SNOSAF2E February   2005  – May 2016 LMH6703

PRODUCTION DATA.  

  1. Features
  2. Applications
  3. Description
  4. Revision History
  5. Pin Configuration and Functions
  6. Specifications
    1. 6.1 Absolute Maximum Ratings
    2. 6.2 ESD Ratings
    3. 6.3 Recommended Operating Conditions
    4. 6.4 Thermal Information
    5. 6.5 Electrical Characteristics
  7. Typical Characteristics
  8. Detailed Description
    1. 8.1 Overview
    2. 8.2 Feature Description
    3. 8.3 Device Functional Modes
      1. 8.3.1 Feedback Resistor Selection
      2. 8.3.2 DC Accuracy and Noise
      3. 8.3.3 Enable/Disable
  9. Application and Implementation
    1. 9.1 Typical Application
      1. 9.1.1 Capacitive Load Drive
      2. 9.1.2 Video Performance
  10. 10Power Supply Recommendations
  11. 11Layout
    1. 11.1 Layout Guidelines
    2. 11.2 Layout Example
  12. 12Device and Documentation Support
    1. 12.1 Documentation Support
      1. 12.1.1 Related Documentation
    2. 12.2 Community Resources
    3. 12.3 Trademarks
    4. 12.4 Electrostatic Discharge Caution
    5. 12.5 Glossary
  13. 13Mechanical, Packaging, and Orderable Information

Package Options

Mechanical Data (Package|Pins)
Thermal pad, mechanical data (Package|Pins)
Orderable Information

11 Layout

11.1 Layout Guidelines

Whenever questions about layout arise, use the evaluation board (see Table 1) as a guide. The LMH730216 is the evaluation board for SOT-23-6 samples and the LMH730227 is the evaluation board for SOIC samples.

To reduce parasitic capacitances, ground and power planes should be removed near the input and output pins. Components in the feedback path should be placed as close to the device as possible to minimize parasitic capacitance. For long signal paths controlled impedance lines should be used, along with impedance matching elements at both ends.

Bypass capacitors should be placed as close to the device as possible. Bypass capacitors from each voltage rail to ground are applied in pairs. The larger electrolytic bypass capacitors can be located further from the device, the smaller ceramic bypass capacitors should be placed as close to the device as possible. In Figure 29 and Figure 30, CSS is optional, but is recommended for best second order harmonic distortion.

Generally, a good high frequency layout will keep power supply and ground traces away from the inverting input and output pins. Parasitic capacitances on these nodes to ground will cause frequency response peaking and possible circuit oscillations. See Frequent Faux Pas in Applying Wideband Current Feedback Amplifiers, Application Note OA-15 (SNOA367). The evaluation board(s) is a good example of high frequency layout techniques as a reference.

General high-speed, signal-path layout suggestions include:

  • Continuous ground planes are preferred for signal routing, as shown in Figure 33 and Figure 34, with matched impedance traces for longer runs. However, open up both ground and power planes around the capacitive sensitive input and output device pins.
  • Use good, high-frequency decoupling capacitors (0.1 μF) on the ground plane at the device power pins as shown in Figure 33. Higher value capacitors (2.2 μF) are required, but may be placed further from the device power pins and shared among devices. For best high-frequency decoupling, consider X2Y supply-decoupling capacitors that offer a much higher self-resonance frequency over standard capacitors.
  • When using differential signal routing over any appreciable distance, use microstrip layout techniques with matched impedance traces.
  • The input summing junction is very sensitive to parasitic capacitance. Connect any Rf, and Rg elements into the summing junction with minimal trace length to the device pin side of the resistor, as shown in Figure 34. The other side of these elements can have more trace length if needed to the source or to ground.

Table 1. Evaluation Boards

DEVICE PACKAGE EVALUATION BOARD PART NUMBER
LMH6703MF SOT-23-6 LMH730216
LMH6703MA SOIC LMH730227

11.2 Layout Example

LMH6703 Layer1.png Figure 33. Evaluation Board Layer 1
LMH6703 Layer2.png Figure 34. Evaluation Board Layer 2