SPRACC0A November   2017  – November 2020 TMS320F28075 , TMS320F28075-Q1 , TMS320F28076 , TMS320F28374D , TMS320F28374S , TMS320F28375D , TMS320F28375S , TMS320F28375S-Q1 , TMS320F28376D , TMS320F28376S , TMS320F28377D , TMS320F28377D-EP , TMS320F28377D-Q1 , TMS320F28377S , TMS320F28377S-Q1 , TMS320F28378D , TMS320F28378S , TMS320F28379D , TMS320F28379D-Q1

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. Introduction and Scope
  3. SRAM Bit Array
  4. Sources of SRAM Failures
    1. 3.1 Manufacturing Defects
      1. 3.1.1 Time Zero Fails
      2. 3.1.2 Latent Fails
    2. 3.2 Circuit Drift With Usage
    3. 3.3 Circuit Overstress
    4. 3.4 Soft Errors
      1. 3.4.1 Radioactive Events
      2. 3.4.2 Dynamic Voltage Events
      3. 3.4.3 Summary of Error Sources
  5. Methods for Managing Memory Failures in Electronic Systems
    1. 4.1 Start-Up Testing
    2. 4.2 In-System Testing
    3. 4.3 Parity Detection
    4. 4.4 Error Detection and Correction (EDAC)
    5. 4.5 Redundancy
  6. Comparisons and Conclusions
  7. C2000 Memory Types Example
    1. 6.1 TMS320F2837xD
  8. Memory Types
    1. 7.1 Dedicated RAM (Mx and Dx RAM)
    2. 7.2 Local Shared RAM (LSx RAM)
    3. 7.3 Global Shared RAM (GSx RAM)
    4. 7.4 CPU Message RAM (CPU MSGRAM)
    5. 7.5 CLA Message RAM (CLA MSGRAM)
  9. Summary
  10. References
  11. 10Revision History

Methods for Managing Memory Failures in Electronic Systems

This section presents a number of methods available for managing memory failures in electronic systems. While specifically targeting SRAM, most of the information applies to other memories such as ROM and FLASH. The description is from the perspective of a system designer or integrator, but considers the previous discussions tied to integrated circuit devices.

Even within the realm of safety considerations there are different perspectives towards managing memory failures.

  • Safe State: Taking the system to a safe state when an error has been identified.
  • System Availability: Continuing to run in some cases when an error has been identified.
  • Fail Safe: System continues properly even when an error has been identified.

Each of these three perspectives adds cost to the system. Depending upon the requirements of the market, the additional cost may be easily justified. Alternatively, these additional costs may be prohibitive in other target markets.