SLAA649G October   2014  – August 2021 MSP430F2001 , MSP430F2002 , MSP430F2003 , MSP430F2011 , MSP430F2012 , MSP430F2013 , MSP430F2013-EP , MSP430F2101 , MSP430F2111 , MSP430F2112 , MSP430F2121 , MSP430F2122 , MSP430F2131 , MSP430F2132 , MSP430F2232 , MSP430F2234 , MSP430F2252 , MSP430F2254 , MSP430F2272 , MSP430F2274 , MSP430F2274-EP , MSP430F233 , MSP430F2330 , MSP430F235 , MSP430F2350 , MSP430F2370 , MSP430F2410 , MSP430F2416 , MSP430F2417 , MSP430F2418 , MSP430F2419 , MSP430F247 , MSP430F2471 , MSP430F248 , MSP430F2481 , MSP430F249 , MSP430F249-EP , MSP430F2491 , MSP430F2616 , MSP430F2617 , MSP430F2618 , MSP430F2619 , MSP430F2619S-HT , MSP430FR2032 , MSP430FR2033 , MSP430FR2110 , MSP430FR2111 , MSP430FR2153 , MSP430FR2155 , MSP430FR2310 , MSP430FR2311 , MSP430FR2353 , MSP430FR2355 , MSP430FR2433 , MSP430FR2475 , MSP430FR2476 , MSP430FR2532 , MSP430FR2533 , MSP430FR2632 , MSP430FR2633 , MSP430FR2672 , MSP430FR2673 , MSP430FR2675 , MSP430FR2676 , MSP430FR4131 , MSP430FR4132 , MSP430FR4133 , MSP430G2001 , MSP430G2101 , MSP430G2102 , MSP430G2111 , MSP430G2112 , MSP430G2121 , MSP430G2131 , MSP430G2132 , MSP430G2152 , MSP430G2153 , MSP430G2201 , MSP430G2202 , MSP430G2203 , MSP430G2210 , MSP430G2211 , MSP430G2212 , MSP430G2213 , MSP430G2221 , MSP430G2230 , MSP430G2230-EP , MSP430G2231 , MSP430G2231-EP , MSP430G2232 , MSP430G2233 , MSP430G2252 , MSP430G2253 , MSP430G2302 , MSP430G2302-EP , MSP430G2303 , MSP430G2312 , MSP430G2313 , MSP430G2332 , MSP430G2332-EP , MSP430G2333 , MSP430G2352 , MSP430G2353 , MSP430G2402 , MSP430G2403 , MSP430G2412 , MSP430G2413 , MSP430G2432 , MSP430G2433 , MSP430G2444 , MSP430G2452 , MSP430G2453 , MSP430G2513 , MSP430G2533 , MSP430G2544 , MSP430G2553 , MSP430G2744 , MSP430G2755 , MSP430G2855 , MSP430G2955 , MSP430I2020 , MSP430I2021 , MSP430I2030 , MSP430I2031 , MSP430I2040 , MSP430I2041

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. Introduction
  3. Comparison of MSP430FR4xx and MSP430FR2xx Devices
  4. In-System Programming of Nonvolatile Memory
    1. 3.1 Ferroelectric RAM (FRAM) Overview
    2. 3.2 FRAM Cell
    3. 3.3 Protecting FRAM Using the Memory Write Protection Bit
    4. 3.4 FRAM Memory Wait States
    5. 3.5 Bootloader (BSL)
    6. 3.6 JTAG and Security
    7. 3.7 Production Programming
  5. Hardware Migration Considerations
  6. Device Calibration Information
  7. Important Device Specifications
  8. Core Architecture Considerations
    1. 7.1 Power Management Module (PMM)
      1. 7.1.1 Core LDO and LPM3.5 LDO
      2. 7.1.2 SVS
      3. 7.1.3 VREF
      4. 7.1.4 Debug in Low-Power Mode
    2. 7.2 Clock System
      1. 7.2.1 DCO Frequencies
      2. 7.2.2 FLL, REFO, and DCO Tap
      3. 7.2.3 FRAM Access at 16 MHz, ADC Clock, and Clocks-on-Demand
    3. 7.3 Operating Modes, Wake-up Times, and Reset
      1. 7.3.1 LPMx.5
      2. 7.3.2 Reset
        1. 7.3.2.1 Behavior of POR and BOR
        2. 7.3.2.2 Reset Generation
        3. 7.3.2.3 Determining the Cause of Reset
    4. 7.4 Interrupt Vectors
    5. 7.5 FRAM and the FRAM Controller
      1. 7.5.1 Flash and FRAM Overview Comparison
      2. 7.5.2 Cache Architecture
  9. Peripheral Considerations
    1. 8.1  Watchdog Timer
    2. 8.2  Ports
      1. 8.2.1 Digital Input/Output
      2. 8.2.2 Capacitive Touch I/O
    3. 8.3  Analog-to-Digital Converters
      1. 8.3.1 ADC10 to ADC
    4. 8.4  Communication Modules
      1. 8.4.1 USI to eUSCI
      2. 8.4.2 USCI to eUSCI
    5. 8.5  Timer and IR Modulation Logic
    6. 8.6  Backup Memory
    7. 8.7  Hardware Multiplier (MPY32)
    8. 8.8  RTC Counter
    9. 8.9  Interrupt Compare Controller (ICC)
    10. 8.10 LCD
    11. 8.11 Smart Analog Combo (SAC)
    12. 8.12 Comparator
  10. ROM Libraries
  11. 10Conclusion
  12. 11References
  13. 12Revision History

LPMx.5

Two new low-power modes introduced in the FR4xx family are LPM3.5 and LPM4.5. In both modes, the VCORE LDO is turned off, which powers down the digital core, RAM, and peripherals. To wake up from LPM3.5, RTC interrupts, LCD interrupts, oscillator fault, or port interrupts are required. All other system interrupts are not available. The RTC module and LCD module on the FR4xx device are powered from the LPM3.5 LDO rail and can, therefore, stay functional even when the core LDO is turned off. In LPM4.5, only port interrupts can be used to wake up the device.

It is important to understand that the LPMx.5 modes are inherently different from the typical LPMs (LPM0 through LPM4) in that a wakeup from these modes constitutes a device reset. Because RAM is not retained (except backup memory and LCD memory in LPM3.5), the state of the application (if stored in variables located in RAM) and register initialization are lost.

LPM3.5 is different from LPM4.5 for entering low-power mode and RAM retention.

  • The register setting is the same for entering LPM3.5 and LPM4.5. If the RTC or LCD is active, the FR4xx enters LPM3.5. If the RTC and LCD are off, the FR4xx enters LPM4.5. Measure the power supply current to determine the FR4xx power mode.
  • In LPM3.5, backup memory (32 bytes) and LCD memory (40 bytes) are retained. If the application must retain some data after wakeup from LPM3.5, these 72 bytes can be used. In addition, FRAM can also be used for storing data because FRAM is nonvolatile (see the FRAM special features in Section 3.1).

These LPMx.5 modes are suited for applications that spend large amounts of time in deep sleep and in which wake-up time is not critical. To decide which power mode is appropriate for the application, the frequency of wakeup needs to be considered because there is an energy penalty associated with the time spent during wakeup.

  • For example, an F2xx application that wakes up every 1 ms from LPM3 to sample a signal can be more efficiently ported to LPM3 in FR4xx rather than LPM3.5. This is because LPM3.5 requires approximately 350 µs to wake up, and the application would spend 35% of its duty cycle during wakeup, which significantly affects the power gains that were achieved in moving from LPM3 to LPM3.5.
  • Consider a different application that wakes up once per minute to update a time stamp. In this case, LPM3.5 could be a better fit for maximizing power savings because the average power during on time for LPM3.5 is 50% that of LPM3. Hence, selecting LPMs when migrating depends on the application and the on/off duty cycle that is required.