SLYA079 November   2023 TMAG5170D-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
  5. 2Diametric Magnet Approach
    1. 2.1 Errors and Redundancy for Diametric Magnet Approach
    2. 2.2 Sensor Offset Results
    3. 2.3 Magnet Tilt Results
    4. 2.4 Magnet Offset Results
    5. 2.5 Magnet Diameter Results
  6. 3Axial Magnet Approach
    1. 3.1 Errors and Redundancy for Axial Magnet Approach
    2. 3.2 Offset Results
  7. 4Summary
  8. 5References

Magnet Diameter Results

Variation in magnet fabrication is a source of error. However, the manufacturing variation in dimension for a chosen magnet is usually relatively small, so the impact can be unsubstantial. However, making the intended size of the magnet diameter smaller, creates more pronounced errors for large system assembly tolerances.

GUID-20231031-SS0I-7PTV-477Z-QH4CLRWKNCBZ-low.svgFigure 2-22 Stacked Die Absolute Angle Error Versus Sensor XY Offset for Different Magnet Diameters
GUID-20231101-SS0I-H0MH-HRGZ-4KGWRSCZH64P-low.svgFigure 2-23 Side-by-Side Die Absolute Angle Error Versus Sensor XY Offset for Different Magnet Diameters

In Figure 2-22 and Figure 2-23, the larger diameter magnet exhibits greater immunity to the sensor being offset from the ideal location centered right beneath the axis of rotation for the magnet. The 6-mm diameter magnet exhibits the greatest error, more than 2x what is observed for the 12.7-mm diameter. Worst case error for the side-by-side die is nearly double that of the stacked die.