SNIS245B September 2025 – July 2026 ISOTMP35R-Q1
PRODUCTION DATA
Comparison to NTC thermistors highlights the benefit of direct thermal coupling enabled by the ISOTMP35R-Q1. In this test, heat is applied through a high-voltage copper plane connected to the TSENSE pins, while the low-voltage side remains at 25°C. A temperature step of 100°C (25°C to 125°C) is applied at the heat source. This condition represents applications where the temperature of interest is localized at the heat source rather than uniformly distributed across the package.
Figure 7-9 shows the test configurations for the ISOTMP35R-Q1 and discrete NTC implementations. The ISOTMP35R-Q1 is thermally coupled directly to the heat source through the TSENSE pins. In contrast, the NTC thermistors are positioned approximately 8mm away and rely on heat transfer through PCB material and, in one configuration, a thermal conductive epoxy.
Figure 7-10 shows the measured thermal response of the ISOTMP35R-Q1 compared to two NTC configurations: with and without thermal epoxy.
As summarized in Table 7-2, the ISOTMP35R-Q1 reaches the final temperature significantly faster and remains closer to the 125°C reference during the transient response. This behavior results from the direct thermal coupling through the TSENSE pins, which minimizes thermal resistance between the heat source and the sensing element.
| Parameter | ISOTMP35R-Q1 | NTC (with Epoxy) | NTC (without Epoxy) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal Coupling Path | Direct (through TSENSE pins) | Remote (FR-4 PCB with thermal epoxy) | Remote (FR-4 PCB conductive path only) |
| Coupling Material Conductivity | Copper: 400W/mK | Epoxy: 3.7W/mK | FR-4: 0.2W/mK |
| Distance from Heat Source | Directly coupled | 8mm | 8mm |
| Response Time (τ63%) | 4.7s | 75.0s | 90.5s |
| Response Time (τ86%) | 24.6s | 143.4s | 173.6s |
| Final Temperature | 121.5°C | 92.5°C | 90.5°C |
Thermal conductivity values shown are representative bulk values of the primary materials in the thermal coupling path and are provided for relative comparison only. Effective thermal response depends on the complete thermal path, including geometry, interface thickness, contact area, and PCB construction.
In contrast, NTC implementations introduce additional thermal resistance and delay due to physical separation from the heat source and the presence of intermediate materials. The use of thermal epoxy improves conduction compared to a bare NTC, but still results in slower response and increased deviation from the reference temperature.
Additional details on test methodology, thermal modeling, and system-level considerations are provided in application note Improving Thermal Response Time and Accuracy in High- Voltage Applications.