TIDA029A july   2019  – june 2023 CC2640R2F-Q1 , CC2642R , CC2642R-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Bluetooth Angle of Arrival (AoA) Antenna Design
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
  5. 2Angle of Arrival Antenna Design Considerations
    1. 2.1 Antenna Spacing
    2. 2.2 RF Switch Considerations
  6. 3Dipole Antenna Array
    1. 3.1 Dipole Antenna Strengths and Weaknesses
    2. 3.2 Angle Measurement Plane
    3. 3.3 PCB Implementation
    4. 3.4 Two Dipole Array Test Results
      1. 3.4.1 Total Radiated Power (TRP)
      2. 3.4.2 Measuring Antenna 1 and 2 Phase Difference
        1. 3.4.2.1 Bare PCB
        2. 3.4.2.2 PCB + RF Absorbing Material
        3. 3.4.2.3 PCB + RF Absorbing Material + Tin-Plated Copper Foil
        4. 3.4.2.4 PCB + RF Absorbing Material + Tin-Plated Copper Foil + Metal
      3. 3.4.3 Phase Difference vs Distance
  7. 4Calculating AoA From IQ Measurements
    1. 4.1 Dipole Antenna Array Uncompensated Angle of Arrival Results
      1. 4.1.1 Bare PCB Uncompensated AoA
      2. 4.1.2 PCB + RF Absorbing Material Uncompensated AoA
      3. 4.1.3 PCB + RF Absorbing Material + Tin-Plated Copper Foil Uncompensated AoA
      4. 4.1.4 PCB + RF Absorbing Material + Tin-Plated Copper Foil + Metal Uncompensated AoA
    2. 4.2 Dipole Antenna Array Compensated AoA Results
      1. 4.2.1 Bare PCB AoA With Compensation
      2. 4.2.2 PCB + RF Absorbing Material + Tin-Plated Copper Foil Compensated AoA
      3. 4.2.3 PCB + RF Absorbing Material + Tin-Plated Copper Foil + Metal Compensated AoA
      4. 4.2.4 Hardware Setup Compensated Results Comparison
  8. 5References
  9. 6Revision History

Antenna Spacing

The two receiving antenna phase centers must be within ½ λ (maximum phase difference of 180°) to easily determine which antenna is closer to the transmitter. In a two-antenna system, each antenna takes turns measuring phase. Once phase measurements are completed, the phase difference between the antennas is used to calculate the AoA. If the difference is greater than 180°, the true phase difference could be incorrectly interpreted. Figure 2-1 shows an example of a Bluetooth Low Energy transmitting node 180° from an antenna array with ¾ λ distance between antenna phase centers.

GUID-60662157-1049-44D1-8ADB-302946F549C7-low.gif Figure 2-1 Antenna Array With ¾ λ Spacing

Antenna 1 measures 0° and antenna 2 measures 270° (–90°), the phase difference should be calculated as 270°. However, the phase difference could be interpreted incorrectly as a 90° difference from 270° to 0° as the phase diagram in Figure 2-2 shows.

GUID-6EF57973-0E0B-4B83-941E-0D65845E1162-low.gif Figure 2-2 Example Phasor Diagram of ¾ λ Antenna Spacing

By ensuring the antennas are at max ½ λ, the phase difference range always falls from 0° to 180° (or –180°) and there is no issue determining which antenna is closer to the transmitting node because the lowest phase difference is always correct whether positive or negative as Figure 2-3 shows.

GUID-D05667F3-90FB-4ABB-AC95-61FF3B5AD181-low.gif Figure 2-3 Phasor Diagram with ≤ ½ λ Antenna Spacing

If the antenna array is designed at the center of the Bluetooth spectrum (2.44 GHz), the antenna spacing must be less than or equal to 61.5 mm. Therefore, antenna coupling can become an issue affecting the antenna arrays efficiency.