SBOA434 December   2020 LME49724 , OPA1632 , OPA1637 , OPA202 , OPA2202 , OPA4202 , THP210 , TLV320ADC5140

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1Introduction
  3. 2Super-Beta BJT
  4. 3Benefits of OPA1637
  5. 4Typical Applications of OPA1637
  6. 5Summary
  7. 6References

Benefits of OPA1637

With reduced input bias current and input bias current noise, the OPA1637 with TI’s super-beta BJT input enables a circuit designer to use higher input resistor values than the prior generation of audio FDAs. This translates to power savings in the end application. An example circuit is shown in Figure 3-1.

GUID-20200827-CA0I-GQRX-XXSX-WCWDT1NWNKFC-low.gif Figure 3-1 Typical application circuit for an OPA1637

It might appear that the OPA1637 has higher noise than the prior audio FDAs, such as OPA1632. Table 3-1 provides a detailed comparison of the two devices.

Table 3-1 Audio FDA Comparison of OPA1637 and OPA1632
Parameter OPA1637 OPA1632
Number of channels 1 1
Total supply voltage (Min) (+5 V = 5, +/-5 V = 10 ) 3 5
Total supply voltage (Max) (+5 V = 5, +/-5 V= 10) 36 30
GBW (Typ) (MHz) 9.2 180
Slew rate (Typ) (V/us) 15 50
Rail-to-rail RRO NO
Vos (offset voltage @ 25 C) (Max ) (mV) 0.2 3
Iq per channel (Typ) (mA) 0.95 14
Iq per GBW (Typ) (uA/MHz) 103 78
Vn at 1 kHz (Typ) (nV/rtHz) 3.7 1.5
Vn corner frequency (Typ) (Hz) 5 500
THD + N @ 1 kHz (Typ) (dB) 120 133
CMRR (Typ) (dB) 140 90
Input bias current (Max) (nA) 2 200
In at 1 kHz (Typ) (pA/rtHz) 0.3 0.6
In corner frequency (Typ) (Hz) 10 1000
Output current (Typ) (mA) 31 85
Operating temperature range (C) -40 to 125 -40 to 85

In the actual application circuit shown in Figure 3-1, it is evident that those parameters do not dominate the total noise. Figure 3-2 shows that in the case of higher input resistor values such as 10 kΩ, an OPA1637 has lower noise than an OPA1632 in the entire audible frequency range due to its lower current noise. Even with lower input resistor values, such as 1 kΩ, the difference in total noise is insignificant (less than 0.5 uV).

GUID-20200827-CA0I-RKS3-MB7M-3ZFVPXBQ6P5L-low.png Figure 3-2 Total noise comparison with respect to the input resistor value for FDAs

The OPA1637 and OPA1632 have similar input topology, a differential pair BJT (Equation 3). The broadband input referred voltage and the current noise are dominated by the collector current and the current gain (β) .

Equation 5. GUID-20200812-CA0I-8DD4-7BBC-X5TN6Z4WDKDN-low.gif
Equation 6. GUID-20200812-CA0I-CPHT-RHC5-J33L5PL2DM6H-low.gif

The OPA1637 achieves superior performance with the super-beta BJT. It reduces the supply current by 10x compared to the OPA1632. The OPA1637 has a much lower 1/f corner frequency than the OPA1632 and other audio FDAs. In conclusion, the OPA1637 is the one of the best suited FDAs for audio applications due to its low noise and power consumption.