SNAS739E June 2018 – December 2025 LMX2615-SP
PRODUCTION DATA
Another strategy is to select an inductor (L) pullup. This allows a higher impedance without any concern of creating any DC drop across the component. Ideally, the inductor must be chosen large enough so that the impedance is high relative to the load impedance and also be operating away from the self-resonant frequency. For instance, consider a 3.3nH pullup inductor with a self-resonant frequency of 7GHz driving a 50Ω spectrum analyzer input. This inductor theoretically has j50Ω input impedance around 2.4GHz. At this frequency, this in parallel with load is about 35Ω, which is a 3dB power reduction. At 1.4GHz, this inductor has impedance of about j29Ω. This in parallel with the 50Ω load has a magnitude of 25Ω, which is the same as with a 50Ω pullup. The main issue with the inductor pullup is the impedance does not look nicely matched to the load.
As the output impedance is not so nicely matched, but there is higher output power, using a resistive pad is desired to get the best impedance control. A 6dB pad (R1 = 18Ω, R2 = 68Ω) is likely more attenuation than necessary. A 3dB or even 1dB pad can suffice. Two AC-coupling capacitor is required before the pad. In the configuration shown in Figure 7-4, one of them is placed to ground to minimize the number of components in the high frequency path for lower loss.
For the resistive pad, Table 7-2 shows some common values:
| ATTENUATION (dB) | R1 (Ω) | R2 (Ω) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7 | 420 |
| 2 | 5.6 | 220 |
| 3 | 6.8 | 150 |
| 4 | 12 | 100 |
| 5 | 15 | 82 |
| 6 | 18 | 68 |