SLAA843A August   2018  – March 2019 MSP430FR2512 , MSP430FR2512 , MSP430FR2522 , MSP430FR2522 , MSP430FR2532 , MSP430FR2532 , MSP430FR2533 , MSP430FR2533 , MSP430FR2632 , MSP430FR2632 , MSP430FR2633 , MSP430FR2633

 

  1.   Sensitivity, SNR, and design margin in capacitive touch applications
    1.     Trademarks
    2. 1 Overview
      1. 1.1 Design Objectives
        1. 1.1.1 Reliability
        2. 1.1.2 Robustness
      2. 1.2 The Designer's Dilemma
    3. 2 Recommended Actions for Developers
      1. 2.1 Run SNR and Design Margin Tests
    4. 3 Terminology
      1. 3.1 Signal (S)
      2. 3.2 Noise (N)
      3. 3.3 Threshold (Sensitivity) (Th)
      4. 3.4 Design Margin
        1. 3.4.1 False Detection Margin (Min)
        2. 3.4.2 Detection Margin (Mout)
      5. 3.5 Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)
      6. 3.6 Advice
    5. 4 CapTIvate Device Performance
      1. 4.1 Minimum Recommended Values
      2. 4.2 CapTIvate Device SNR
    6. 5 Interpreting the Results
      1. 5.1 Interpreting the Advice
      2. 5.2 Check Other Results
    7. 6 Application of Terms
      1. 6.1 Count and Percent Change Analysis With 7.5-mm Overlay, Advice = POOR
      2. 6.2 Count and Percent Change Analysis With 1.5-mm Overlay, Advice = GOOD
      3. 6.3 Count and Percent Change Analysis (1.5-mm Overlay vs 7.5-mm Overlay)
      4. 6.4 Effect of Post-Processing and Sampling Rate
    8. 7 Summary
  2.   Revision History

The Designer's Dilemma

Because getting the best performance possible sometimes involves giving up some robustness, and it is very difficult (if not impossible) to predict or test all of the ways an end user will use a product, the capacitive touch designer is often left with critical decisions that need to be made to satisfy all of the competing design objectives (functional, integration, financial, reliability, and robustness). Ultimately, the balance between performance and robustness varies by the type of product and the market into which it is sold.

To aid the designer in effectively balancing these two critical trade offs, this document presents a set of useful terms to make reliability and robustness easier to understand. Furthermore, this document also provides a procedure for assessing the reliability and robustness of a capacitive touch application using CapTIvate technology.