SBOA602 November   2024 OPA593

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
  5. 2Current Booster, Push-Pull Topology Output Characteristics
    1. 2.1 Open-Loop Output Impedance
    2. 2.2 Minimizing Zero Crossover Distortion
  6. 3Various Current Booster Configurations
    1. 3.1 Complementary MOSFET versus BJT Current Booster Comparisons
  7. 4Stabilizing a Design for Power Amplifier Driving 1μF Capacitive Load (CL)
    1. 4.1 Op-Amp Driving Resistive Load
    2. 4.2 Op-Amp Driving Capacitive Load and Challenges
    3. 4.3 Open-Loop AC Stability Analysis - Compensating CL Effects Using DFC
    4. 4.4 Closed-Loop Stability Response - Small Signal Step Transient Analysis
    5. 4.5 Effects of Riso on Frequency Response in Dual Feedback Compensation
    6. 4.6 Summary of the DFC Technique
  8. 5Stabilizing the OPA593 and Darlington Current Booster for 1μF Capacitive Load
    1. 5.1 Open-Loop AC Stability Analysis - Composite Op-Amp Driving 1μF CL
    2. 5.2 Closed-Loop Stability Response - Composite Op-Amp's Step Transient Analysis
  9. 6Composite Amplifier's Effective BW and Step Time Response
  10. 7Test Bench Validation
  11. 8Summary
  12. 9References

Open-Loop AC Stability Analysis - Compensating CL Effects Using DFC

How to adequately compensate capacitive loads in op-amps is well documented in the Precision Lab Series: Op Amps. This video series provides an overview of theories, simulations, examples and application notes.

One technique covered is the Dual Feedback Compensation (DFC) method, commonly used to compensate for complex loads in op-amps. However, detailed information on this technique is limited, particularly concerning current booster configurations like the OPA593 combined with a current booster driver.

The DFC technique mitigates the effects of capacitive loads, as demonstrated in Figure 4-2. This method involves placing an isolation resistor in series with the op-amp’s output or within the feedback path. The combination of the op-amp’s output impedance (Zo + Riso​) with the capacitive load (​CL) introduces an additional pole (fp2​), derived from Equation 4.

To estimate Riso​, use the provided equation and select the nearest standard resistor value. In this example, the gain bandwidth product is defined at 10MHz, with a gain of 8V/V. The op-amp's closed-loop dominant pole (fdom, 10MHz/8) is calculated to be 1.25MHz. The emulated op-amp’s open-loop output impedance, Zo, is modeled at 1Ω across all frequencies, and Riso is determined to be 356.8mΩ, approximately 357mΩ, as calculated from Equation 3.

Equation 3. Riso  Zo2πCLfdom        (if CL>10nF)

The open-loop AC loop analysis focuses on determining the UGBW, loop gain, phase margins and other small signal stability parameters, as shown in Figure 4-2. Next, the compensated op-amp configuration is simulated to verify the circuit's closed-loop stability. This verification is achieved by applying a small step transient signal at the op-amp input during closed-loop operation. Making sure of the stability of an op-amp driving a complex load requires at least two simulation steps. The loop-stability iteration process optimizes the compensation between open-loop AC characteristics and closed-loop feedback responses. Without the proper step sequence, the op-amp's closed-loop behavior is undetermined, and output oscillatory behavior can manifest, as the uncompensated op-amp demonstrated in Figure 4-3.

 Open-Loop AC Analysis of an Uncompensated Op-amp With RisoFigure 4-2 Open-Loop AC Analysis of an Uncompensated Op-amp With Riso
Equation 4. fp2= 12πZo+RisoRLCL12πZoRLCL     (if Riso  Zo)

When an op-amp feedback system drives a capacitive load, understanding the interaction between the open-loop output impedance and the load capacitance is crucial. The emulated power amplifier’s open-loop output impedance, Zo, is defined at 1Ω across all frequencies.

When driving 1μF capacitive load, a newly generated pole is calculated to be approximately 118kHz, as presented in Equation 4. Without the capacitive load, the unity gain bandwidth, funity, was simulated at 1.25MHz with a phase margin of 88.6°, as shown in Figure 4-1. Introducing the capacitive load causes funity to decrease, reducing the op-amp's roll-off slope from -20dB/decade to -40dB/decade, and the UGBW from 1.25MHz to approximately 374kHz. This additional pole reduces the phase margin from 88.6° to 17.4°, limiting the overall bandwidth of the system.

 Uncompensated Op-Amp Driving 1μF Load - UnstableFigure 4-3 Uncompensated Op-Amp Driving 1μF Load - Unstable

To stabilize the feedback loop in Figure 4-2, set the additional fp2 pole frequency approximately 1 to 2 octaves lower than the simulated 374kHz. With the effective bandwidth defined at 50kHz in Table 4-2, we assign this value to fDFC_BW and calculate CF using Equation 5, estimating the result to be approximately 455pF. A standard capacitor value of 420pF is selected, as shown in Figure 4-4.

 Outer Feedback Loop Compensation Bode Plot Driving (Zo + Riso )∥RL and CLFigure 4-4 Outer Feedback Loop Compensation Bode Plot Driving (Zo + Riso )∥RL and CL

The effective bandwidth of the DFC technique refers to the frequency range in which the op-amp achieves the desired gains and performance. In a dual feedback compensation topology, the op-amp bandwidth is not determined by the gain bandwidth product (GBP); instead, the effective bandwidth is primarily influenced by external compensation components, such as Riso, RF and CF, as illustrated in Figure 4-5 and described in Equation 5. The compensation of the outer pole in the feedback loop, represented as approximately 1/sRFCF, defines the effective bandwidth (fDFC_BW) of the DFC configuration.

Equation 5. fDFC_BW= 12πRF + RisoCF12πRF×CF (if RisoRF)
 DFC Overall Open-Loop AC Analysis: 2.6MHz UGBW and Phase Margin 89°Figure 4-5 DFC Overall Open-Loop AC Analysis: 2.6MHz UGBW and Phase Margin 89°