STDA039 July   2026 F28377D-SEP , INA901-SP , SN54SLC8T245-SEP , TPS7A4501-SP , TPS7H1121-SEP , TPS7H1121-SP , TPS7H5020-SEP , TPS7H5020-SP , TPS7H6101-SEP

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3. 1Introduction
  4. 2Space ‑ Electronics Design Landscape
  5. 3Importance of a Single Controlled Baseline
  6. 4The Steps to Take to Upscreen a COTS Device
    1. 4.1 Step 1 – Identifying the Candidates
    2. 4.2 Step 2 – Preparation for Single‑Event Effect (SEE) Testing (Opening)
    3. 4.3 Step 3 – Single‑Event Effect (SEE) Testing
    4. 4.4 Step 4 – Running TID Tests and Evaluating Radiation Lifetime
  7. 5Lead‑Time and Yield Responsibility
  8. 6Summary
  9. 7References

Abstract

This white paper compares COTS up-screening versus space-qualified component sourcing across mission types—LEO constellations, MEO and GEO platforms, deep space, and legacy programs—examining the potential technical, cost, schedule, and risk tradeoffs to provide readers with a practical decision framework for improving component sourcing strategies.