SBOK102 July   2025 INA1H94-SP

 

  1.   1
  2.   2
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Overview
  5. 2SEE Mechanisms
  6. 3Irradiation Facilities and Telemetry
  7. 4Test Device and Test Board Information
    1. 4.1 Qualification Circuits and Boards
    2. 4.2 Characterization Devices and Test Board Schematics
  8. 5Results
    1. 5.1 SEL Qualification Results
    2. 5.2 SET Characterization Results: MSU FRIB Linac
    3. 5.3 Analysis
    4. 5.4 Weibull Fit
  9. 6Summary
  10.   A MSU Results Appendix
  11.   B Confidence Interval Calculations
  12.   C References

Irradiation Facilities and Telemetry

For SEL qualification and SET characterization testing, heavy ion species were provided and delivered by the MSU Facility for Rare Isotope Beams(4) (FRIB) using a linear particle accelerator ion source. Ion beams were delivered with high uniformity over a 17mm × 18mm area for the in-air station. A current-based measurement is performed on the collimating slits, which intercept 90-95% of the total beam, and this measurement is cross-calibrated against Faraday cup readings. These measurements are real-time continuous and establish dosimetry and integrated fluence. In-vacuum and in-air scintillating viewers are used for measurement of the beam size and distribution. An ion flux of 105 ions / s-cm2 was used to provide heavy ion fluences to 107 ions / cm2 for most runs. Ion flux was reduced to 104 ions / s-cm2 for some runs, to show SEL immunity at multiple flux rates and to explore the effect of flux rate on transient event counts.

For SET testing, the FRIB "degrader wheel" was employed to adjust the ion energy. The wheel is positioned between the beam "window" or output, and the device under test. The wheel features multiple slots where a foil degrading element of known thicknesses can be loaded. When the wheel is rotated to an "open" slot, only the 70mm air gap and the copper foil in the LINAC path serve to degrade the ion energy. When the wheel is remotely rotated to a slot with a given aluminum degrading foil thickness, the ions pass through the aluminum foil as well, and are slowed accordingly. This decreases the effective ion range in silicon, but increases the effective Linear Energy Transfer (LETeff) in MeV-cm2/mg, effectively shifting along the Bragg curve. Use of the degrader wheel allows multiple LETeff values to be achieved per beam species and LINAC energy level, reducing the switching time and improving testing throughput.

Table 3-1 Effective Surface LET for Various Beam Species and Degrader Thicknesses
Beam species LINAC energy (MEV/u) Nominal Cu foil width (µm) Airgap (mm) Al degrader thickness (µm) LETeff at DUT (MeV-cm2/mg) Range in Si at DUT (µm) Notes
169Tm 20.3 5 70 0 75.0 90 No degrader foil used
129Xe 25 5 70 50.8 60.4 86 Comparable to 20MeV/u Xe beam
129Xe 25 5 70 0 50.5 144 No degrader foil used
86Kr 25 5 70 127 35.7 71 Comparable to 17MeV/u Kr beam
86Kr 25 5 70 76.2 29.0 128 Comparable to 20MeV/u Kr beam
86Kr 25 5 70 0 23.1 217 No degrader foil used
40Ar 30 10 70 381 10.8 101 Comparable to 15MeV/u Ar beam
40Ar 30 10 70 279.4 7.83 216 Comparable to 20MeV/u Ar beam
40Ar 30 10 70 152.4 6.23 361 Comparable to 25MeV/u Ar beam
40Ar 30 10 70 0 5.25 534 No degrader foil used
16O 20 10 70 0 1.49 471 No degrader foil used