TIDUFD2 May 2025
As the trajectories show, in Section 3.3.3, ZVS realization is different in different loads, voltages, and modes. At light load in mode III, the controller has wide room between primary and secondary ZVS requirements, this means that there is a lot of current circulating in the system. By changing the frequency, the distance between the primary and secondary ZVS requirements can be narrowed and reduce the circulating current.
In grid sine waves with high peaks, a low load causes a lack of primary side ZVS. The load coefficient M is defined as the ratio of IREF to IN. IN is dependent on LK and the switching frequency. The controller can increase switching frequency at light loads to increase relative load M by decreasing IN.
The best switching frequency is defined by the frequency that achieves the desired distance Δ between primary and secondary ZVS requirements. This Δ is selected by the system designer following a thorough characterization of the system.
Derive the equations for the best switching frequency from Equation 4 and Equation 6. Equation 10 and Equation 11 are the final equations.
An increase of FSW is because of an increase in the relative load M of the converter. The increased load in mode III of operation reduced the distance between the primary and secondary ZVS requirements but at the same time reduced the RMS current. In mode II the increase of FSW helps to have the minimum load required by the primary lagging arm to keep the current positive at the positive voltage pulse, thus achieving ZVS.
The trajectories clearly show that with heavy loads, the calculated switching frequency is low, limited by the FSW_MIN requirement. Conversely, when working under light loads, the frequency rises to maximum (FSW_MAX) saturation mark. With moderate loads, however, the frequency exhibits significant variability and achieves ZVS over a broad range while maintaining circulation current at a low level.