SPRACW9A June   2021  – March 2023 TMS320F2800132 , TMS320F2800132 , TMS320F2800133 , TMS320F2800133 , TMS320F2800135 , TMS320F2800135 , TMS320F2800137 , TMS320F2800137 , TMS320F2800152-Q1 , TMS320F2800152-Q1 , TMS320F2800153-Q1 , TMS320F2800153-Q1 , TMS320F2800154-Q1 , TMS320F2800154-Q1 , TMS320F2800155 , TMS320F2800155 , TMS320F2800155-Q1 , TMS320F2800155-Q1 , TMS320F2800156-Q1 , TMS320F2800156-Q1 , TMS320F2800157 , TMS320F2800157 , TMS320F2800157-Q1 , TMS320F2800157-Q1 , TMS320F280021 , TMS320F280021 , TMS320F280021-Q1 , TMS320F280021-Q1 , TMS320F280023 , TMS320F280023 , TMS320F280023-Q1 , TMS320F280023-Q1 , TMS320F280023C , TMS320F280023C , TMS320F280025 , TMS320F280025 , TMS320F280025-Q1 , TMS320F280025-Q1 , TMS320F280025C , TMS320F280025C , TMS320F280025C-Q1 , TMS320F280025C-Q1 , TMS320F280033 , TMS320F280033 , TMS320F280034 , TMS320F280034 , TMS320F280034-Q1 , TMS320F280034-Q1 , TMS320F280036-Q1 , TMS320F280036-Q1 , TMS320F280036C-Q1 , TMS320F280036C-Q1 , TMS320F280037 , TMS320F280037 , TMS320F280037-Q1 , TMS320F280037-Q1 , TMS320F280037C , TMS320F280037C , TMS320F280037C-Q1 , TMS320F280037C-Q1 , TMS320F280038-Q1 , TMS320F280038-Q1 , TMS320F280038C-Q1 , TMS320F280038C-Q1 , TMS320F280039 , TMS320F280039 , TMS320F280039-Q1 , TMS320F280039-Q1 , TMS320F280039C , TMS320F280039C , TMS320F280039C-Q1 , TMS320F280039C-Q1 , TMS320F280040-Q1 , TMS320F280040-Q1 , TMS320F280040C-Q1 , TMS320F280040C-Q1 , TMS320F280041 , TMS320F280041 , TMS320F280041-Q1 , TMS320F280041-Q1 , TMS320F280041C , TMS320F280041C , TMS320F280041C-Q1 , TMS320F280041C-Q1 , TMS320F280045 , TMS320F280045 , TMS320F280048-Q1 , TMS320F280048-Q1 , TMS320F280048C-Q1 , TMS320F280048C-Q1 , TMS320F280049 , TMS320F280049 , TMS320F280049-Q1 , TMS320F280049-Q1 , TMS320F280049C , TMS320F280049C , TMS320F280049C-Q1 , TMS320F280049C-Q1 , TMS320F28075 , TMS320F28075 , TMS320F28075-Q1 , TMS320F28075-Q1 , TMS320F28076 , TMS320F28076 , TMS320F28374D , TMS320F28374D , TMS320F28374S , TMS320F28374S , TMS320F28375D , TMS320F28375D , TMS320F28375S , TMS320F28375S , TMS320F28375S-Q1 , TMS320F28375S-Q1 , TMS320F28376D , TMS320F28376D , TMS320F28376S , TMS320F28376S , TMS320F28377D , TMS320F28377D , TMS320F28377D-EP , TMS320F28377D-EP , TMS320F28377D-Q1 , TMS320F28377D-Q1 , TMS320F28377S , TMS320F28377S , TMS320F28377S-Q1 , TMS320F28377S-Q1 , TMS320F28378D , TMS320F28378D , TMS320F28378S , TMS320F28378S , TMS320F28379D , TMS320F28379D , TMS320F28379D-Q1 , TMS320F28379D-Q1 , TMS320F28379S , TMS320F28379S , TMS320F28384D , TMS320F28384D , TMS320F28384D-Q1 , TMS320F28384D-Q1 , TMS320F28384S , TMS320F28384S , TMS320F28384S-Q1 , TMS320F28384S-Q1 , TMS320F28386D , TMS320F28386D , TMS320F28386D-Q1 , TMS320F28386D-Q1 , TMS320F28386S , TMS320F28386S , TMS320F28386S-Q1 , TMS320F28386S-Q1 , TMS320F28388D , TMS320F28388D , TMS320F28388S , TMS320F28388S , TMS320F28P650DH , TMS320F28P650DH , TMS320F28P650DK , TMS320F28P650DK , TMS320F28P650SH , TMS320F28P650SH , TMS320F28P650SK , TMS320F28P650SK , TMS320F28P659DH-Q1 , TMS320F28P659DH-Q1 , TMS320F28P659DK-Q1 , TMS320F28P659DK-Q1 , TMS320F28P659SH-Q1 , TMS320F28P659SH-Q1

 

  1.   Abstract
  2.   Trademarks
  3. 1Introduction
    1. 1.1 Memory Cross-Talk Challenges
    2. 1.2 Resources for Signal Conditioning Circuit Design
      1. 1.2.1 TI Precision Labs - SAR ADC Input Driver Design Series
      2. 1.2.2 Analog Engineer's Calculator
      3. 1.2.3 Related Application Reports
      4. 1.2.4 TINA-TI SPICE-Based Analog Simulation Program
      5. 1.2.5 PSPICE for TI
      6. 1.2.6 ADC Input Circuit Evaluation for C2000 MCUs
      7. 1.2.7 Charge-Sharing Driving Circuits for C2000 ADCs
  4. 2Review of ADC Input Settling
    1. 2.1 Mechanism of ADC Input Settling
    2. 2.2 Symptoms of Inadequate Settling
      1. 2.2.1 Distortion
      2. 2.2.2 Memory Cross-Talk
      3. 2.2.3 Accuracy
    3. 2.3 C2000 ADC Architecture
  5. 3Problem Statement
    1. 3.1 Example System
    2. 3.2 S+H Settling Analysis
    3. 3.3 Charge-Sharing Analysis
    4. 3.4 Problem Summary
  6. 4Dedicated ADC Sampling
    1. 4.1 Dedicated ADC Concept
    2. 4.2 Settling Mechanism for Dedicated ADC
    3. 4.3 Design Flow for Dedicated ADC
    4. 4.4 Simulating Settling Performance for a Dedicated ADC Circuit
  7. 5Pre-Sampling VREFLO
    1. 5.1 VREFLO Sampling Concept
    2. 5.2 Properties of VREFLO Sampling Method Error
    3. 5.3 Gain Error Compensation
      1. 5.3.1 Methods for Determining Compensation Coefficients
    4. 5.4 VREFLO Sampling Design Flow
    5. 5.5 Discussion of VREFLO Sampling Sequences
  8. 6Summary
  9. 7References
  10. 8Revision History

Simulating Settling Performance for a Dedicated ADC Circuit

In Section 4.2, a simple simulation was presented for the response of a dedicated ADC design to a single input step. However, simulation can also be used to evaluate the settling performance using an AC source. This allows for investigation of how the settling performance changes with increasing input frequency.

Before proceeding, it may be useful to first review the methods for performing an AC Input Simulation presented in the TI Precision Labs video: Final SAR ADC Drive Simulations.

Figure 4-4 shows the simulation setup for the AC simulation. The 400 V DC input source has been replaced with a 400 Vpp sine input. On the top, a duplicate of the original circuit, minus the sampling, has been added. This is necessary to generate a reference waveform that the sampled voltage can be compared to. If the input source is used directly for comparison the phase delay from the various R-C components will obscure the settling error.

GUID-EBD96A5E-6DBA-42FD-8A6B-C70E5A82190B-low.png Figure 4-4 Schematic for AC Simulation for Dedicated ADC

Figure 4-5 shows the results of simulating a 60Hz AC input over many samples over 1 ms. Selecting an arbitrary sample while the sine wave is rising and examining the error waveform shows a settling error of about 0.2 mV right at the end of the S+H window. This level of settling error indicates the circuit is achieving good settling performance with a 60Hz input (1/2 LSB with a 3.0 V range is 0.37 mV).

GUID-B5868202-3A3F-46B9-83B1-AC58CE706EAD-low.png Figure 4-5 Settling Simulation for 60Hz AC Input

Compared to the 60Hz input, Figure 4-6 shows the results of instead simulating with a 6kHz input. Taking the error at the end of the S+H period while the waveform is decreasing shows a settling error of approximately 19 mV, so the circuit does not perform very well when trying to track a much faster input. Note, however, that increasing the external ADC pin capacitor, CS, improves the settling performance at higher speeds. Care needs to be taken to ensure CS is not made so large that the 6 kHz input is attenuated by the low-pass filter formed by CS and RS.

GUID-C7D49B43-BD96-4FCC-9A01-133F127D6EAB-low.png Figure 4-6 Settling Simulation for 6kHz AC Input

In addition to the settling error increasing with increasing ADC input frequency, another important property of the settling error to note is that faster moving portions of the input signal will have increased error when compared to slower moving portions of the signal. Because of this, the settling error will not equally affect all portions of the input sine wave, resulting in the sampled waveform being distorted.