SBAA449B October   2020  – October 2021 TMAG5110 , TMAG5110-Q1 , TMAG5111 , TMAG5111-Q1

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1Introduction
  3. 2Latch Response of the 2D Hall Effect
  4. 3Two Axis Sensor Consideration
    1. 3.1 Magnet Selection
      1. 3.1.1 Pole Count
      2. 3.1.2 Magnet Strength
    2. 3.2 Sensor Selection
      1. 3.2.1 Axes of Sensitivity
        1. 3.2.1.1 In-Plane Sensor Alignment
        2. 3.2.1.2 Out-Of Plane Sensor Alignment
      2. 3.2.2 Sensor Placement
        1. 3.2.2.1 On-Axis Magnetic Field
        2. 3.2.2.2 In-Plane Magnetic Field
        3. 3.2.2.3 Out-of-Plane Magnetic Field
      3. 3.2.3 Sensitivity Selection
  5. 4Optimizing for Accuracy
    1. 4.1 Optimizing Placement for Accuracy
    2. 4.2 Optimizing a Magnet for Accuracy
  6. 5Application Implementation
  7. 6Summary
  8. 7References
  9. 8Revision History

On-Axis Magnetic Field

Unlike all of the other scenarios shown in this document, an On-Axis measurement is best suited when using a diametric magnet with only a single pole pair. The sensor should be placed beneath the magnet along the axis of rotation for this type of alignment.

GUID-20210111-CA0I-NZRM-KHVD-KRHMHHL6HX7T-low.gifFigure 3-18 On Axis Alignment

In this position, the magnetic field will always be directed parallel to the magnet face as it rotates, and will therefore produce no z-component.

For this example, we will deviate from the 20-pole bonded ceramic magnet and show the response from a 24.5-mm diameter disc magnet with a thickness of 12.25 mm. The sensor is placed approximately 10 mm below the magnet. Notice that the magnetic flux density for each component has a peak of 75 mT. It would certainly be possible for TMAG5110 or TMAG5111 to operate in this system with a smaller magnet or at a further distance.

What is noteworthy here is that the two components are perfectly 90° out of phase, and share the same peak amplitude. Alignment for this case is fairly simple, with a minimal impact due to amplitude differences.

GUID-20210108-CA0I-S4PR-NDCC-WHBPDDWCVQDT-low.gifFigure 3-19 On-Axis Magnetic Field Components

The drawback for this type of magnet and alignment is resolution. We can only determine each 90° step. To get finer resolution with this type of magnet, the magnet needs to be geared to rotate at a higher ratio than the main body being sensed.

While we would only observe quadrature error to result from sensitivity mismatch, we still expect as much as 1.16° error with the worst case matching. Despite the input having a significantly larger magnitude than in the multi-pole case, the error is still greater than 1° due to the mechanical and electrical phase having a 1:1 ratio. When using a multi-pole magnet the angular resolution improves and will scale the error down.