|
|
$ |
78,118 |
|
$ |
175,168 |
|
$ |
4,580,445 |
| March |
|
|
|
$ |
552,366 |
|
$ |
194,321 |
|
$ |
2,296,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,349 |
|
$ |
111,916 |
|
$ |
3,199,145 |
| Lowe |
|
|
|
$ |
561,717 |
|
$ |
296,977 |
|
$ |
2,564,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,176 |
|
$ |
95,307 |
|
$ |
3,565,937 |
| Ritchie |
|
|
|
$ |
1,327,229 |
|
$ |
550,900 |
|
$ |
4,414,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,873 |
|
$ |
108,945 |
|
$ |
6,444,308 |
| Crutcher |
|
|
|
$ |
3,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,873 |
|
$ |
32,669 |
|
$ |
73,553 |
| (1) |
|
It is presumed that in the
event of termination for cause no bonus would be awarded. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Lump sum value of the
December 31, 2011, accrued benefit calculated as required by the terms of
the plan assuming the earliest possible payment date. |
| |
| (3) |
|
Lump sum benefit payable at
separation of service (as defined by the plan) assuming the earliest
possible payment date. |
| |
| (4) |
|
Calculated by multiplying
120,000 vested RSUs by the closing price of the companys common stock as
of December 31, 2011 ($29.11). |
| |
| (5) |
|
Amounts earned in
2011. |
| |
| (6) |
|
See note 8 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
Resignation; involuntary
termination (not for cause) excluding change in control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit |
|
Time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Plan II |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Sharing |
|
Bank |
|
|
|
| Name |
|
Bonus |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
Compensation |
|
RSUs |
|
Options |
|
(8) |
|
(9) |
|
Total |
| Templeton |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
479,582 |
|
$ |
324,484 |
|
$ |
29,893 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,493,200 |
(4) |
|
$ |
22,463,277 |
(6) |
|
$ |
78,118 |
|
$ |
175,168 |
|
$ |
27,043,722 |
| March |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
552,366 |
|
$ |
194,321 |
|
$ |
2,296,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,261,441 |
(6) |
|
$ |
44,349 |
|
$ |
111,916 |
|
$ |
5,460,586 |
| Lowe |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
561,717 |
|
$ |
296,977 |
|
$ |
2,564,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,246,613 |
(6) |
|
$ |
47,176 |
|
$ |
95,307 |
|
$ |
5,812,550 |
| Ritchie |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
1,327,229 |
|
$ |
550,900 |
|
$ |
4,414,361 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,759,453 |
(5) |
|
$ |
5,511,250 |
(7) |
|
$ |
42,873 |
|
$ |
108,945 |
|
$ |
14,715,011 |
| Crutcher |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
3,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250,950 |
(6) |
|
$ |
37,873 |
|
$ |
32,669 |
|
$ |
324,503 |
| (1) |
|
See note 1 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
| |
| (2) |
|
See note 2 to the
Involuntary Termination for Cause table. |
| |
| (3) |
|
See note 3 to the
Involuntary Termination for Cause table. |
| |
| (4) |
|
See note 4 to the
Involuntary Termination for Cause table. |
| |
| (5) |
|
Because Mr. Ritchie became
eligible for early retirement in August 2011, calculated by multiplying
the number of outstanding RSUs held by Mr. Ritchie at such termination by
the closing price of TI common stock as of December 31, 2011. His RSU
grants stay in effect and pay out shares according to the vesting
schedule, although the number of shares is reduced according to the
duration of employment over the vesting period. See page 84 for additional
details. |
| |
| (6) |
|
Calculated as the difference
between the grant price of all exercisable in-the-money options and the
closing price of TI common stock as of December 31, 2011 ($29.11),
multiplied by the number of shares under such options as of December 31,
2011. |
| |
| (7) |
|
See note 6 to Termination
Due to Disability table. |
| |
| (8) |
|
Amounts earned in
2011. |
| |
| (9) |
|
See note 8 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
| |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS |
2012 PROXY
STATEMENT n 91 |
In the case of a resignation pursuant
to a separation arrangement, an executive officer (like other employees above a
certain job grade level) will typically be offered a 12-month paid leave of
absence before termination, in exchange for a non-compete and non-solicitation
commitment and a release of claims against the company. The leave period will be
credited to years of service under the pension plans described above. During the
leave, the executive officers stock options will continue to become exercisable
and his RSUs will continue to vest. Amounts paid to an individual during a paid
leave of absence are not counted when calculating profit sharing and benefits
under the qualified and non-qualified pension plans. During a paid leave of
absence an individual does not continue to accrue time bank hours. He retains
medical and insurance benefits at essentially the same rates as active company
employees during the paid leave of absence
period.
In the
case of a separation arrangement in which the paid leave of absence expires when
the executive officer will be at least 50 years old and have at least 15 years
of employment with the company, the separation arrangement will typically
include an unpaid leave of absence, to commence at the end of the paid leave and
end when the executive officer has reached the earlier of age 55 with at least
20 years of employment or age 60 (bridge to retirement). The bridge to
retirement will be credited to years of service under the qualified and
non-qualified defined benefit plans described above. The executive officer will
not receive profit sharing or accrue time bank hours for the period he is on a
bridge to retirement, but he will retain medical and insurance benefits at
essentially the same rates as active company employees. Stock options will
continue to become exercisable and RSUs will remain in effect, but the number of
RSUs will be reduced as described in note * on page 84.
Involuntary termination (not for cause) after a change in
control of TI is discussed under the heading Change in control below.
Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
Qualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Profit |
|
Time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Plan II |
|
Deferred |
|
RSUs |
|
Options |
|
Sharing |
|
Bank |
|
|
|
| Name |
|
Bonus |
|
(3) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
Compensation |
|
(5) |
|
(6) |
|
(7) |
|
(8) |
|
Total |
| Ritchie (1) |
|
(2) |
|
$ |
1,327,229 |
|
$ |
550,900 |
|
$ |
4,414,361 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,759,453 |
|
$ |
5,511,250 |
|
$ |
42,873 |
|
$ |
108,945 |
|
$ |
14,715,011 |
| (1) |
|
Mr. Ritchie was the only
named executive officer eligible to retire as of December 31, 2011.
Accordingly, no potential payments for the other named executive officers
are stated assuming retirement as of that date. |
| |
| (2) |
|
See note 1 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
| |
| (3) |
|
See note 2 to the
Involuntary Termination for Cause table. |
| |
| (4) |
|
See note 3 to the
Involuntary Termination for Cause table. |
| |
| (5) |
|
See note 5 to the
Resignation; Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) Excluding Change in
Control table. |
| |
| (6) |
|
See note 6 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
| |
| (7) |
|
Amounts earned in
2011. |
| |
| (8) |
|
See note 8 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
Change in
control
We have no program, plan or
arrangement providing benefits triggered by a change in control except as
described below. In fact, the only consequences of a change in control are the
acceleration of payment of existing balances and the full vesting of certain
outstanding equity awards.
A change in control at December 31, 2011, would have
triggered payment of the balance under the TI Employees Non-Qualified Pension
Plan. Please see pages 87-88 for a discussion of the purpose of change in control
provisions relating to the non-qualified defined benefit plans and the deferred
compensation plan as well as the circumstances and the timing of
payment.
Please see pages 84-85 for further
information concerning change in control provisions relating to stock options
and RSU awards.
For a discussion of the impact of these programs on the compensation
decisions for 2011, please see page 78.
| 92 n 2012 PROXY
STATEMENT |
TEXAS
INSTRUMENTS |
The following table indicates the
amounts that would have been triggered for each executive officer had there been
a change in control as of December 31, 2011. The actual amounts that would be
paid out can only be determined at the time the change in control
occurs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified |
|
Defined |
|
Qualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
Benefit |
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit |
|
Pension |
|
Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Plan |
|
Pension |
|
Deferred |
|
RSUs |
|
Options |
|
Profit |
|
Time |
|
|
|
| Name |
|
Bonus |
|
Plan |
|
(2) |
|
Plan II |
|
Compensation |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
Sharing |
|
Bank |
|
Total |
| Templeton |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
$ |
324,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,307,187 |
|
$ |
4,704,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,336,062 |
| March |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
$ |
194,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,862,503 |
|
$ |
1,345,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,402,024 |
| Lowe |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
$ |
296,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,463,553 |
|
$ |
1,982,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,742,930 |
| Ritchie |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
$ |
550,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,881,353 |
|
$ |
1,770,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,202,253 |
| Crutcher |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,552,553 |
|
$ |
708,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,260,553 |
| (1) |
|
See note 1 to the
Termination Due to Disability table. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Lump sum value of the
December 31, 2011, accrued benefit calculated as required by the terms of
the plan assuming the earliest possible payment date. |
| |
| (3) |
|
Calculated by multiplying
the number of RSUs granted prior to 2010 by the closing price of the
companys common stock as of December 31, 2011 ($29.11). |
| |
| (4) |
|
Upon a change in control
meeting the pre-2010 definition (please see page 84), all outstanding
options granted prior to 2010 become immediately exercisable. Calculated
as the difference between the grant price of in-the-money options not
already exercisable and the closing price of the companys common stock as
of December 31, 2011 ($29.11), multiplied by the number of those options
as of December 31, 2011. |
An involuntary termination (not for
cause) within 24 months after a change in control of TI will accelerate, to the
extent permitted by Section 409A of the IRC, the vesting of options and RSUs
granted after 2009. |