Texas Instruments
 

Proxy statement – March 6, 2012

Executive offices
12500 TI BOULEVARD, DALLAS, TEXAS 75243
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 660199, DALLAS, TEXAS 75266-0199

Voting procedures and quorum
TI’s board of directors requests your proxy for the annual meeting of stockholders on April 19, 2012. If you sign and return the enclosed proxy, or vote by telephone or on the Internet, you authorize the persons named in the proxy to represent you and vote your shares for the purposes mentioned in the notice of annual meeting. This proxy statement and related proxy are being distributed on or about March 6, 2012. If you come to the meeting, you can vote in person. If you don’t come to the meeting, your shares can be voted only if you have returned a properly signed proxy or followed the telephone or Internet voting instructions, which can be found on the enclosed proxy. If you sign and return your proxy but do not give voting instructions, the shares represented by that proxy will be voted as recommended by the board of directors. You can revoke your authorization at any time before the shares are voted at the meeting.
     A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. If at least a majority of the shares of TI stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote are present in person or by proxy, a quorum will exist. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum. Broker non-votes occur when a beneficial owner who holds company stock through a broker does not provide the broker with voting instructions as to any matter on which the broker is not permitted to exercise its discretion and vote without specific instruction.
     Scheduled to be considered at the meeting are the election of directors, an advisory vote regarding approval of the company’s executive compensation, and ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Each of these matters is discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement.
     Any other matter that may properly be submitted at the meeting is approved if a majority of the votes present at the meeting vote “for” the proposal. On such matters you may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain”; abstentions and broker non-votes have the same effect as votes “against.”

56 n 2012 PROXY STATEMENT TEXAS INSTRUMENTS

Election of directors
Directors are elected at the annual meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified. The board of directors has designated the following persons as nominees: RALPH W. BABB, JR., DANIEL A. CARP, CARRIE S. COX, PAMELA H. PATSLEY, ROBERT E. SANCHEZ, WAYNE R. SANDERS, RUTH J. SIMMONS, RICHARD K. TEMPLETON and CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN. Stephen P. MacMillan, a highly valued director since 2008, resigned from the board in February 2012.
     If you return a proxy that is not otherwise marked, your shares will be voted FOR each of the nominees.
    
Directors must be elected by a majority of the votes present at the meeting and entitled to be cast in the election. You may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain.” Abstentions have the same effect as votes “against.” Broker non-votes are not counted as votes “for” or “against.”

Nominees for directorship

All of the nominees for directorship are directors of the company. For a discussion of each nominee’s qualifications to serve as a director of the company, please see pages 58-59. If any nominee becomes unable to serve before the meeting, the people named as proxies may vote for a substitute or the number of directors will be reduced accordingly.

Directors

RALPH W. BABB, JR.
Age 63
Director since 2010
Member, Audit Committee
   
DANIEL A. CARP
Age 63
Director since 1997
Member, Governance and Stockholder
Relations Committee
 
CARRIE S. COX
Age 54
Director since 2004
Chair, Compensation Committee
   
PAMELA H. PATSLEY
Age 55
Director since 2004
Lead Director; Chair, Audit Committee
   
ROBERT E. SANCHEZ
Age 46
Director since 2011
Member, Audit Committee
WAYNE R. SANDERS
Age 64
Director since 1997
Member, Governance and Stockholder
Relations Committee
 
RUTH J. SIMMONS
Age 66
Director since 1999
Member, Compensation Committee
 
RICHARD K. TEMPLETON
Age 53
Chairman since 2008 and
director since 2003
 
CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN
Age 65
Director since 2003
Chair, Governance and Stockholder
Relations Committee

 

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS 2012 PROXY STATEMENT n 57

Director nomination process

The board is responsible for approving nominees for election as directors. To assist in this task, the board has designated a standing committee, the Governance and Stockholder Relations Committee (the G&SR Committee), which is responsible for reviewing and recommending nominees to the board. The G&SR Committee is comprised solely of independent directors as defined by the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) and the board’s corporate governance guidelines. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the G&SR Committee. It can be found on our website at www.ti.com/corporategovernance.
     It is a long-standing policy of the board to consider prospective board nominees recommended by stockholders. A stockholder who wishes to recommend a prospective board nominee for the G&SR Committee’s consideration can write to the Secretary of the G&SR Committee, Texas Instruments Incorporated, P.O. Box 655936, MS 8658, Dallas, Texas 75265-5936. The G&SR Committee will evaluate the stockholder’s prospective board nominee in the same manner as it evaluates other nominees.
    
In evaluating prospective nominees, the G&SR Committee looks for the following minimum qualifications, qualities and skills:
  • Outstanding achievement in the individual’s personal career.
  • Breadth of experience.
  • Soundness of judgment.
  • Ability to make independent, analytical inquiries.
  • Ability to contribute to a diversity of viewpoints among board members.
  • Willingness and ability to devote the time required to perform board activities adequately (in this regard, the G&SR Committee will consider the number of other boards on which the individual serves as a director, and in particular the board’s policy that directors should not serve on the boards of more than three other public companies).
  • Ability to represent the total corporate interests of TI (a director will not be selected to, nor will he or she be expected to, represent the interests of any particular group).
     Stockholders, non-employee directors, management and others may submit recommendations to the G&SR Committee.
     The board believes its current size is within the desired range as stated in the board’s corporate governance guidelines.

Board diversity and nominee qualifications

As indicated by the criteria above, the board prefers a mix of background and experience among its members. The board does not follow any ratio or formula to determine the appropriate mix. Rather, it uses its judgment to identify nominees whose backgrounds, attributes and experiences, taken as a whole, will contribute to the high standards of board service at the company. The effectiveness of this approach is evidenced by the directors’ participation in the insightful and robust yet collegial deliberation that occurs at board and committee meetings and in shaping the agendas for those meetings.
     As it considered director nominees for the 2012 annual meeting, the board kept in mind that the most important issues it considers typically relate to the company’s strategic direction; succession planning for senior executive positions; the company’s financial performance; the challenges of running a large, complex enterprise, including the management of its risks; major acquisitions and divestitures; and significant capital investment and research and development (R&D) decisions. These issues arise in the context of the company’s operations, which primarily involve the manufacture and sale of semiconductors all over the world into communications, computing, industrial and consumer electronics end markets.
     As described below, each of our director nominees has achieved an extremely high level of success in his or her career, whether at multi-billion dollar multinational corporate enterprises, major U.S. universities or large governmental organizations. In these positions, each has been directly involved in the challenges relating to setting the strategic direction and managing the financial performance, personnel and processes of large, complex organizations. Each has had exposure to effective leaders and has developed the ability to judge leadership qualities. Seven of them have experience in serving on the board of directors of at least one other major corporation, and one has served in high political office, all of which provides additional relevant experience on which each nominee can draw.
     In concluding that each nominee should serve as a director, the board relied on the specific experiences and attributes listed below and on the direct personal knowledge, born of previous service on the board, that each of the nominees brings insight and collegiality to board deliberations.

Mr. Babb
  • As chairman and CEO of Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Bank (2002-present) and through a long career in banking, has gained first-hand experience in managing large, complex institutions, as well as insight into financial markets, which experience is particularly relevant to the company due to its global presence.
  • As chief financial officer of Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Bank (1995-2002), controller and later chief financial officer of Mercantile Bancorporation (1978-1995), and auditor and later audit manager at the accounting firm of Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co. (1971-1978), gained extensive audit knowledge and experience in audit- and financial control-related matters.

58 n 2012 PROXY STATEMENT TEXAS INSTRUMENTS

Mr. Carp
  • As chairman and CEO (2000-2005) and president (1997-2001, 2002-2003) of Eastman Kodak Company, gained first-hand experience in managing a large, multinational corporation focused on worldwide electronic consumer markets (which are of relevance to the company), with ultimate management responsibility for the corporation’s financial performance and its significant investments in capital and R&D.
  • As chairman of the board of directors of Delta Air Lines (2007-present), a director of Norfolk Southern Corporation (2006-present) and a former director of Liz Claiborne, Inc. (2006-2009), has helped oversee the strategy and operations of major multinational corporations in various industries, including some that are capital-intensive.
Ms. Cox
  • As CEO and a director of Humacyte, Inc. (2010-present), executive vice president and president of Global Pharmaceuticals at Schering-Plough Corporation (2003-2009) and executive vice president and president of Global Prescription Business at Pharmacia Corporation (1997-2003), has gained first-hand experience in managing large, multinational organizations focused on medical-related markets (which are of relevance to the company), with responsibility for those organizations’ financial performance and significant capital and R&D investments. Is also a director of Cardinal Health, Inc. (2009-present) and Celgene Corporation (2009-present).
Ms. Patsley
  • As chairman and CEO (2009-present) of MoneyGram International, Inc., senior executive vice president of First Data Corporation (2000-2007), and president and CEO of Paymentech, Inc. (1991-2000), has gained first-hand experience managing large, multinational organizations, including the application of technology in the financial services sector, with ultimate management responsibility for their financial performance and significant capital investments.
  • As Audit Committee chair at the company, a member of the audit committee at Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., chief financial officer of First USA, Inc. (1987-1994), and a former auditor at KPMG Peat Marwick for almost six years before joining First USA, has developed a keen appreciation for audit- and financial control-related issues.
  • As a director of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (2008-present) and a former director of Molson Coors Brewing Company (2005-2009), has helped oversee the strategy and operations of other major multinational corporations.
Mr. Sanchez
  • As president and chief operating officer (February 2012-present) and president, Global Fleet Management Solutions, of Ryder System, Inc. (September 2010-February 2012), has gained first-hand experience in managing a large, multinational, transportation-related organization, with responsibility for the organization’s financial performance and significant capital investments.
  • As executive vice president and chief financial officer (October 2007 to September 2010) and as senior vice president and chief information officer (2003-2005) of Ryder System, Inc., developed a keen appreciation for audit- and financial control-related issues and gained first-hand experience with all technology-related functions of a large multinational corporation focused on transportation and logistics.
Mr. Sanders
  • As chairman (1992-2003) and CEO (1991-2002) of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, gained first-hand experience in managing a large, multinational consumer goods corporation, with ultimate management responsibility for its financial performance and its significant capital and R&D investments.
  • As chairman of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (2008-present) and director of Belo Corporation (2003-present), has helped oversee the strategy and operations of other large corporations.
Ms. Simmons
  • As president of Brown University (2001-present) and president of Smith College (1995-2001), has gained first-hand experience in managing large, complex institutions, and has developed deep insight into the development and training of professionals, including engineers, scientists and technologists, on whom the company relies for its next generation of employees.
  • As a former director of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (2000-2010) and Pfizer, Inc. (1997-2007), helped oversee the strategy and operations of other large corporations.
Mr. Templeton
  • As a 31-year veteran of the semiconductor industry, serving the last 16 years at a senior level at the company, including as chairman since April 2008, CEO since 2004 and director since 2003, has developed a deep knowledge of all aspects of the company and of the semiconductor industry.
Ms. Whitman
  • As Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (2001-2003) and Governor of the state of New Jersey (1994-2000), gained first-hand experience managing a large, complex organization and developed keen insight into the workings of government on the federal and state level and how they might impact company operations.
  • As a director of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (2003-present) and United Technologies Corp. (2003-present), has helped oversee the strategy and operations of other large corporations.

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS 2012 PROXY STATEMENT n 59

Communications with the board

Stockholders and others who wish to communicate with the board as a whole, or to individual directors, may write to them at: P.O. Box 655936, MS 8658, Dallas, Texas 75265-5936. All communications sent to this address will be shared with the board or the individual director, if so addressed.

Corporate governance

The board has a long-standing commitment to responsible and effective corporate governance. The board’s corporate governance guidelines (which include the director independence standards), the charters of each of the board’s committees, TI’s code of business conduct and our code of ethics for our chief executive officer and senior financial officers are available on our website at www.ti.com/corporategovernance. Stockholders may request copies of these documents free of charge by writing to Texas Instruments Incorporated, P.O. Box 660199, MS 8657, Dallas, Texas, 75266-0199, Attn: Investor Relations.

Annual meeting attendance

It is a policy of the board to encourage directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. Such attendance allows for direct interaction between stockholders and board members. In 2011, all directors attended TI’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Director independence

The board has determined that each of our directors is independent except for Mr. Templeton. In connection with this determination, information was reviewed regarding directors’ business and charitable affiliations, immediate family members and their employers, and any transactions or arrangements between the company and such persons or entities. The board has adopted the following standards for determining independence.

A.  In no event will a director be considered independent if:
1.  He or she is a current partner of or is employed by the company’s independent auditors; or
2. An immediate family member of the director is (a) a current partner of the company’s independent auditors or (b) currently employed by the company’s independent auditors and personally works on the company’s audit.
3. Within the current or preceding three fiscal years he or she was, and remains at the time of the determination, an executive officer or employee of an organization that (a) made payments to, or received payments from, TI for property or services, (b) extended loans to or received loans from, TI, or (c) received charitable contributions from TI, in an amount or amounts which, in the aggregate in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $200,000 or 2 percent of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for its last completed fiscal year (for purposes of this standard, “payments” excludes payments arising solely from investments in the company’s securities and payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs); or
4. Within the current or preceding three fiscal years an immediate family member of the director was, and remains at the time of the determination, an executive officer of an organization that (a) made payments to, or received payments from, TI for property or services, (b) extended loans to or received loans from TI, or (c) received charitable contributions from TI, in an amount or amounts which, in the aggregate in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $200,000 or 2 percent of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for its last completed fiscal year (for purposes of this standard, “payments” excludes payments arising solely from investments in the company’s securities and payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs).
B. In no event will a director be considered independent if, within the preceding three years:
1. He or she was employed by the company (except in the capacity of interim chairman of the board, chief executive officer or other executive officer, provided the interim employment did not last longer than one year) or any of its subsidiaries;
2. He or she received more than $120,000 during any twelve-month period in direct compensation from TI (other than (a) compensation for board or board committee service, (b) compensation received for former service as an interim chairman of the board, chief executive officer or other executive officer and (c) benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation);
3. An immediate family member of the director was employed as an executive officer by the company or any of its subsidiaries;
4. An immediate family member of the director received more than $120,000 during any twelve-month period in direct compensation from TI (excluding compensation as a non-executive officer employee of the company);
5. He or she was (but is no longer) a partner or employee of the company’s independent auditors and personally worked on the company’s audit within that time;
6. An immediate family member of the director was (but is no longer) a partner or employee of the company’s independent auditors and personally worked on the company’s audit within that time;
 
60 n 2012 PROXY STATEMENT TEXAS INSTRUMENTS

7.  He or she was an executive officer of another company at which any of TI’s current executive officers at the same time served on that company’s compensation committee; or
8. An immediate family member of the director was an executive officer of another company at which any of TI’s current executive officers at the same time served on that company’s compensation committee.
C.  Audit Committee members may not accept any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from TI, other than in their capacity as members of the board or any board committee. Compensatory fees do not include the receipt of fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan (including deferred compensation) for prior service with TI (provided that such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service).
     For any other relationship, the determination of whether it would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities, and consequently whether the director involved is independent, will be made by directors who satisfy the independence criteria set forth in this section.
    
For purposes of these independence determinations, “immediate family member” will have the same meaning as under NASDAQ rules.
 
 
Texas Instruments   © Copyright 1995-2012 Texas Instruments Incorporated. All rights reserved.