STDA033 October   2026 MSPM0G3105-Q1 , MSPM0G3106-Q1 , MSPM0G3107-Q1 , MSPM0G3505-Q1 , MSPM0G3506-Q1 , MSPM0G3507-Q1 , MSPM0L1227-Q1 , MSPM0L1228-Q1 , MSPM0L2227-Q1 , MSPM0L2228-Q1 , MSPM33C321A

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
    1.     How Does an Electromagnetic Field Start in a Circuit?
    2.     Near-Field and Far-Field Electromagnetic Fields
  5. 2Common Sources of EMI in Electronic Designs
    1. 2.1 Resistors
      1. 2.1.1 Equivalent Series Inductance (ESL)
      2. 2.1.2 Shunt Capacitance
      3. 2.1.3 Parasitic Capacitance to Ground
    2. 2.2 Capacitors
      1. 2.2.1 Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR)
      2. 2.2.2 Equivalent Series Inductance (ESL)
      3. 2.2.3 Leakage Resistance
      4. 2.2.4 Dielectric Absorption (Soakage)
    3. 2.3 Inductors
      1. 2.3.1 Direct Current Resistance (DCR)
      2. 2.3.2 Parasitic Capacitance
      3. 2.3.3 Core Losses (Magnetic Parasitics)
    4. 2.4 Summary of Discrete Component EMI Considerations
    5. 2.5 Design Deficiencies
    6. 2.6 Sources Specific to MCUs
      1. 2.6.1 Clock Circuits and Oscillators
    7. 2.7 Other Common Sources
      1. 2.7.1 High-Speed Digital Buses
      2. 2.7.2 I/O Output Transitions
      3. 2.7.3 Floating Components
      4. 2.7.4 External Environmental Sources
  6. 3Mitigation Techniques to Minimize EMI and Optimize Board Performance
    1. 3.1 Power Supply Capacitor Selection and Placement
    2. 3.2 Capacitor Placement
    3. 3.3 Layer Stack-Up Optimization
      1. 3.3.1 Good Stack-Up Traits
      2. 3.3.2 Stitching and Shielding Optimization Techniques
    4. 3.4 Trace Routing
    5. 3.5 Passive Pi Filtering
    6. 3.6 Shielding, Grounding, and Cable Boundaries
    7. 3.7 Transient and ESD Current Paths
  7. 4EMC Verification and Troubleshooting
    1. 4.1 Emissions and Immunity as Port Problems
    2. 4.2 Pre-Compliance Measurement Toolkit
    3. 4.3 A Frequency-to-Structure Debug Method
    4. 4.4 Interpreting Common Spectral Signatures
    5. 4.5 Integrated Design Review Checklist
  8. 5Conclusion

3.4 Trace Routing

Spacing reduces capacitive and inductive crosstalk. The common '3W' rule - spacing traces by three times the width - is a useful screen, but stack-up and parallel run length determine actual coupling. Shortening the parallel region is often more effective than applying a fixed spacing everywhere.

Reference continuity is typically more important than corner style. A 90-degree bend creates a small local geometry change, but on ordinary digital boards, the added capacitance is often minor compared with a plane split, connector discontinuity, long stub, or poor termination. Use 45-degree or curved routing for controlled geometry and manufacturability, but do not treat corner shape as the primary EMC control.

  • Trace Separation: Separate analog, digital, and high-power sub-circuits. Keep parallel traces spaced at least three times the trace width to prevent crosstalk.
  • Layer Transitions: If you must change layers on a high-speed trace, place stitching vias next to the signal via to provide a continuous, low impedance return path
  • Avoid 90° Corners: Route traces with 45° angles or curved corners, as sharp 90° bends can cause impedance discontinuities and radiate EMI
MSPM0 MSPM33 Trace Routing Styles Figure 3-8 Trace Routing Styles
Tip: Preserve the return plane, control impedance, eliminate stubs, reduce edge rate, limit parallel coupling, and then refine corner geometry.