SBAA463A january   2021  – april 2023 TMAG5170 , TMAG5170-Q1 , TMAG5170D-Q1 , TMAG5173-Q1 , TMAG5273

 

  1.   Abstract
  2.   Trademarks
  3. 1Introduction
    1. 1.1 Angle Measurement With One-Dimensional Sensors
    2. 1.2 Challenges of Angular Measurements
  4. 2Benefit of Multi-Axis Sensors
    1. 2.1 Simplified Mechanical Placement
    2. 2.2 Sensitivity Matching
    3. 2.3 CORDIC Angle Estimations
    4. 2.4 Tamper and Stray Field Detection
  5. 3Angular Measurement Considerations
    1. 3.1 Sensor Alignment
    2. 3.2 Sensor Calibration
    3. 3.3 Input Referred Noise
    4. 3.4 Impact of Sample Rate
  6. 4Practical Application
    1. 4.1 Push-Button Knob
      1. 4.1.1 Evaluating Design Constraints
      2. 4.1.2 Magnet Selection
      3. 4.1.3 Prototyping and Verification
    2. 4.2 Off-Axis Design
      1. 4.2.1 Sensitivity Gain Correction
      2. 4.2.2 Accuracy Verification
  7. 5Summary
  8. 6References
  9. 7Revision History

Magnet Selection

As previously mentioned, the magnet for the design needed to be 1/2 inch in diameter while providing enough magnetic flux density to operate near full scale input of the ±100 mT input range. It is best to leave headroom in the design to allow for variations, so a rough target of about 90% was chosen to guide magnet selection.

Even within this restriction, there is still a fair amount of flexibility regarding magnet thickness, magnet material, and the air gap between the magnet and sensor. For this diameter magnet, 1/8 in is a common available thickness that is available in multiple material types and is easily handled during assembly.

With a magnet geometry selected, simulations of magnetic flux density for various materials and air gaps were run to determine the remaining variables.

GUID-20201229-CA0I-FVFM-HVT5-7HNSLB7QRMTB-low.gifFigure 4-2 Push-Button Knob Proximity Simulation

Based on these results, the N42 material was selected to use at an distance of 3 mm from the sensor.