SNIA043A july   2021  – april 2023 TMP114 , TMP144

 

  1.   Abstract
  2.   Trademarks
  3. 1Introduction
  4. 2Heat Sink Temperature Sensor Monitoring
  5. 3Component Temperature Monitoring With Adjacent PCB Placement
  6. 4Under-Component Temperature Monitoring
    1. 4.1 Ultra-Thin Temperature Sensors
    2. 4.2 Designing an Under-Component Layout With the TMP114 Temperature Sensor
    3. 4.3 Under-Component Experimental Results
  7. 5Summary
  8. 6References
  9. 7Revision History

Under-Component Experimental Results

To further explore the topic of under-component temperature monitoring and test for accuracy and response time, a TMP114 temperature sensor was placed underneath the IWR6843 mmWave sensor on the IWR6843ISK evaluation board. The board layout files were modified to add the TMP114 temperature sensor footprint and then route the communication and power traces out to a header. This was to make sure that the operation of the radar board is not interrupted.

GUID-782B2A34-2173-4021-B038-81E7666FDAA5-low.png Figure 4-6 IWR6843ISK Evaluation Module

Correct operation of the modified radar board was confirmed using the MMWAVE Out of Box Demo. An xray image was also used to collect more information about the placement of the TMP114 temperature sensor underneath the IWR6843 mmWave sensor.

GUID-1B5F72C2-7EF0-46EF-9AE9-1CA8EAC7D044-low.png Figure 4-7 Xray Image of IWR6843 with TMP114 Temperature Sensor Underneath

To compare the performance of the under-component TMP114 temperature sensor, a TMP117 temperature sensor was placed next to the radar processor. This was designed so that both sensors can be interfaced with an MSP430 microcontroller to read back temperature data in the same 500-ms interval.

GUID-04629695-DAD0-4B31-A086-4214FBD05410-low.png Figure 4-8 TMP114 and TMP117 Temperature Sensor Testing Setup

The temperature rise as the IWR6843 mmWave sensor begins heating up can be seen in Figure 4-9, which shows the difference in thermal response and accuracy between the two devices. On average, the TMP117 temperature sensor measures 3.6°C below the TMP114 temperature sensor as the processor temperature increases. Additionally, the TMP114 temperature sensor is able to respond to the temperature rise much more rapidly, and this increase in thermal response time shows the effectiveness of this type of sensor placement. Table 4-1 shows how quickly each device reached 30°C, as well as each measurement at the end of the test run. Especially in systems that rely on over- or undertemperature shutdown mechanisms, fast thermal response, and higher accuracy can keep systems running longer by avoiding unnecessary shutdowns.

Table 4-1 Comparison of Thermal Response
Temperature Sensor Time to Reach 30 °C Temperature After 152.9 Seconds

TMP114

47.6 seconds

37.2109°C

TMP117

87.1 seconds

33.2421°C

GUID-20221128-SS0I-18PH-HVCN-WKNK6XJP7QXJ-low.svg Figure 4-9 TMP114 and TMP117 Temperature Comparison