TIDUF63 December 2023
Micro inverters require isolation between PV panels and the AC grid because of a variety of reasons such as the following:
From a safety point of view, PV panels can be touched by the end-user, thus isolation can mitigate the electrical shock hazard. The common-mode currents are a well-known challenge in PV applications due to PV surfaces exposed over grounded roofs or other surfaces in the proximity. This enormous quantity of surface leads to high parasitic capacitance between the panels and the ground (200 nF / kW). This parasitic capacitance can cause high common-mode current flowing into the system when common mode voltage of the converters is not mitigated enough. A common strategy to significantly reduce the parasitic currents flowing in the system is to add an isolation stage between the panels and the grid.
The third reason to use an isolated transformer is to efficiently convert power from 75 V to 400 V.
When converting from 75 V to 400 V, using non-isolated DC/DC, challenges like very short duty cycle and high losses in inductor and switches are found. To improve efficiency and thermal performance of the conversion stage, a transformer CLLLC was used.
The input and output voltage for the CLLLC converter is fixed and regulated by PV or battery inputs and DC/AC converter, respectively. This means that no voltage regulation is needed in this stage.
To address all these requirements, CLLLC topology with fixed-frequency was selected, thus leading to small magnetic size and high efficiency. This converter can be optimized to operate in the most favorable point and achieve Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) in the entire load range.
To increase efficiency and provide bidirectional power flow, this design uses CLLLC topology with Synchronous Rectification (SR). When power flows from the LV to the HV, SR is implemented on the HV side. In reverse power flow, the excitation is on HV side and SR on the LV side.
Driving the transformer in a CLLLC converter can be achieved with two possible configurations: full-bridge and half-bridge configurations. The full-bridge requires twice the amount of switches with respect to the half-bridge configuration. Conversely, half-bridge has 2 times more current with the same power level.
On the LV side current is higher, thus making the full-bridge converter the best option. The HV side has much higher voltage and lower current levels, thus making a half-bridge converter the optimum design.