SBOA602 November   2024 OPA593

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
  5. 2Current Booster, Push-Pull Topology Output Characteristics
    1. 2.1 Open-Loop Output Impedance
    2. 2.2 Minimizing Zero Crossover Distortion
  6. 3Various Current Booster Configurations
    1. 3.1 Complementary MOSFET versus BJT Current Booster Comparisons
  7. 4Stabilizing a Design for Power Amplifier Driving 1μF Capacitive Load (CL)
    1. 4.1 Op-Amp Driving Resistive Load
    2. 4.2 Op-Amp Driving Capacitive Load and Challenges
    3. 4.3 Open-Loop AC Stability Analysis - Compensating CL Effects Using DFC
    4. 4.4 Closed-Loop Stability Response - Small Signal Step Transient Analysis
    5. 4.5 Effects of Riso on Frequency Response in Dual Feedback Compensation
    6. 4.6 Summary of the DFC Technique
  8. 5Stabilizing the OPA593 and Darlington Current Booster for 1μF Capacitive Load
    1. 5.1 Open-Loop AC Stability Analysis - Composite Op-Amp Driving 1μF CL
    2. 5.2 Closed-Loop Stability Response - Composite Op-Amp's Step Transient Analysis
  9. 6Composite Amplifier's Effective BW and Step Time Response
  10. 7Test Bench Validation
  11. 8Summary
  12. 9References

Effects of Riso on Frequency Response in Dual Feedback Compensation

The DFC technique for compensating capacitive loads is complex. One challenge in optimizing DFC is that the effective bandwidth often exhibits gain peaking or Q effects in the AC frequency response. Gain peaking or a high Q factor indicates that more than one pole is present within the UGBW, a phenomenon characteristic of the DFC method, as illustrated in Figure 4-8. Gain peaking occurs when poles are closely spaced or overlapped within the closed feedback loop, resulting in resonant responses that elevate gains. This effect is observable only when the feedback loop is closed, whether in the time or frequency domain.

In the op-amp compensated for 1µF capacitive load, as depicted in Figure 4-8, the resistance Riso values are progressively increased from 100mΩ, 500mΩ, 1Ω, and 5Ω. The selection of Riso​ is relative to the op-amp’s open-loop output impedance, defined at 1Ω across all frequencies in the emulated Spice model. As Riso increases, the additional pole fp2 shifts toward lower frequencies, as described by Equation 4. This pole shift contributes to gain peaking in the frequency response when the newly emerged pole moves closer to the dominant pole, fDFC_BW​ defined in the DFC loop. Gain peaking occurs when these two poles overlap or come too close together, as shown in Figure 4-8.

To optimize the value of Riso in the DFC technique and eliminate guesswork, Equation 3 is used to calculate Riso, based on the following Determine Optimal Isolation Resistance for Driving Capacitive Load, application note. The Riso value must be significantly lower than both Zo and RF​ parameters. A larger Riso value can adversely affect the gain peaking or quality factor (Q) of the compensation loop, potentially altering the circuit's stability and effective bandwidth.

 Effect of Riso of the Compensated Op-Amp Driving 1μF Capacitive LoadFigure 4-8 Effect of Riso of the Compensated Op-Amp Driving 1μF Capacitive Load