TIDUE90 July   2018

 

  1.    Description
  2.    Resources
  3.    Features
  4.    Applications
  5.    Design Images
  6. 1System Description
    1. 1.1 Key System Specifications
  7. 2System Overview
    1. 2.1 Block Diagram
    2. 2.2 Design Considerations
      1. 2.2.1 Classification of Scenarios With Liquid Present
      2. 2.2.2 Liquid Influence on Capacitive Touch Sensing
      3. 2.2.3 Self Capacitance and Mutual Capacitance
        1. 2.2.3.1 Self Capacitance
        2. 2.2.3.2 Mutual Capacitance
      4. 2.2.4 Other Considerations
    3. 2.3 Highlighted Products
      1. 2.3.1 MSP430FR2633
    4. 2.4 System Design Theory
      1. 2.4.1 Shield Sensor Electrodes
      2. 2.4.2 Mutual Capacitance Shielding
      3. 2.4.3 Design for Noise Immunity
      4. 2.4.4 Power Supply Grounding Effect
  8. 3Hardware, Software, Test Requirements, and Test Results
    1. 3.1 Required Hardware and Software
      1. 3.1.1 Hardware
      2. 3.1.2 Software
    2. 3.2 Test and Results
      1. 3.2.1 Liquid Test With Well Grounded Power Supply
        1. 3.2.1.1 Continuous Water Flow Test
        2. 3.2.1.2 Continuous Water Spray Test
      2. 3.2.2 Conductive Noise Immunity Test
      3. 3.2.3 Liquid Test With Battery-Powered Supply
        1. 3.2.3.1 Continuous Water Flow Test
        2. 3.2.3.2 Continuous Water Spray Test
      4. 3.2.4 Third Party Test Report
  9. 4Design Files
    1. 4.1 Schematics
    2. 4.2 Bill of Materials
    3. 4.3 PCB Layout Recommendations
      1. 4.3.1 Layout Prints
    4. 4.4 Altium Project
    5. 4.5 Gerber Files
    6. 4.6 Assembly Drawings
  10. 5Software Files
  11. 6Related Documentation
    1. 6.1 Trademarks
  12. 7About the Author

3.2.3.2 Continuous Water Spray Test

Figure 27 shows that the sensors are calibrated at a baseline count of 350, and a touch increases the count to approximately 450 in dry conditions. The increased delta is smaller compare than in the well grounded power supply scenario. When the spray water is applied on the touch sensor area, the data shows the "negative touch" behavior (see Section 2.2.3.2). The water spray causes the measurement result to go in the opposite direction of a touch event, so no false touch is detected. While the water is continuously spraying on the touch sensor area, each touch event still causes a count increase, and the touched button is still distinguishable. The sensitivity under the water spray condition is comparable with the sensitivity under the dry condition, which means that the touch threshold can be set to reliably work for both dry and spray water conditions.

TIDM-1021 D014_TIDUE90.gifFigure 27. Sensor Count Result With Continuous Water Spray (Battery Power)