SLAZ625W August   2014  – May 2021 MSP430FR2033

 

  1. 1Functional Advisories
  2. 2Preprogrammed Software Advisories
  3. 3Debug Only Advisories
  4. 4Fixed by Compiler Advisories
  5. 5Nomenclature, Package Symbolization, and Revision Identification
    1. 5.1 Device Nomenclature
    2. 5.2 Package Markings
      1.      DGG48
      2.      DGG56
      3.      PM64
    3. 5.3 Memory-Mapped Hardware Revision (TLV Structure)
  6. 6Advisory Descriptions
    1. 6.1  ADC39
    2. 6.2  ADC50
    3. 6.3  ADC63
    4. 6.4  CPU21
    5. 6.5  CPU22
    6. 6.6  CPU40
    7. 6.7  CPU46
    8. 6.8  CS11
    9. 6.9  CS13
    10. 6.10 EEM23
    11. 6.11 EEM28
    12. 6.12 EEM30
    13. 6.13 GC1
    14. 6.14 GC4
    15. 6.15 GC5
    16. 6.16 PMM32
    17. 6.17 PORT28
    18. 6.18 RTC15
    19. 6.19 SYS23
    20. 6.20 USCI41
    21. 6.21 USCI42
    22. 6.22 USCI45
    23. 6.23 USCI47
    24. 6.24 USCI50
  7. 7Revision History

6.15 GC5

GC Module

Category

Functional

Function

Nonexistent FRAM failures can be detected after wake-up from LPM 1/2/3/4

Description

The FRAM bit error detection may indicate bit errors, even the memory has no failure, after wakeup from LPM1/2/3/4.
Based on the setting inside the FRAM controller registers (GCCTL0), following behaviors can appear.

1. Unexpected PUC for an uncorrectable FRAM error can be triggered and causing the corresponding value in the SYSRSTIV register.
This happens only if GCCTL0.UBDRSTEN =1.

2. Unexpected NMI for an uncorrectable FRAM error can be triggered and causing the corresponding value in the SYSSNIV register.
This happens only if the GCCTL0.UBDIE = 1.

3. Unexpected NMI for a correctable FRAM error can be triggered and causing the corresponding value in the SYSSNIV register.
This happens only if the GCCTL0.CBDIE =1.

Workaround

1. Disable PUC (GCCTL0.UBDRSTEN=0), UBDIE and CBDIE interrupts (GCCTL0.UBDIE=0 and GCCTL0.CBDIE=0) prior to entering LPM 1/2/3/4.  

2. After LPM wake up, clear GCCTL1.UBDIFG and GCCTL1.CBDIFG, and then reinitialize the GCCTL0 register after the first valid FRAM access has been completed. For the valid FRAM access the user has to consider possible cache hits which depends on implementation.