SLYA060 August   2022 TMAG5110 , TMAG5110-Q1 , TMAG5111 , TMAG5111-Q1

 

  1.   Abstract
  2.   Trademarks
  3. Introduction
  4. System Block Diagram
  5. Key System Specifications
  6. HW Connections
  7. Software
    1. 5.1 TI-RSLK LaunchPad Software
    2. 5.2 LaunchPad Software
  8. How to Design With Hall-Effect Latches
  9. Simulation Results
    1. 7.1 Select Device Sensitivity
    2. 7.2 Select Axis of Sensitivity
  10. Performance Comparison
    1. 8.1 Speed and Direction
    2. 8.2 Power Consumption
    3. 8.3 Susceptibility to External Particles
  11. Encoder Board Schematic and Image
  12. 10Summary

Power Consumption

To test the power consumption of each encoder systems, we disconnected the encorders from the TI-RSLK system and powered them separately. In doing so, we are able to isolate the power consumption required by each encoder technology. The TMAG5111 encoder board showed a clear advantage over its optical counterpart, consuming 5 mA during operation (Figure 8-4), while the IR encoder board consumed a total of 20 mA during operation (Figure 8-5). Adding another IR encoder for direction would most likely double the power consumption, all while the Hall-effect board would remain at 5 mA because both the speed and direction are included in one device.

GUID-20220705-SS0I-FXS3-S54N-0XMDSKJZ61RL-low.jpgFigure 8-4 TMAG5111 Encoder Current Consumption.
GUID-20220705-SS0I-FWQV-N6XJ-30LSLRW1NJ6P-low.jpgFigure 8-5 IR Encoder Current Consumption.