TIDUA05B June 2015 – March 2025
The following static angle tests have been done with a ROD480-1024 Sin/Cos Encoder at 1-m and 71-m cable length. Total accuracy measurements with a precision better than 0.003 degrees (10 arc seconds) were not possible due to a lack of a mechanical precise enough encoder test bench. A picture of the test setup is shown in Figure 7-33.
Figure 7-33 TIDA-00176 Test Setup with 70-m Cable (20 m + 50 m) and ROD4800-1024 Sin/Cos
EncoderFigure 7-34 and Figure 7-35 show the measured angle with the ROD480-1024 (1024 line count) over time for a static angle at the 1-m and 70-m cable lengths accordingly. The shaft was not fixed.
Note that the absolute angle for the 1-m and 71-m measurement slightly changed due mechanical vibrations when unscrewing the 1-m cable from the encoder and mounting the 70-m cable instead.
Figure 7-34 System Test, Measured Angle Distribution With ROD480-1024 at 1-m Cable
Length
Figure 7-35 System Test, Measured Angle Distribution With ROD480-1024 at 71-m Cable
LengthThe measured angle with the ROD480-1024 has a noise distribution of ±0.0001 degree (0.36 arc seconds). There is no significant difference between the 1-m and 70-m measurements because the attenuation of the cable was around –1.5 dB at 0 Hz.
To verify the basic accuracy and repeatability of the TIDA-00176 design with a Sin/Cos encoder, the ROD480-1024 Sin/Cos encoder is mechanically coupled with an EnDat 2.2 encoder ROQ437. The ROD480-1024 is connected through a 70-m cable. A picture of the test setup is shown in Figure 7-37.
Figure 7-36 shows the angle difference between the TIDA-00176 connected to a ROD480-1024 Sin/Cos encoder and a ROQ437 EnDat 2.2 absolute encoder, where the absolute angle is read through a Sitara AM437x EnDat 2.2 Master. The absolute angle exhibits a cosine-shape error, which is due to a non-ideal, non-centric coupling of the two shafts with a small run-out.
The encoder was turned multiple times and the angle was captured accordingly to check repeatability too.
As expected, however, the mechanical setup was not accurate and precise enough to draw conclusions on the overall absolute system accuracy. Therefore, the tests conducted in Section 7.3 based on Encoder emulation are more representative to the performance to be expected from the TIDA-00176 reference design.
Figure 7-36 Basic System Accuracy Test With Sin/Cos Encoder at 70-m Cable Length