SLVAFP1 February   2024 TPS54KB20

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
  5. 2Butterfly Footprint Analysis
    1. 2.1 Efficiency
    2. 2.2 Thermal Performance
  6. 3Symmetrical Footprint
  7. 4Asymmetrical Footprint
  8. 5Test Data
  9. 6Summary
  10. 7References

Introduction

The report objective is to interpret the distinctive butterfly-style footprint of the TPS54KB20 and how it is affected by removal of input capacitors from one side of the IC, resulting in an asymmetrical configuration. This particular buck converter falls under the TPS54KB2x device family, using an adaptive on-time D-CAP4 control mode, and supporting up to 25A of output current. TPS54KB2x's butterfly footprint proves to exhibit greater efficiency and enhanced device performance compared to its predecessor part. Considering users may seek the reduction of input capacitors to achieve further design flexibility, this device family allows the possibility of using a single VIN rail along with removing numerous input capacitors on one side of the IC package. This application note provides data on how further input capacitor reduction can affect efficiency and SW-node ringing during operation. Bench data is documented presenting SW-node ringing and efficiency results of the alternative input capacitor configuration. The report analyzes the TPS54KB20 SW-node ringing trade-offs when removing input capacitors asymmetrically on one side of the device, reducing area and cost. The data in this report refers to the TPS54KB20 U2 design EVM.