TIDUES0E June   2019  – April 2024 TMS320F28P550SJ , TMS320F28P559SJ-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Description
  3.   Resources
  4.   Features
  5.   Applications
  6.   6
  7. 1System Description
    1. 1.1 Key System Specifications
  8. 2System Overview
    1. 2.1 Block Diagram
    2. 2.2 Highlighted Products
      1. 2.2.1  UCC21710
      2. 2.2.2  UCC14141-Q1
      3. 2.2.3  AMC1311
      4. 2.2.4  AMC1302
      5. 2.2.5  OPA320
      6. 2.2.6  AMC1306M05
      7. 2.2.7  AMC1336
      8. 2.2.8  TMCS1133
      9. 2.2.9  TMS320F280039C
      10. 2.2.10 TLVM13620
      11. 2.2.11 ISOW1044
      12. 2.2.12 TPS2640
    3. 2.3 System Design Theory
      1. 2.3.1 Dual Active Bridge Analogy With Power Systems
      2. 2.3.2 Dual-Active Bridge – Switching Sequence
      3. 2.3.3 Dual-Active Bridge – Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS)
      4. 2.3.4 Dual-Active Bridge - Design Considerations
        1. 2.3.4.1 Leakage Inductor
        2. 2.3.4.2 Soft Switching Range
        3. 2.3.4.3 Effect of Inductance on Current
        4. 2.3.4.4 Phase Shift
        5. 2.3.4.5 Capacitor Selection
          1. 2.3.4.5.1 DC-Blocking Capacitors
        6. 2.3.4.6 Switching Frequency
        7. 2.3.4.7 Transformer Selection
        8. 2.3.4.8 SiC MOSFET Selection
      5. 2.3.5 Loss Analysis
        1. 2.3.5.1 SiC MOSFET and Diode Losses
        2. 2.3.5.2 Transformer Losses
        3. 2.3.5.3 Inductor Losses
        4. 2.3.5.4 Gate Driver Losses
        5. 2.3.5.5 Efficiency
        6. 2.3.5.6 Thermal Considerations
  9. 3Circuit Description
    1. 3.1 Power Stage
    2. 3.2 DC Voltage Sensing
      1. 3.2.1 Primary DC Voltage Sensing
      2. 3.2.2 Secondary DC Voltage Sensing
        1. 3.2.2.1 Secondary Side Battery Voltage Sensing
    3. 3.3 Current Sensing
    4. 3.4 Power Architecture
      1. 3.4.1 Auxiliary Power Supply
      2. 3.4.2 Gate Driver Bias Power Supply
      3. 3.4.3 Isolated Power Supply for Sense Circuits
    5. 3.5 Gate Driver Circuit
    6. 3.6 Additional Circuitry
    7. 3.7 Simulation
      1. 3.7.1 Setup
      2. 3.7.2 Running Simulations
  10. 4Hardware, Software, Testing Requirements, and Test Results
    1. 4.1 Required Hardware and Software
      1. 4.1.1 Hardware
      2. 4.1.2 Software
        1. 4.1.2.1 Getting Started With Software
        2. 4.1.2.2 Pin Configuration
        3. 4.1.2.3 PWM Configuration
        4. 4.1.2.4 High-Resolution Phase Shift Configuration
        5. 4.1.2.5 ADC Configuration
        6. 4.1.2.6 ISR Structure
    2. 4.2 Test Setup
    3. 4.3 PowerSUITE GUI
    4. 4.4 LABs
      1. 4.4.1 Lab 1
      2. 4.4.2 Lab 2
      3. 4.4.3 Lab 3
      4. 4.4.4 Lab 4
      5. 4.4.5 Lab 5
      6. 4.4.6 Lab 6
      7. 4.4.7 Lab 7
    5. 4.5 Test Results
      1. 4.5.1 Closed-Loop Performance
  11. 5Design Files
    1. 5.1 Schematics
    2. 5.2 Bill of Materials
    3. 5.3 Altium Project
    4. 5.4 Gerber Files
    5. 5.5 Assembly Drawings
  12. 6Related Documentation
    1. 6.1 Trademarks
  13. 7Terminology
  14. 8About the Author
  15. 9Revision History

2.3.4.8 SiC MOSFET Selection

As shown in Figure 2-1, the main power stage switching devices of the primary and secondary must block the full input and output DC voltages. SiC switches were chosen for the following reasons:

  • The switching speed of the SiC MOSFET is faster than a traditional Si device, thereby reducing switching losses.
  • The reverse recovery charge is significantly smaller in the SiC MOSFET for the DAB application, resulting in reduced voltage and current overshoot.
  • Lower state resistance significantly reduces conduction losses during on time of the device.
  • The switches have the ability to block higher voltages without breaking down.

For this design, 1200-V Cree® devices with on-state resistance of 75 mΩ were used on the primary side, and a 900 V, voltage-blocking Cree device with on-state resistance of 30 mΩ was used in the secondary. Both are four-pin devices with a Kelvin connection for better switching performance. The actual conduction and switching loss calculations are shown in the following sections.