SLYY200A April   2021  – December 2023 LM25149 , LM25149-Q1 , LM5156-Q1 , LM5157-Q1 , LM53635-Q1 , LM60440-Q1 , LM61460-Q1 , LM61495-Q1 , LMQ62440-Q1 , LMR33630-Q1 , LMS3655-Q1 , TPS55165-Q1 , UCC12040 , UCC12050

 

  1.   1
  2.   Overview
  3.   At a glance
  4.   What is EMI?
  5.   Conventional methods to reduce EMI in the low- and high-frequency ranges
  6.   Innovations in reducing low-frequency emissions
  7.   Spread spectrum
  8.   Active EMI filtering
  9.   Cancellation windings
  10.   Innovations in reducing high-frequency emissions
  11.   HotRod™ package
  12.   Enhanced HotRod QFN
  13.   Integrated input bypass capacitor
  14.   True slew-rate control
  15.   EMI modeling capabilities
  16.   Low-frequency EMI designs using WEBENCH® design tool
  17.   Conducted and radiated EMI results published in data sheets
  18.   Conclusion
  19.   Keep product categories for low EMI

Cancellation windings

Unlike non-isolated converters, an additional emissions path across the isolation boundary is a key cause of common-mode (CM) EMI in isolated converters. Figure 15 on the following page shows the presence of the parasitic capacitances across the isolation transformer in a standard flyback converter. CM currents can flow directly from primary to earth through the parasitic capacitance associated with each switched node. The CM currents also flow from primary to secondary because of parasitic capacitance between the windings, causing an increase in the measured CM EMI. Conventionally, you could attenuate this additional disturbance by using a large CM choke in the input power path.

GUID-20231208-SS0I-JGFW-KDKL-02R5SFPZDZHD-low.gif Figure 15 CM EMI generating parasitics in a flyback converter.

To help minimize the size of the passive filtering, the 65-W active clamp flyback with silicon FETs reference design for a high-power-density 5- to 20-V AC/DC adapter employs cancellation winding- and shielding-based approaches specific to isolated converters. As shown in Figure 16, an improved internal transformer structure has an extra auxiliary winding layer (shown in black) inserted in between the inner primary and secondary layers for CM balance. The auxiliary CM balance layer shields the inner half-primary to secondary interface and helps generate a canceling CM voltage to null the CM injection from the outer half-primary layer. Equalizing the parasitic capacitances to the secondary layer from the auxiliary winding and primary outer layers helps null the CM current injected into the secondary layer from the outer half-primary layer, by pushing an opposite-phase CM current from the cancellation layer. The net effect — close to zero CM current flowing into the secondary layer — reduces CM emissions, significantly helping the design meet EMI spectral standards with minimal CM filtering.

GUID-20231208-SS0I-4QJT-4FCC-JX09SD4ZP1VW-low.gif Figure 16 Using shielding and cancellation windings to reduce EMI in a flyback converter.