STDA033 October   2026 MSPM0G3105-Q1 , MSPM0G3106-Q1 , MSPM0G3107-Q1 , MSPM0G3505-Q1 , MSPM0G3506-Q1 , MSPM0G3507-Q1 , MSPM0L1227-Q1 , MSPM0L1228-Q1 , MSPM0L2227-Q1 , MSPM0L2228-Q1 , MSPM33C321A

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
    1.     How Does an Electromagnetic Field Start in a Circuit?
    2.     Near-Field and Far-Field Electromagnetic Fields
  5. 2Common Sources of EMI in Electronic Designs
    1. 2.1 Resistors
      1. 2.1.1 Equivalent Series Inductance (ESL)
      2. 2.1.2 Shunt Capacitance
      3. 2.1.3 Parasitic Capacitance to Ground
    2. 2.2 Capacitors
      1. 2.2.1 Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR)
      2. 2.2.2 Equivalent Series Inductance (ESL)
      3. 2.2.3 Leakage Resistance
      4. 2.2.4 Dielectric Absorption (Soakage)
    3. 2.3 Inductors
      1. 2.3.1 Direct Current Resistance (DCR)
      2. 2.3.2 Parasitic Capacitance
      3. 2.3.3 Core Losses (Magnetic Parasitics)
    4. 2.4 Summary of Discrete Component EMI Considerations
    5. 2.5 Design Deficiencies
    6. 2.6 Sources Specific to MCUs
      1. 2.6.1 Clock Circuits and Oscillators
    7. 2.7 Other Common Sources
      1. 2.7.1 High-Speed Digital Buses
      2. 2.7.2 I/O Output Transitions
      3. 2.7.3 Floating Components
      4. 2.7.4 External Environmental Sources
  6. 3Mitigation Techniques to Minimize EMI and Optimize Board Performance
    1. 3.1 Power Supply Capacitor Selection and Placement
    2. 3.2 Capacitor Placement
    3. 3.3 Layer Stack-Up Optimization
      1. 3.3.1 Good Stack-Up Traits
      2. 3.3.2 Stitching and Shielding Optimization Techniques
    4. 3.4 Trace Routing
    5. 3.5 Passive Pi Filtering
    6. 3.6 Shielding, Grounding, and Cable Boundaries
    7. 3.7 Transient and ESD Current Paths
  7. 4EMC Verification and Troubleshooting
    1. 4.1 Emissions and Immunity as Port Problems
    2. 4.2 Pre-Compliance Measurement Toolkit
    3. 4.3 A Frequency-to-Structure Debug Method
    4. 4.4 Interpreting Common Spectral Signatures
    5. 4.5 Integrated Design Review Checklist
  8. 5Conclusion

2.3 Inductors

MSPM0 MSPM33 Inductor Parasitic Equivalent Figure 2-3 Inductor Parasitic Equivalent

In an ideal world, an inductor only provides inductance. In reality, a physical inductor is a complex RLC network due to the resistance of the wire and the proximity of the windings.

The DCR of an inductor causes copper loss, its inter-winding capacitance bypasses high-frequency energy, and its magnetic core introduces frequency-dependent and amplitude-dependent loss. Above self-resonance, the component is capacitive. Under high DC bias, the incremental inductance can decrease; near saturation the inductance can collapse, allowing a rapid current rise that worsens both functional stress and EMI.

Ferrite beads are intentionally lossy inductors. The datasheet impedance of ferrite beads often contains a large resistive component in the intended suppression band. That loss converts RF energy to heat and damps resonance, but the bead must also be checked for DC bias derating and interaction with load-side capacitance. Below are the main parasitic components associated with inductors and the respective impact and significance on a given circuit.