SLYT882 October 2026 LMG708B0
The 48VIN, 960W Four-Phase Buck Converter with Integrated GaN Reference Design was used to evaluate the thermal-focused design considerations. Distributing the load across four interleaved integrated GaN phases reduces the current and power dissipation in each phase while simultaneously supporting high output-current capability and compact solution size that 48V power conversion requires. Table 1 lists the overall design specifications.
| Design parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Input voltage | 48V (36V to 60V) |
| Output voltage | 12V |
| Output current | 80A (electrical design and thermal design current) |
| Topology | Four-phase synchronous buck |
| Switching frequency | 400kHz (each phase) |
| Power stage | Four LMG708B0 devices |
| Reference design number | PMP23595 |
To evaluate the resulting temperature distribution and heat flow through the package, cooling structure, and PCB a thermal simulation was conducted. The thermal simulation was created using Ansys Icepak® thermal modeling software tool. Figure 2 shows the steady-state thermal simulation of the four-phase buck converter at the full 960W output at an ambient temperature of 25℃ with no airflow, and 6.29W of power dissipation assigned to each of the four LMG708B0 devices. The power dissipation was calculated by obtaining the total power losses of the reference design at the full 960W output under the 25℃ ambient temperature condition and subtracting the losses generated from the surrounding passives, leaving only the losses generated by the LMG708B0 devices. The device power dissipation corresponded to 25.16W of total power dissipation across the four phases. The simulated package temperatures are approximately 108℃ across the four phases, still well below the recommended case temperature of the LMG708B0 device, which is 135℃.

The simulation also illustrates the thermal paths from the integrated GaN devices through both the dual-side cooling structure and the PCB. However, the simulation represents an approximation of the final hardware implementation. The modeled heat-sink geometry differs slightly from the final heat sink and does not account for the thermal interface material (TIM) used between the LMG708B0 packages and the heat sink. The TIM introduces additional case-to-sink thermal impedance that can affect the overall thermal performance of the dual-side cooling path. Therefore, the simulated temperatures provide a thermal reference for comparison with the measured converter performance discussed later in the article.