SPRACP3D November   2019  – August 2026 AWR6843 , AWR6843AOP , IWR1443 , IWR1642 , IWR6443 , IWR6843 , IWR6843AOP

 

  1.   1
  2.   Trademarks
  3. 1Introduction
  4. 2Typical Certification Procedure
  5. 3Regulatory Compliance Overview
    1. 3.1 European Union Regulations: Radio Equipment Directive (RED)
      1. 3.1.1 Short Range Radar (EN 305 550)
      2. 3.1.2 Short Range Level Probing Radar (EN 302 729)
        1. 3.1.2.1 Permitted Frequency Ranges and Operating Bandwidth
        2. 3.1.2.2 Antenna Requirements
      3. 3.1.3 RF Exposure Limit - EN 62311
      4. 3.1.4 Electrical Safety - EN 62368
      5. 3.1.5 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - EN 301 489
    2. 3.2 Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
      1. 3.2.1 End Equipment and FCC Clause
      2. 3.2.2 60GHz Radar Operation (47 CFR § 15.255)
        1. 3.2.2.1 Fundamental Emission Levels, BWs, and Max Duty Cycle
        2. 3.2.2.2 Spurious Emissions
        3. 3.2.2.3 Frequency Stability
        4. 3.2.2.4 FCC Waiver and Other Relevant Information
      3. 3.2.3 Level Probing Radar (47 CFR § 15.256)
        1. 3.2.3.1 Usage Limitations
        2. 3.2.3.2 Fundamental Emissions, BWs
        3. 3.2.3.3 Antenna Restrictions
        4. 3.2.3.4 Unwanted Emissions
      4. 3.2.4 Modular Approval (47 CFR § 15.212)
      5. 3.2.5 Radiation Exposure Requirement
    3. 3.3 Japan Radio Law
      1. 3.3.1 BW, Designated Frequency, and Tolerances
      2. 3.3.2 Out of Band and Spurious Emissions
      3. 3.3.3 Controller Functions
    4. 3.4 Wireless Planning and Coordination Wing (WPC)
      1. 3.4.1 Permitted Frequency of Operations and Approval
      2. 3.4.2 Equipment Type Authorization
    5. 3.5 Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT)
      1. 3.5.1 Fundamental Emission Levels and BWs
    6. 3.6 National Telecommunications Agency (ANATEL)
      1. 3.6.1 Fundamental Emissions Levels, BWs, and Max Duty Cycle
      2. 3.6.2 Licenses
    7. 3.7 Ministry of Transport and Communications (MTC)
    8. 3.8 National Communications Entity (ENACOM)
  6. 4Applicable Terms and Equations
    1. 4.1 Duty Cycle Factor
    2. 4.2 Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP)
    3. 4.3 Friis Equation
    4. 4.4 Far-Field Boundary
  7. 5Tools and Setup
    1. 5.1 Hardware Setup
    2. 5.2 Internal Laboratory Test Setup
      1. 5.2.1 Near-Field Circuit Probing
      2. 5.2.2 Occupied Bandwidth Testing
      3. 5.2.3 Radiation Pattern Measurement
    3. 5.3 MMWAVESTUDIO
      1. 5.3.1 Running LUA Scripts
    4. 5.4 mmWave Visualizer
    5. 5.5 IWR6843ISK-ODS Test Case
  8. 6Common Issues and Resolutions
    1. 6.1 Peak Power
    2. 6.2 Occupied Bandwidth
    3. 6.3 Spurious Emissions
      1. 6.3.1 14.4GHz Harmonics
      2. 6.3.2 Suggested Resolution
        1. 6.3.2.1 Hardware Measures
        2. 6.3.2.2 Software Measures
          1. 6.3.2.2.1 APLL Duty Cycling
          2. 6.3.2.2.2 APLL VCO RTRIM Setting in BSS Firmware
    4. 6.4 Overshoot
    5. 6.5 Frequency Stability
      1. 6.5.1 Generating CW Signal
      2. 6.5.2 Frequency Stability Over Temperature and Voltage Range
    6. 6.6 EIRP Spiking and Spectrum Analyzer BW
  9. 7References
  10. 8Revision History

Typical Certification Procedure

AM72 Typical Process of Building and Certifying an
                    EquipmentFigure 2-1 Typical Process of Building and Certifying an Equipment

As shown in Figure 2-1, beginning with the prototype and development phase, equipment must be designed with certification in mind to catch and avoid preventable issues later in the product life cycle. This is especially true when operating in multiple regulatory markets.

When selecting a test house, it is important to consider not only cost, but also the technical proficiency of the staff, the knowledgability of the Telecommunications Board (TCB), and the quality of the overall services provided. It can also be helpful to work with reputable test houses and TCBs in your region, as they will be the easiest to develop a relationship with for asking questions, debugging issues, and planning future projects. It is important to select a test house that you are confident in and able to work with successfully, as once testing begins, you will typically not be able to change to a different test house. This is to prevent "shopping" for a certification.

Sometimes it can be very helpful during a design process to send test samples to your test house for a pre-compliance test, also called a "pre-scan". A pre-scan is a type of initial test performed by a test house that focuses on finding gross emissions from an EUT. It is the first step done as part regular compliance testing and uses peak hold detectors and wide bandwidths to search for any emissions. If emissions are detected and the have more than the minimum margin from the limit, a final scan would not be required. However, just because a spur is observed, doesn't mean that the spur amplitude is as high as it is reported during the pre-scan. Often times it can be lower. Like previously mentioned, a pre-scan can be used to find potentially violating spurs. They are a cost-effective option to help improve board design before final release.

With the pre-scan results in mind, further device verification, validation and production can begin. The samples of the end equipment are then made available for compliance testing.

During the compliance testing, it is important to maintain contact with your test house staff on a regular basis. This can help make sure that you are able to quickly find and resolve problems as they occur, whether those problems are end-equipment knowledge gaps on the part of the TCB or potential compliance failures.

After the completion of the testing phase, the TCB often requires additional documentation to be filed and verified before issuance of the certification. Start communications with the TCB early so as to provide enough time to develop any new documents ahead of time so as to reduce cycle time and thus time to market. Often, this documentation requires signatures from a person with authorization to make statements on behalf of your firm. It is important to align internally to determine who should sign such documents. You must also align with your test house staff on which marking standards your device must follow.

After a positive review, the TCB will assist in filing relevant documents at regulatory agencies. In the case of products being sold in the European common market, this will involve a filing with a Notified Body (NB), for the FCC it is a filing with them from the Telecommunications Certification Board.

After acceptance by the FCC developer can homologate the product with the FCC logos and place the FCC ID on the product. After acceptance by the NB, the developer can add the completed standards to their Declaration of Conformity (DoC) and affix the CE logo to their product. The DoC must be made available to the public.

A DoC for products homologated with the CE marking, typically contains the following at a minimum:

  • Product Name, type, serial or batch number and purpose
  • The name and contact information of the manufacturer
  • A compliance statement that identifies the harmonized legislation and standards used
  • Details of the Notified Body
  • A signature