SBOA626 December   2025 OPA187 , OPA192 , OPA202 , OPA320

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
    1. 1.1 Simple Analogy Explaining Instability
    2. 1.2 Circuits With Possible Stability Issues
    3. 1.3 Simple Stability Correction Based on Datasheet Plots
    4. 1.4 Introducing Lab Tools and Measurements
  5. 2Stability Theory for Operational Amplifiers
    1. 2.1 Poles and Zeros
    2. 2.2 Operational Amplifier Model Requirements for Stability Verification
    3. 2.3 Stability Definitions Based on Control Loop Model
    4. 2.4 Graphing Loop-Gain Based on AOL and 1/β
    5. 2.5 Rate of Closure Stability Test
    6. 2.6 Indirect (Non-Invasive) Stability Tests
  6. 3Simulating Open-Loop Stability Tests
    1. 3.1 Breaking the Loop the Wrong Way
    2. 3.2 Breaking the Loop With LC Test Circuit
    3. 3.3 Differential Loop Break Test
  7. 4Stability Correction for Capacitive Load
    1. 4.1 Isolation Resistor (RISO) Method
    2. 4.2 Dual Feedback Method
      1. 4.2.1 RISO-Dual-Feedback With RL
      2. 4.2.2 Dual Feedback With RFX Method
    3. 4.3 Snubber Circuit for Compensating Power Amplifiers and Reference Drive
    4. 4.4 Noise Gain for Stability Compensation
    5. 4.5 Feedback Capacitor (CF) Compensation for Capacitive Load
  8. 5Stability Corrections for Capacitance on the Inverting Node
    1. 5.1 Input Capacitance Instability Due to Zero in 1/β
    2. 5.2 Feedback Capacitor Solves Stability Issue for Capacitance on the Inverting Node
    3. 5.3 Minimum, Balanced, and Maximum Feedback Capacitance
    4. 5.4 Transimpedance Case
  9. 6Complex Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Output Impedance
    1. 6.1 Converting Open-Loop Output Impedance to Closed-Loop Output Impedance
    2. 6.2 Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Model Test
    3. 6.3 Instability Due to Resonance From Complex Output Impedance
    4. 6.4 Impact of Internal Op Amp Topology on Output Impedance Versus Frequency
    5. 6.5 Other Factors Effecting Output Impedance
  10. 7AOL Impact on Stability
    1. 7.1 AOL Secondary Poles and Zeros
    2. 7.2 Modeling the AOL Secondary Poles and Zeros and Input Capacitance
    3. 7.3 Decompensated Op Amps and Stability
    4. 7.4 The Impact of Closed-Loop Gain on Stability
  11. 8Common Problems in Stability Analysis
  12. 9References

Transimpedance Case

The transimpedance amplifier is a common example of a circuit that has stability problems due to capacitance on the inverting node. While the stability concerns with a transimpedance amplifier can be solved using the methods described in previous sections, looking at this configuration separately is worthwhile as the configuration is very common and some additional detail is helpful. The transimpedance amplifier converts a current input to an output voltage. Transimpedance amplifiers are frequently connected to photodiodes because photodiodes output a current proportional to light. A reverse biased photodiode is generally connected directly to the inverting input with respect to ground. Reverse biased photodiodes can have significant capacitance because the cathode and anode act as a parallel plate capacitor with the depletion region acting as the dielectric. Note that the photodiode model contains a current source to emulate the diode output current versus light. The photodiode model also contains the junction capacitance (CJ) and a parasitic leakage resistance RS. The op amp transimpedance gain is set by RF, so often large values of RF are used to amplify the small photodiode currents. The combination of the large feedback resistor with the photodiode capacitance often leads to instability. Figure 5-17 illustrates the transimpedance configuration connected to a photodiode as well as the photodiode equivalent circuit.

OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 Photodiode Model for Transimpedance
          Amplifier Figure 5-17 Photodiode Model for Transimpedance Amplifier

Figure 5-18 shows the uncompensated closed-loop transimpedance amplifier that is used for this example. Figure 5-19 shows the closed-loop AC response for Figure 5-18. Note that the gain shown in this example is the transimpedance gain (VOUT/ID ). The DC transimpedance gain is approximately equal to RF,, or in decibels 20 × log(RF). The large AC peaking and large rapid phase shift is an indication that the circuit is not stable. The reason this circuit is unstable is the large capacitance on the inverting node in conjunction with the large feedback resistor (CJ = 70pF, and RF = 100kΩ).

OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 Unstable Transimpedance (Photodiode)
          Amplifier Figure 5-18 Unstable Transimpedance (Photodiode) Amplifier
OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 Response for Unstable Transimpedance
          (Photodiode) Amplifier Figure 5-19 Response for Unstable Transimpedance (Photodiode) Amplifier

The circuit for testing the open-loop response of the transimpedance amplifier is shown in Figure 5-20, and the open-loop AC response is shown in Figure 5-22. The open-loop response shows that a zero in 1/β causes the rate-of-closure to be 40dB/dec where AOL intersects 1/β. The circuit stability challenges are confirmed by the 1.5° phase margin. As we saw earlier in this section, the correction is to cancel the pole with a zero by adding a feedback capacitor (CF).

OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 Open-Loop Test Circuit for Unstable
          Transimpedance (Photodiode) Amplifier Figure 5-20 Open-Loop Test Circuit for Unstable Transimpedance (Photodiode) Amplifier
OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 AC Open-Loop Response for Unstable
          Transimpedance Amplifier Figure 5-21 AC Open-Loop Response for Unstable Transimpedance Amplifier

Equation 82 can be used to select the minimum value of CF for stability (CF(MIN) = 1.67pF in this example). The location of the zero and pole in 1/β can be found in Equation 83 and Equation 85, respectively. Figure 5-22 graphs the open-loop response with the minimum CF. Notice that the phase margin for the circuit with minimum CF is 51.4°, whereas phase margin was 1.5° without CF.

Equation 82. C F m i n = C J 2 × π × R F × f U G B W = 70 p F 2 π 100 k 40 M H z = 1.67 p F
Equation 83. f Z = R S + R F 2 × π × C J × R S × R F = 150 M Ω + 100 k Ω 2 × π × ( 70 p F ) ( 150 M Ω ) ( 100 k Ω ) = 22.7 k H z
Equation 84. f Z ≅ 1 2 × π × C J × R f = 22.7 k H z ,  for  R S ≫ R F
Equation 85. f P = 1 2 × π × C F × R F = 1 2 × π × 1.67 p F 100 k Ω = 953 k H z
OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 AC Open-Loop Response for Stable
          Transimpedance Amplifier Using Minimum CF Figure 5-22 AC Open-Loop Response for Stable Transimpedance Amplifier Using Minimum CF

Increasing the value of CF beyond the minimum value of CF generally improves the stability further. However, for larger values of CF, the series combination of CF and CJ can potentially create a capacitive load from the output to ground that can cause stability problems. The value of CF also determines the closed-loop transimpedance bandwidth (see Equation 86) as well as the total output noise. Increasing the value of CF reduces the bandwidth and noise. Figure 5-24 shows the closed-loop frequency response for the circuit in Figure 5-23 with different feedback capacitors. You can see that the circuit with no feedback capacitor (0F) has a large 34dB gain peak, and with the minimum (1.7pF) capacitor the gain peak is eliminated and the maximum transimpedance bandwidth is achieved. Using larger feedback capacitors further reduce the bandwidth but can introduce a stability issue at some point due to capacitive loading (CL = CF + CJ).

Equation 86. f B W = 1 2 × π × R F × C F
OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 AC Closed-Loop Transimpedance
          Circuit Figure 5-23 AC Closed-Loop Transimpedance Circuit
OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 AC Closed-Loop Response for Different
          Feedback Capacitor Figure 5-24 AC Closed-Loop Response for Different Feedback Capacitor