SPRACN9E september   2022  – may 2023 AM67 , AM67A , AM68 , AM68A , AM69 , AM69A , DRA829J , DRA829J-Q1 , DRA829V , DRA829V-Q1 , TDA4AEN-Q1 , TDA4VEN-Q1 , TDA4VM , TDA4VM-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Jacinto 7 LPDDR4 Board Design and Layout Guidelines
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Overview
    1. 1.1 Board Designs Supported
    2. 1.2 General Board Layout Guidelines
    3. 1.3 PCB Stack-Up
    4. 1.4 Bypass Capacitors
      1. 1.4.1 Bulk Bypass Capacitors
      2. 1.4.2 High-Speed Bypass Capacitors
    5. 1.5 Velocity Compensation
  5. 2LPDDR4 Board Design and Layout Guidance
    1. 2.1  LPDDR4 Introduction
    2. 2.2  LPDDR4 Device Implementations Supported
    3. 2.3  LPDDR4 Interface Schematics
    4. 2.4  Compatible JEDEC LPDDR4 Devices
    5. 2.5  Placement
    6. 2.6  LPDDR4 Keepout Region
    7. 2.7  Net Classes
    8. 2.8  LPDDR4 Signal Termination
    9. 2.9  LPDDR4 VREF Routing
    10. 2.10 LPDDR4 VTT
    11. 2.11 CK and ADDR_CTRL Topologies
    12. 2.12 Data Group Topologies
    13. 2.13 CK and ADDR_CTRL Routing Specification
    14. 2.14 Data Group Routing Specification
    15. 2.15 Channel, Byte, and Bit Swapping
  6. 3LPDDR4 Board Design Simulations
    1. 3.1 Board Model Extraction
    2. 3.2 Board-Model Validation
    3. 3.3 S-Parameter Inspection
    4. 3.4 Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) Analysis
    5. 3.5 Simulation Integrity Analysis
      1. 3.5.1 Simulation Setup
      2. 3.5.2 Simulation Parameters
      3. 3.5.3 Simulation Targets
        1. 3.5.3.1 Waveform Quality
        2. 3.5.3.2 Eye Quality
        3. 3.5.3.3 Delay Report
        4. 3.5.3.4 Mask Report
    6. 3.6 Design Example
      1. 3.6.1 Stack-Up
      2. 3.6.2 Routing
      3. 3.6.3 Model Verification
      4. 3.6.4 Simulation Results
  7. 4Revision History

1.1 Board Designs Supported

In order to achieve the high frequency targets of the LPDDR4 interfaces, an optimal PCB implementation is required. TI highly recommends that customer designs copy the TI LPDDR4 EVM PCB layout exactly, and in every detail (PCB material, routing, spacing, vias w/ back-drill, and so forth) in order to achieve the full specified interface frequency/data rate. If the design does not or cannot copy the TI solution, TI's EVM should still be used as a starting point/reference. Based on any compromises made, the customer design may need to constrain the interface frequency/data rate.

The goal of this document is to define a set of layout, routing, and simulation rules that allow designers to successfully implement a robust design for the topologies that TI supports. It is also required that the PCB design be simulated to ensure the design targets are achieved. TI will limit debug/support for boards that have not been designed and simulated according to the steps defined in this document. Systems that do not follow the TI EVM implementation and/or do not have valid simulation results will likely need to run at a reduced DDR frequency.

This document provides Reference eye masks as guidance for validation of the simulations results. It is still expected that the PCB design work (design, layout, and fabrication) is performed and reviewed by a highly knowledgeable high-speed PCB designer. Problems such as impedance discontinuities when signals cross a split in a reference plane can be detected visually by those with the proper experience.

TI only supports board designs that follow the guidelines in this document. These guidelines are based on well-known transmission line properties for copper traces routed over a solid reference plane. Declaring insufficient PCB space does not allow routing guidelines to be discounted. TI will limit debug/support for designs that have not been simulated according to the steps defined in this document.