SNAU265D June   2021  – February 2025 HDC3020 , HDC3020-Q1 , HDC3021 , HDC3021-Q1 , HDC3022 , HDC3022-Q1 , HDC3120 , HDC3120-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1HDC3x Devices
    1. 1.1 HDC3x2x Package Comparison
    2. 1.2 HDC3020 in WSON
    3. 1.3 HDC3021 in WSON
    4. 1.4 HDC3022 in WSON
    5.     HDC3120 in WSON
  5. 2Storage and Handling Guidelines
    1. 2.1 Exposure to Contaminants
    2. 2.2 Chemical Analysis
      1. 2.2.1 Saturation and Recovery Tests
      2. 2.2.2 Long-Term Exposure
    3. 2.3 Packaging and Storing
      1. 2.3.1 Assembly
      2. 2.3.2 Application in Extreme Environment
  6. 3Programming the HDC3020
    1. 3.1 The Functional Modes
    2. 3.2 Trigger-On Demand
    3. 3.3 Auto Measurement
    4. 3.4 Programming the CRC
      1. 3.4.1 CRC C Code
    5. 3.5 Example Code
    6. 3.6 Condensation Removal
    7. 3.7 Offset Error Correction
      1. 3.7.1 Offset Error Correction Example With a Fingerboard
  7. 4References
  8. 5Revision History

Offset Error Correction Example With a Fingerboard

The fingerboard was designed for test and characterization purposes. The fingerboard has a dimension of 677mils x 942mils (17.2mm x 23.9mm) and an overall thickness of 62mils (1.6mm). The fingerboard has two cutouts (approximately 55mils, or 1.4mm) on either side of the DUT that makes this a good layout to verify the offset error correction algorithm. They are made with Rogers RO4350B dielectric (instead of FR4). The thermal pad is soldered down, but the thermal pad itself is not grounded, it is just a floating copper pad. However, even with these cutouts, the board itself is pretty thick, which led to some heat rise challenges during this process. If a user wants to design a board similar to this, make sure that the board is not too thick.

HDC3020 HDC3020 Fingerboard Figure 3-7 HDC3020 Fingerboard

Table 3-3 and Table 3-4 show the look up tables for the HDC3020 fingerboard. The LUT was generated using 30 HDC3020 devices and were tested between 15°C – 30°C in increments of 5°C and between 10% – 45% RH in increments of 2.5%RH. The look-up tables were generated at 3.3V and 5V, and both were operated at the full power setting. Al the devices were placed in the chamber and the temperature rise was calculated for each temperature and humidity set point.

Table 3-3 Look Up Table (LUT) for a Fingerboard Operated at Heater Full Power at 3.3V
Temp [°C]
%RH
15 20 25 30
10 32.99248 30.94213 31.77977 31.92152
12.5 34.57237 32.34282 33.92634 34.64464
15 36.35748 34.06128 36.43301 37.84657
17.5 38.29194 36.10141 38.93244 40.86322
20 40.32502 38.1553 41.43969 43.36861
22.5 42.32662 40.32751 43.56603 45.46563
25 44.12985 42.3089 45.44633 46.89262
27.5 45.68952 44.20545 46.94305 47.7198
30 47.13836 45.81257 48.01137 48.39375
32.5 48.32647 47.2488 48.72053 48.77972
35 49.34081 48.5207 49.25917 48.98883
37.5 49.90921 49.28729 49.61261 49.08352
40 50.28725 49.79383 49.83082 49.05558
42.5 50.62314 50.11981 49.91169 49.05743
45 50.7908 50.33693 49.893 49.05599
Table 3-4 Look Up Table (LUT) for Fingerboard Operated at Heater Half Power at 5V
RH [%]/
Temp [°C]
15 20 25 30
10 51.8946 50.34679 49.82128 49.10057
12.5 51.90337 50.78616 50.21534 49.50523
15 52.8088 50.78637 50.22602 49.52433
17.5 52.79793 50.7915 50.65976 50.00581
20 54.92752 50.78842 50.67655 50.46326
22.5 56.16217 50.80301 51.10399 52.07121
25 56.1347 51.28634 51.84768 52.80945
27.5 57.28141 51.27524 53.91814 54.60268
30 57.92458 52.56686 54.168 55.72237
32.5 59.45811 54.03698 55.29393 59.11533
35 61.33097 54.98721 56.11429 59.89979
37.5 58.79358 56.00296 57.56867 61.67453
40 59.39689 56.03048 60.44079 63.05386
42.5 59.8415 57.39132 60.17739 64.75773
45 60.73339 58.20351 61.19516 65.86387