SLYT859 September 2024 ADC32RF52 , ADC32RF54 , ADC32RF55 , ADC34RF52 , ADC34RF55 , DAC39RF10 , DAC39RF10EF , DAC39RF12 , DAC39RFS10 , DAC39RFS10EF , DAC39RFS12 , DDS39RF10 , DDS39RF12 , DDS39RFS10 , DDS39RFS12
As data converters continue evolving, it’s a challenge to meet multiband requirements in systems such as software-defined radios, wireless testers and spectrum analyzers. System designers are reevaluating traditional frequency-hopping methods as devices become more complex and capable of faster transitions between numerically controlled oscillator (NCO) frequencies.
In this article, I’ll explore the evolution of frequency-hopping techniques, comparing traditional and advanced methods such as general-purpose input/output (GPIO) and fast reconfiguration interface (FRI). Understanding these advancements can help you gain valuable insights into optimizing frequency hopping for both single- and multiband applications. But to fully grasp how modern systems meet multiband requirements, it’s essential to first understand the fundamentals of frequency hopping.