SNAU265C june   2021  – july 2023 HDC3020 , HDC3020-Q1 , HDC3021 , HDC3021-Q1 , HDC3022 , HDC3022-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1HDC302x Devices
    1. 1.1 HDC3020 in WSON
    2. 1.2 HDC3021 in WSON
    3. 1.3 HDC3022 in WSON
  5. 2Storage and Handling Guidelines
    1. 2.1 Exposure to Contaminants
    2. 2.2 Chemical Analysis
      1. 2.2.1 Saturation and Recovery Tests
      2. 2.2.2 Long-Term Exposure
    3. 2.3 Packaging and Storing
      1. 2.3.1 Assembly
      2. 2.3.2 Application in Extreme Environment
  6. 3Programming the HDC3020
    1. 3.1 Trigger-On Demand
    2. 3.2 Auto Measurement
    3. 3.3 Programming the CRC
      1. 3.3.1 CRC C Code
    4. 3.4 Condensation Removal
    5. 3.5 Offset Error Correction
      1. 3.5.1 Offset Error Correction Example With a Fingerboard
  7. 4References
  8. 5Revision History

Long-Term Exposure

Four samples per chemical were submitted for a long-term exposure test. These devices were exposed to gaseous forms in a sealed chamber for 21 days. Table 2-2 shows the chemicals in this test.

Table 2-2 List of Chemicals for the Long-Term Exposure Test
CHEMICALCONCENTRATION (ppm)OBSERVABLE DAMAGE

Toluene

298 – 322

None

Xylene

108 – 131

None

Butyl Acetate

200 – 220

None

Formaldehyde

3 – 5

None

Sulfur Dioxide

5

None

Ethanol

862 – 1003

None

Methanol

195 – 260

None

Ammonia

34 – 35

None

Cigarette Smoke

Saturated

Staining and coating

For the devices exposed to cigarette smoke, smoke from a cigarette was blown into a chamber until it was saturated and the devices were not visible. Half a cigarette was used each time to saturate the chamber and the smoke inside the chamber was refreshed every day.

For the rest of the chemicals, the chemicals were administered using a syringe. The gases were refreshed every seven days by the chemist to ensure the concentration of the gases remained high.

Overall, most of the chemicals had an increased negative gain, but there were no significant offset changes on these parts. Figure 2-3 and Figure 2-4 show the results for these sweeps.

GUID-20220824-SS0I-ZLL9-KXMN-MWM0SS3LVLTH-low.pngFigure 2-3 Long-Term Exposure Results.
GUID-20220824-SS0I-PP7T-HQBZ-14MZDDVBPQWD-low.pngFigure 2-4 Long-Term Exposure Results.

Figure 2-5 shows that exposure to cigarette smoke resulted in a huge negative gain and the RH error of these parts varied from 25% to –50% between 10% to 90% RH setpoints. The boards also had severe discoloration and visible residue on the sensor opening. The sensor was cleaned using air, but the device performance did not recover.

GUID-20220825-SS0I-VRSB-NHGD-Q1PRD6RL6LFQ-low.pngFigure 2-5 Long-Term Exposure To Cigarettes.