SLAA843A August   2018  – March 2019 MSP430FR2512 , MSP430FR2512 , MSP430FR2522 , MSP430FR2522 , MSP430FR2532 , MSP430FR2532 , MSP430FR2533 , MSP430FR2533 , MSP430FR2632 , MSP430FR2632 , MSP430FR2633 , MSP430FR2633

 

  1.   Sensitivity, SNR, and design margin in capacitive touch applications
    1.     Trademarks
    2. 1 Overview
      1. 1.1 Design Objectives
        1. 1.1.1 Reliability
        2. 1.1.2 Robustness
      2. 1.2 The Designer's Dilemma
    3. 2 Recommended Actions for Developers
      1. 2.1 Run SNR and Design Margin Tests
    4. 3 Terminology
      1. 3.1 Signal (S)
      2. 3.2 Noise (N)
      3. 3.3 Threshold (Sensitivity) (Th)
      4. 3.4 Design Margin
        1. 3.4.1 False Detection Margin (Min)
        2. 3.4.2 Detection Margin (Mout)
      5. 3.5 Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)
      6. 3.6 Advice
    5. 4 CapTIvate Device Performance
      1. 4.1 Minimum Recommended Values
      2. 4.2 CapTIvate Device SNR
    6. 5 Interpreting the Results
      1. 5.1 Interpreting the Advice
      2. 5.2 Check Other Results
    7. 6 Application of Terms
      1. 6.1 Count and Percent Change Analysis With 7.5-mm Overlay, Advice = POOR
      2. 6.2 Count and Percent Change Analysis With 1.5-mm Overlay, Advice = GOOD
      3. 6.3 Count and Percent Change Analysis (1.5-mm Overlay vs 7.5-mm Overlay)
      4. 6.4 Effect of Post-Processing and Sampling Rate
    8. 7 Summary
  2.   Revision History

6.3 Count and Percent Change Analysis (1.5-mm Overlay vs 7.5-mm Overlay)

Table 6 shows a count and percent change analysis comparison between the two different thickness overlay with the same sensor panel board.

Table 6. 1.5-mm Overlay vs 7.5-mm Overlay

Parameter CAPTIVATE-BSWP Panel Board With 1.5-mm Overlay Results (%) CAPTIVATE-BSWP Panel Board With 7.5-mm Overlay Results (%) Minimum Recommended Value (%)
Signal (S) 7.8 0.82
Minimum signal (Slow) 7.7 0.73
Noise (N) 0.12 0.12
Threshold (Th) 4.5 0.5 0.9
Margin in (MIn) 4.38 0.38 0.83
Margin out (Mout) 3.2 0.23
Advice GOOD POOR