STDA053 October   2026 DP83TC813R-Q1 , DP83TC813S-Q1 , DP83TC815-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
  5. 2Problem Statement on Current Legacy Parts Communication Topology and Ethernet Advantage
  6. 3The Ethernet Advantage
  7. 4The Critical Hurdle: Power Delivery in the Ethernet Shift
  8. 5The Answer: Power Over Data Line (PoDL)
  9. 6Implementation Challenges and Mitigation
  10. 7Conclusion

Problem Statement on Current Legacy Parts Communication Topology and Ethernet Advantage

Traditionally, radar sensors relied on low-bandwidth protocols such as CAN, LIN, and so forth. While sufficient for simple object detection, these protocols fail to meet the requirements of modern radar system for several reasons:

  • Bandwidth Bottlenecks: High-resolution imaging radar generates massive raw data streams that overwhelm legacy buses. The standards of ADAS level 2+ and 3+ require higher antenna counts, wider bandwidth, and raw data output in the radar application.
  • Localized Computing: Since CAN and LIN cannot support the necessary throughput, most radar processing must be performed in a dedicated radar ECU rather than in a central compute or IVI system. Consequently, less raw data is available to the ADAS stack, which reduces measurement accuracy and overall system performance.
  • Latency and Jitter: Real-time autonomous decision-making requires deterministic data delivery. Legacy protocols lack the robust time-sensitive networking (TSN) capabilities required to synchronize radar data with a different sensor.
  • Complex Topologies: Legacy automotive systems are a combination of multiple interfaces: A CAN interface for radar and an Ethernet for backbone communication. This combination introduces complex system hardware and software development.

Legacy systems require separate wiring harnesses for power and data, increasing the complexity of the electrical architecture of the vehicle.