STDA034 May   2026 F29H859TU-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2. 1Executive Summary
  3. 2Why Traction System Efficiency Matters
  4. 3Optimal Pulse Positioning: A New Modulation Strategy
  5. 4Key Challenges to Implement OPP and How TI Has Solved Them
  6. 5Synchronous PWM Pulse Generation
  7. 6SVPWM to OPP Transition
  8. 7Dynamic Response and Robust Closed-Loop Control
  9. 8Conclusion

Dynamic Response and Robust Closed-Loop Control

While one can hope for good conditions, real-world systems always introduces periodic anomalies or disturbances. The motor current can be disturbed any of the following:

  • SVPWM to OPP transition
  • Changing number of OPP pulses
  • Torque request change (driver input)

Closed loop and active control that address each of these cases are critical in realizing a complete and robust OPP design.

Because active control cannot be done by traditional FOC (Field-Oriented Control) alone, flux control is necessary. Flux control is highly complex and introduces three sub-challenges:

  • Flux reference: what flux must be.
  • Flux observer: actual flux. This is difficult because flux cannot be measured.
  • Flux controller: corrective action and calculations to minimize flux error

TI has designed a flux controller to achieve robust, closed-loop control – which is highly computation-intensive and complex. C29 CPU addresses this with industry-leading real-time performance, showing more than 2.5x better performance versus other competitor MCUs in the traction inverter market (benchmarked by leading Automotive TIER1). The hardware-based TMU (Trigonometric Math Unit) feature significantly offloads specific math functions from the C29 CPU, helping further improve performance. The figure below showcases TI's OPP design validated for stable closed-loop control.

 Stable Closed-Loop Control Figure 7-1 Stable Closed-Loop Control