TIDUA05B June 2015 – March 2025
The first tests showed that the error injected by the dual output signal generator was much worse than the TIDA-00176 accuracy, spoiling completely the purpose of the tests. Noise and error sources for could be "briefly" summarized as:
To reduce the quantization error and noise introduced by the function generator a 1-K to 1-µF LP filter is inserted between the signal generator and the
TIDA-00176 inputs (the 1-K resistor is actually a series of two 500-Ω resistors to keep the network balanced) on the input.
To eliminate gain, offset, phase shift and frequency error between the two channels the following setup was applied: Only one output signal, filtered as described above was applied to both inputs A and B at the encoder connector J8 of the TIDA-00176, hence feeding with the same signal. This will eliminate the limitation of the function generator. Furthermore, any mismatch amongst the two channels of the ADS8354 (and their respective signal conditioning paths) can be better evaluated.
Indeed, the data acquired from the ADS8354 should show (in ideal world) two streams of raw identical data, while any mismatch at this level comes from the mismatch of the two channels, and not from the input itself. This can be also used to calibrate the system, since offset and gain error corrections could be performed to completely balance the A and B channels.
The data has been acquired at a 32-kHz sample rate using the F28069M LaunchPad connected to the TIDA-00176, as outlined in Section 6.
After the ADS8354 channel A and B data has been acquired by the F28069M, the 16-bit raw data has been dumped into an Excel file. Then the raw data for channel B has been exactly phase shifted by
90 degrees. After that the phase has been calculated using the inverse tangent of the raw data A and 90-degree phase shifted raw data B.
This test has been repeated for the 1.0-VPP amplitude and frequencies of 10 Hz up to 500 Hz. The result is shown in the following figures.
Figure 7-25 Phase Error over One Signal Period when 1.0-VPP 10-Hz Input is AppliedWithin one incremental line (one signal period = 360 degrees), the phase error remains well within ±0.02 degrees. This corresponds to an error ±0.02/360 = 0.0055%. With respect to 16-bit resolution, this equals around ±3 LSB only.
The noise distribution is even within ±0.01 (±1.5 LSB). The phase error with the double period is due to a non-ideal 90-degree phase shift between the two signals A and B, as outlined in Section 1.
Note that an error of ±0.02 degrees over one signal period will correspond to a total error of ±10 micro-degrees (0.036 arc seconds) for an encoder with 2000 line counts.
The same tests have been performed in the thermal chamber at nominal 70°C to evaluate the system performance drift and, in particular, the absolute error on the angular position.
Again the double frequency modulation comes from the non-perfect matching (90-degree phase shift, and so on) of the two-input signal.
Figure 7-26 Phase Error at 70°C Over One Signal Period When 1.0-VPP 10-Hz Input is AppliedThe same test was applied with a 0.6-VPP input in which the higher noise / lower SNR conditions are visible:
Figure 7-27 Phase Error at 23°C Ambient Over One Signal Period When 0.6-VPP 10-Hz Input is Applied
Figure 7-28 Phase Error at 70°C Ambient Over One Signal Period (One Revolution/2000) When 0.6-VPP 10-Hz Input is AppliedThe ultra-low drift versus temperature is aligned to the expectation, also because of the characteristics of the selected op-amps and matched resistors used for the analog signal conditioning.