SWRZ079D january   2018  – june 2023 CC2642R

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Advisories Matrix
  5. 2Nomenclature, Package Symbolization, and Revision Identification
    1. 2.1 Device and Development Support-Tool Nomenclature
    2. 2.2 Devices Supported
    3. 2.3 Package Symbolization and Revision Identification
  6. 3Advisories
    1.     Radio_03
    2.     Power_03
    3.     PKA_01
    4.     PKA_02
    5.     I2C_01
    6.     I2S_01
    7.     CPU_01
    8.     CPU_02
    9.     CPU_03
    10.     CPU_Sys_01
    11.     Sys_01
    12.     Advisory Sys_05
    13.     SYSCTRL_01
    14.     SRAM_01
    15.     GPTM_01
    16.     ADC_01
    17.     ADC_02
    18.     ADC_03
    19.     ADC_04
    20.     ADC_05
  7. 4Revision History

CPU_02

Arm® Errata #752770: Interrupted loads to SP can cause erroneous behavior

Revisions Affected:

Revision F and earlier

Details:

An interrupt occurring during the data-phase of a single word load to the stack-pointer (SP/R13) can cause an erroneous behavior of the device. In all cases, returning from the interrupt will result in the load instruction being executed an additional time. For all instructions performing an update to the base register, the base register will be erroneously updated on each execution, resulting in the stack-pointer being loaded from an incorrect memory location.

The affected instructions that can result in the load transaction being repeated are:

  • LDR SP,[Rn],#imm
  • LDR SP,[Rn,#imm]!
  • LDR SP,[Rn,#imm]
  • LDR SP,[Rn]
  • LDR SP,[Rn,Rm]

The affected instructions that can result in the stack-pointer being loaded from an incorrect memory address are:

  • LDR SP,[Rn],#imm
  • LDR SP,[Rn,#imm]!

Conditions:

  • An LDR is executed, with SP/R13 as the destination.
  • The address for the LDR is successfully issued to the memory system.
  • An interrupt is taken before the data has been returned and written to the stack-pointer.

Implications:

Unless the load is being performed to device memory or strongly-ordered memory, there should be no implications from the repetition of the load.

  • In the unlikely event that the load is being performed to device memory or strongly-ordered memory, the repeated read can result in the final stack-pointer value being different than had only a single load been performed.
  • Interruption of the two write-back forms of the instruction can result in both the base register value and the final stack-pointer value being incorrect. This can result in apparent stack corruption and subsequent unintended modification of memory.

Workaround:

Most compilers ensure this bug is not triggered by not emitting the affected instruction sequence and not using the instructions in the compiler runtime libraries. This includes:

  • IAR from v6.21
  • All versions of TI's Arm compiler (CCS)

A workaround for both issues can be implemented by replacing the direct load to the stack-pointer, with an intermediate load to a general-purpose register followed by a move to the stack-pointer.

If repeated reads are acceptable, then the base register update issue may be worked around by performing the stack-pointer load without the base increment followed by a subsequent ADD or SUB instruction to perform the appropriate update to the base register.