SLVK099B March   2022  – September 2023 TPS7H5001-SP , TPS7H5002-SP , TPS7H5003-SP , TPS7H5004-SP

PRODUCTION DATA  

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. Introduction
  5. Single-Event Effects (SEE)
  6. Device and Test Board Information
  7. Irradiation Facility and Setup
  8. Depth, Range, and LETEFF Calculation
  9. Test Setup and Procedures
  10. Destructive Single-Event Effects (DSEE)
    1. 7.1 Single-Event Latch-Up (SEL) Results
    2. 7.2 Single-Event Burnout (SEB) and Single-Event Gate Rupture (SEGR) Results
  11. Single-Event Transients (SET)
    1. 8.1 System Level Implications
  12. Event Rate Calculations
  13. 10Summary
  14.   A Total Ionizing Dose from SEE Experiments
  15.   B References
  16.   C Revision History

Single-Event Burnout (SEB) and Single-Event Gate Rupture (SEGR) Results

During the SEB and SEGR characterization, the device was tested at room temperature or approximately 25°C. The device was tested under the enabled and disabled mode. For the SEB-OFF mode the device was disabled using the EN pin by forcing 100 mV (using CH 0 of a E36311A Keysight PS). During the SEB and SEGR testing with the device in disabled mode, not a single OUTA (only trigger signal used) transient or input current event was observed.

The ion species used for the SEB and SEGR testing was Holmium (165Ho) at incident angle for an LETEFF = 75 MeV·cm2/mg. Flux of approximately 105 ions/cm2·s and a fluence of approximately 107 ions/cm2 was used for the run. Run duration to achieve this fluence was approximately 2 minutes. The six devices (three for TPS7H5001-SP and one each for TPS7H5002/3/4-SP) were powered up using the recommended maximum voltage of 14 V. No SEB and SEGR current events were observed during the seven runs, indicating that the TPS7H500X-SP is SEB and SEGR-free up to LETEFF = 75 MeV·cm2/mg and across the full electrical specifications. Table 8-4 shows the SEB and SEGR test conditions and results. Figure 7-2 shows the current versus time for run #4 (Disabled) and Figure 7-3 shows the current versus time for run #6 (enabled).

Table 7-2 Summary of TPS7H5001-SP SEB/SEGR Test Condition and Results
Run #DeviceUnit #IonLETEFF (MeV·cm2/mg)Flux (ions·cm2/mg)Fluence (# ions)Enabled Status
4TPS7H50011Ho751.24 × 1051.01 × 107Disabled
5TPS7H50011Ho751.26 × 1059.96 × 106Disabled
6TPS7H50011Ho751.31 × 1059.98 × 106Enabled
7TPS7H50012Ho759.73 × 1041 × 107Disabled
8TPS7H50012Ho751.01 × 1051 × 107Enabled
9TPS7H50013Ho751.17 × 1059.96 × 106Disabled
10TPS7H50013Ho751.13 × 1051 × 107Enabled
76TPS7H50029Ho751.06 × 1059.96 × 106Disabled
77TPS7H50029Ho758.12 × 1049.98 × 106Enabled
78TPS7H500310Ho751.14 × 1059.96 × 106Disabled
79TPS7H500310Ho751.15 × 1059.95 × 106Enabled
80TPS7H500411Ho751.13 × 1051 × 107Disabled
81TPS7H500411Ho751.14 × 1051 × 107Enabled

Using the MFTF method shown in Single-Event Effects (SEE) Confidence Interval Calculations, the upper-bound cross-section (using a 95% confidence level) is calculated as:

σSEB ≤ 5.27 × 10–8 cm2/device for LETEFF = 75 MeV·cm2/mg and T = 25°C.

GUID-20220119-SS0I-3WQM-KJBD-B2GRBTVTHTZ8-low.png Figure 7-2 Current vs Time for Run #4 (Disabled) for the TPS7H5001-SP at T = 25°C
GUID-20220119-SS0I-HRS9-Z64H-NMKSBFXJCJDC-low.png Figure 7-3 Current vs Time for Run #6 (Enabled) for the TPS7H5001-SP at T = 25°C