SNVAA93 December 2023 LM65645-Q1 , LM70660 , LM706A0 , LM706A0-Q1 , LM70840 , LM70840-Q1 , LM70860 , LM70860-Q1 , LM70880 , LM70880-Q1 , LMR38020-Q1 , LMR38025-Q1
Layout plays a crucial role in minimizing EMI noise, and when possible, a four-layer PCB is recommended. The top layer should primarily accommodate the converter, inductor, and SW node, all of which are noise sources. The second layer should be a continuous copper pour acting as a ground plane to provide shielding. The third layer can be utilized for routing input, output, and signal traces. Lastly, the bottom layer should house the EMI filter, positioned far away from the noise sources on the top layer.
The recommended layout for the synchronous buck converter LMR38020-Q1 is outlined below, with important points to consider:
Figure 3-5 Top-layer LayoutFigure 3-6 illustrates the placement of Cin in both asymmetric and symmetrical configurations. Figure 3-13 and Figure 3-13 display the comparison of EMI test results between the two configurations. The data indicates that in the FM band, the peak and average noise levels of the symmetrical capacitor placement are approximately 4dB lower compared to the asymmetric configuration. This finding validates the benefits of magnetic field cancellation achieved through the symmetrical placement of capacitors.
Figure 3-6 Cin With and Without Symmetrical Placement of Buck Converter
Figure 3-7 Conducted EMI Test Result of Non-symmetrical Cin Placement
Figure 3-8 Conducted EMI Test Result of Symmetrical Cin PlacementFigure 3-25 demonstrates the second layer layout considerations. In this layout the entire second layer is filled with copper as the ground plane. This ground plane is positioned directly underneath the input critical loop and the inductor. By doing so, eddy currents are induced in the copper which help weaken the magnetic coupling between components and reduces the overall EMI noise.
Figure 3-9 Second-layer Layout
Figure 3-10 Third-layer Layout
Figure 3-11 Bottom-layer Layout