SLYY243 February   2025

 

  1.   1
  2.   Overview
  3.   At a glance
  4.   Introduction
  5.   48V in MHEVs vs. BEVs
  6.   Reducing the wire harness
  7.   48V architectures
  8.   48V design challenges
  9.   Conclusion

48V in MHEVs vs. BEVs

In the late 1990s, there was a push for 42V E/E systems. But OEMs abandoned this approach given the lack of high-efficiency motors, and there was a market shift toward MHEVs that used a high-voltage starter generator. Thus, while MHEVs were the “first” 48V systems, they used only a 48V battery and small electric motor to assist the ICE, which reduces fuel consumption and improves efficiency.

The main low-voltage rail powering E/E systems within MHEVs remains at 12V and requires a large bidirectional converter between the 48V and 12V rail, adding a large cost burden. In contrast, full hybrids (HEVs), plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) and BEVs can use the high-voltage battery to create a 48V low-voltage rail to power the entire E/E system.

Because of limited trim lines and platforms, future BEV platforms were the primary target for OEMs to implement 48V automotive systems. The transition to electric-drive vehicles has also increased investments in HEVs and PHEVs. Figure 1 provides an overview of the differences between vehicle types.

 Overview of vehicle powertrain
                    types. Figure 1 Overview of vehicle powertrain types.