SLYY234 December   2024 AMC0106M05 , AMC0106M25 , AMC0136 , AMC0311D , AMC0311S , AMC0386 , AMC0386-Q1 , AMC1100 , AMC1106M05 , AMC1200 , AMC1200-Q1 , AMC1202 , AMC1203 , AMC1204 , AMC1211-Q1 , AMC1300 , AMC1300B-Q1 , AMC1301 , AMC1301-Q1 , AMC1302-Q1 , AMC1303M2510 , AMC1304L25 , AMC1304M25 , AMC1305M25 , AMC1305M25-Q1 , AMC1306M05 , AMC1306M25 , AMC1311 , AMC1311-Q1 , AMC131M03 , AMC1336 , AMC1336-Q1 , AMC1350 , AMC1350-Q1 , AMC23C12 , AMC3301 , AMC3330 , AMC3330-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Introduction
  3.   Introduction to Isolated Signal Chain
    1.     Comparing Isolated Amplifiers and Isolated Modulators
      1.      Abstract
      2.      Introduction to Isolated Amplifiers
      3.      Introduction to Isolated Modulators
      4.      Performance Comparison Between Isolated Amplifiers and Isolated Modulators
      5.      Isolated Modulators in Traction Inverters
      6.      Isolated Amplifier and Modulator Recommendations
      7.      Conclusion
    2.     TI’s First Isolated Amplifiers With Ultra-Wide Creepage and Clearance
      1.      Application Brief
  4.   Selection Trees
  5.   Current Sensing
    1.     Shunt Resistor Selection for Isolated Data Converters
      1.      17
    2.     Design considerations for isolated current sensing
      1.      19
      2.      Conclusion
      3.      References
      4.      Related Websites
    3.     Isolated Current-Sensing Circuit With ±50-mV Input and Single-Ended Output
      1.      24
    4.     Isolated Current-Sensing Circuit With ±50-mV Input and Differential Output
      1.      26
    5.     Isolated Current-Sensing Circuit With ±250-mV Input Range and Single-Ended Output Voltage
      1.      Design Goals
      2.      Design Description
      3.      Design Notes
      4.      Design Steps
      5.      Design Simulations
      6.      DC Simulation Results
      7.      Closed-Loop AC Simulation Results
      8.      Transient Simulation Results
      9.      Design References
      10.      Design Featured Isolated Amplifier
      11.      Design Alternate Isolated Amplifier
    6.     Isolated current-measurement circuit with ±250-mV input and differential output
      1.      Design Goals
      2.      Design Description
      3.      Design Notes
      4.      Design Steps
      5.      Design Simulations
      6.      DC Simulation Results
      7.      Closed Loop AC Simulation Results
      8.      Transient Simulation Results
      9.      Design References
      10.      Design Featured Op Amp
      11.      Design Alternate Op Amp
    7.     Isolated Overcurrent Protection Circuit
      1.      52
    8.     Interfacing a Differential-Output (Isolated) Amp to a Single-Ended Input ADC
      1.      54
    9.     Utilizing AMC3311 to Power AMC23C11 for Isolated Sensing and Fault Detection
      1.      Application Brief
    10.     Isolated Current-Sensing Circuit With Front-End Gain Stage
      1.      58
    11.     Accuracy Comparison of Isolated Shunt and Closed-Loop Current Sensing
      1.      60
  6.   Voltage Sensing
    1.     Maximizing Power Conversion and Motor Control Efficiency With Isolated Voltage Sensing
      1.      63
      2.      Solutions for high-voltage sensing
      3.      Integrated resistor devices
      4.      Single-ended output devices
      5.      Integrated isolated voltage-sensing use cases
      6.      Conclusion
      7.      Additional resources
    2.     Increased Accuracy and Performance with Integrated High Voltage Resistor Isolated Amplifiers and Modulators
      1.      Abstract
      2.      Introduction
      3.      High Voltage Resistor Isolated Amplifiers and Modulators Advantages
        1.       Space Savings
        2.       Improved Temperature and Lifetime Drift of Integrated HV Resistors
        3.       Accuracy Results
        4.       Fully Integrated Resistors vs. Additional External Resistor Example
        5.       Device Selection Tree and AC/DC Common Use Cases
      4.      Summary
      5.      References
    3.     Isolated Amplifiers With Differential, Single-Ended Fixed Gain and Ratiometric Outputs for Voltage Sensing Applications
      1.      Abstract
      2.      Introduction
      3.      Overview of Differential, Single-Ended Fixed Gain and Ratiometric Outputs
        1.       Isolated Amplifiers with Differential Output
        2.       Isolated Amplifiers With Single-Ended, Fixed-Gain Output
        3.       Isolated Amplifiers With Single-Ended, Ratiometric Output
      4.      Application Examples
        1.       Product Selection Tree
      5.      Summary
      6.      References
    4.     Isolated Voltage-Measurement Circuit With ±250-mV Input and Differential Output
      1.      93
    5.     Split-Tap Connection for Line-to-Line Isolated Voltage Measurement Using AMC3330
      1.      95
    6.     ±12V Voltage Sensing Circuit With an Isolated Amplifier and Pseudo-Differential Input SAR ADC
      1.      97
    7.     ±12-V voltage sensing circuit with an isolated amplifier and differential input SAR ADC
      1.      99
    8.     Isolated Undervoltage and Overvoltage Detection Circuit
      1.      101
    9.     Isolated Zero-Cross Detection Circuit
      1.      103
    10.     ±480V Isolated Voltage-Sensing Circuit With Differential Output
      1.      105
  7.   EMI Performance
    1.     Best in Class Radiated Emissions EMI Performance with Isolated Amplifiers
      1.      Best in Class Radiated Emissions EMI Performance with Isolated Amplifiers
      2.      Introduction
      3.      Current Generation of Texas Instruments Isolated Amplifiers Radiated Emissions Performance
      4.      Previous Generations of Texas Instruments Isolated Amplifiers Radiated Emissions Performance
      5.      Conclusion
      6.      References
    2.     Best Practices to Attenuate AMC3301 Family Radiated Emissions EMI
      1.      Abstract
      2.      Introduction
      3.      Effects of Input Connections on AMC3301 Family Radiated Emissions
      4.      Attenuating AMC3301 Family Radiated Emissions
        1.       Ferrite Beads and Common Mode Chokes
        2.       PCB Schematics and Layout Best Practices for AMC3301 Family
      5.      Using Multiple AMC3301 Devices
        1.       Device Orientation
        2.       PCB Layout Best Practices for Multiple AMC3301
      6.      Conclusion
      7.      AMC3301 Family Table
  8.   End Equipment
    1.     Comparing Shunt- and Hall-Based Isolated Current-Sensing Solutions in HEV/EV
      1.      128
    2.     Design Considerations for Current Sensing in DC EV Charging Applications
      1.      Abstract
      2.      Introduction
        1.       DC Charging Station for Electric Vehicles
        2.       Current-Sensing Technology Selection and Equivalent Model
          1.        Sensing of the Current With Shunt-Based Solution
          2.        Equivalent Model of the Sensing Technology
      3.      Current Sensing in AC/DC Converters
        1.       Basic Hardware and Control Description of AC/DC
          1.        AC Current Control Loops
          2.        DC Voltage Control Loop
        2.       Point A and B – AC/DC AC Phase-Current Sensing
          1.        Impact of Bandwidth
            1.         Steady State Analysis: Fundamental and Zero Crossing Currents
            2.         Transient Analysis: Step Power and Voltage Sag Response
          2.        Impact of Latency
            1.         Fault Analysis: Grid Short-Circuit
          3.        Impact of Gain Error
            1.         Power Disturbance in AC/DC Caused by Gain Error
            2.         AC/DC Response to Power Disturbance Caused by Gain Error
          4.        Impact of Offset
        3.       Point C and D – AC/DC DC Link Current Sensing
          1.        Impact of Bandwidth on Feedforward Performance
          2.        Impact of Latency on Power Switch Protection
          3.        Impact of Gain Error on Power Measurement
            1.         Transient Analysis: Feedforward in Point D
          4.        Impact of Offset
        4.       Summary of Positives and Negatives at Point A, B, C1/2 and D1/2 and Product Suggestions
      4.      Current Sensing in DC/DC Converters
        1.       Basic Operation Principle of Isolated DC/DC Converter With Phase-Shift Control
        2.       Point E, F - DC/DC Current Sensing
          1.        Impact of Bandwidth
          2.        Impact of Gain Error
          3.        Impact of Offset Error
        3.       Point G - DC/DC Tank Current Sensing
        4.       Summary of Sensing Points E, F, and G and Product Suggestions
      5.      Conclusion
      6.      References
    3.     Using isolated comparators for fault detection in electric motor drives
      1.      Introduction
      2.      Introduction to electric motor drives
      3.      Understanding fault events in electric motor drives
      4.      Achieving reliable detection and protection in electric motor drives
      5.      Use case No. 1: Bidirectional in-phase overcurrent detection
      6.      Use case No. 2: DC+ overcurrent detection
      7.      Use case No. 3: DC– overcurrent or short-circuit detection
      8.      Use case No. 4: DC-link (DC+ to DC–) overvoltage and undervoltage detection
      9.      Use case No. 5: IGBT module overtemperature detection
    4.     Discrete DESAT for Opto-Compatible Isolated Gate Driver UCC23513 in Motor Drives
      1.      Abstract
      2.      Introduction
      3.      System Challenge on Isolated Gate Drivers With Integrated DESAT
      4.      System Approach With UCC23513 and AMC23C11
        1.       System Overview and Key Specification
        2.       Schematic Design
          1.        Circuit Schematic
          2.        Configure VCE(DESAT) Threshold and DESAT Bias Current
          3.        DESAT Blanking Time
          4.        DESAT Deglitch Filter
        3.       Reference PCB Layout
      5.      Simulation and Test Results
        1.       Simulation Circuit and Results
          1.        Simulation Circuit
          2.        Simulation Results
        2.       Test Results With 3-Phase IGBT Inverter
          1.        Brake IGBT Test
          2.        Test Results on a 3-Phase Inverter With Phase to Phase Short
      6.      Summary
      7.      References
    5.     Isolated voltage sensing in AC motor drives
      1.      Introduction
      2.      Conclusion
      3.      References
    6.     Achieving High-Performance Isolated Current and Voltage Sensing in Server PSUs
      1.      Application Brief
  9.   Additional Reference Designs/Circuits
    1.     Designing a Bootstrap Charge-Pump Power Supply for an Isolated Amplifier
      1.      Abstract
      2.      Introduction
      3.      Bootstrap Power Supply Design
        1.       Selection of Charge Pump Capacitor
        2.       Simulation in TINA-TI
        3.       Hardware Test with AMC1311-Q1
      4.      Summary
      5.      Reference
    2.     Clock Edge Delay Compensation With Isolated Modulators Digital Interface to MCUs
      1.      Abstract
      2.      Introduction
      3.      Design Challenge With Digital Interface Timing Specifications
      4.      Design Approach With Clock Edge Delay Compensation
        1.       Clock Signal Compensation With Software Configurable Phase Delay
        2.       Clock Signal Compensation With Hardware Configurable Phase Delay
        3.       Clock Signal Compensation by Clock Return
        4.       Clock Signal Compensation by Clock Inversion at the MCU
      5.      Test and Validation
        1.       Test Equipment and Software
        2.       Testing of Clock Signal Compensation With Software Configurable Phase Delay
          1.        Test Setup
          2.        Test Measurement Results
        3.       Testing of Clock Signal Compensation by Clock Inversion at MCU
          1.        Test Setup
          2.        Test Measurement Results
            1.         Test Result – No Clock Inversion of Clock Input at GPIO123
            2.         Test Result – Clock Inversion of Clock Input at GPIO123
        4.       Digital Interface Timing Validation by Calculation Tool
          1.        Digital Interface With No Compensation Method
          2.        Commonly Used Method - Reduction of the Clock Frequency
          3.        Clock Edge Compensation With Software Configurable Phase Delay
      6.      Conclusion
      7.      References
    3.     Utilizing AMC3311 to Power AMC23C11 for Isolated Sensing and Fault Detection
      1.      Application Brief
Steady State Analysis: Fundamental and Zero Crossing Currents

In this analysis, grid currents are controlled in the switching nodes (point-B) and a typical profile of the controlled currents are shown in Figure 79. Figure 79 shows that the three currents and the three voltages are in phase, allowing an active power conversion from the DC toward the AC grid (11 kW toward the grid). The zoomed-in portion in Figure 80 shows the current in the switching node is composed of a fundamental component at 50 Hz, plus an important current ripple amplitude caused by the switching of a 2-level converter.

 Grid Voltages and Currents of an AC/DC Converter Working at the Nominal Load of 11 kW Grid Voltages and Currents of an AC/DC Converter Working at the Nominal Load of 11 kWFigure 79 Grid Voltages and Currents of an AC/DC Converter Working at the Nominal Load of 11 kW

Figure 80 is a zoomed-in view of Figure 79 which shows the rectifier current plus the average current having a fundamental harmonic of 50 Hz.

 Zoomed in Portion at t = 0s (Span 100μs)Figure 80 Zoomed in Portion at t = 0s (Span 100μs)

Power conversion between AC and DC is achieved by means of the currents controlled at the grid frequency. Therefore, the measurement of the fundamental harmonic of the current (for example, I_L1_B_AVG) with correct amplitude and no important phase-delay needs to be delivered to the MCU. The 50-Hz or 60-Hz component can be derived by means of sampling technique as synchronous sampling, average control, and so forth. By adopting these techniques, no important phase delay in the digital control loop is introduced, allowing a faster response of the loop12. Conversely, current sensors cannot be considered an ideal choice since current sensors have a bandwidth limitation. The current sensors can lead to important phase-delay and amplitude errors present at the MCU terminals. This error can be reflected in an error of the active and reactive powers exchanged and are expressed as in Equation 47.

Equation 42. φ =atan(2π fe τ)

where

  • φ is the phase delay between the measured current and the real current
  • fe is the electrical frequency of the measured signal, which is equal for this application to 50 Hz or 60 Hz
  • τ is the constant time of the low-pass filter behavior presented by the measurement chain

By using Equation 47, with a cutoff frequency higher than a hundred times the grid electrical frequency (6 kHz when having a grid at 60 Hz) a phase-angle delay lower than 0.6°can be achieved. This phase shift results in 50 Hz or 60 Hz to a negligible error of the active and reactive controlled power. The component to which the power conversion occurs, a 6-kHz bandwidth, is more than sufficient for controlling grid currents.

In general, 50 Hz or 60 Hz are not the only component to be controlled but there are higher frequency components in the grid currents introduced by the dead time in the power stage, leading to a significant increase of the THD. The high frequency component must be captured by the measurement such that the MCU can correct them, allowing a software cancellation. Increasing the dead time leads to higher distortions, in particular at the zero crossing of the current (at 11 ms) as shown in Figure 81. In this picture, current waveforms in point A drained by an AC/DC converter working at 11 kW are shown when the dead time of the controller is changed. The top graph shows the current waveform with 250-ns dead time, the bottom graph with 1.5-μs dead time.

 Current Drained From the PCC When a Dead Time of 250ns and 1.5μs are Implemented (50-Hz Operation) Current Drained From the PCC When a Dead Time of 250ns and 1.5μs are Implemented (50-Hz Operation)Figure 81 Current Drained From the PCC When a Dead Time of 250ns and 1.5μs are Implemented (50-Hz Operation)

Excessive dead time can lead to significant THD which exceeds the limits set by the standards. To comply with the standards, either a large output filter is needed or adequate software control must be provided. Multiple control techniques were developed with the aim to compensate this disturbance; however, all these options require sufficient bandwidth of the current sensor. To determine the minimum bandwidth requirements, an fast Fourier transform (FFT) transformation of the current waveform is performed to analyzed the frequency content of the disturbance.

Figure 82 shows the results of FFTs of the currents in the PCC when full power is required by the grid.

 FFT of the Currents Depicted in Figure 2-6 Plus Zoomed Portion (50 Hz) FFT of the Currents Depicted in Figure 2-6 Plus Zoomed Portion (50 Hz)Figure 82 FFT of the Currents Depicted in Figure 2-6 Plus Zoomed Portion (50 Hz)

The most important frequencies to be compensated in Figure 82 are the 5th, 13th, and 17th harmonics, leading to 250 Hz, 650 Hz, and 850 Hz when the grid is working at 50 Hz. Correspondingly, when the grid operates at 60 Hz the frequencies are 300 Hz, 780 Hz, and 1020 Hz. By applying Equation 47 to the new frequencies, a minimum bandwidth from the current sensing stage of 102 kHz needs to be provided to make sure a proper compensation of the harmonics.

In conclusion, from steady-state analysis, a minimum bandwidth of 102 kHz when having a 60-Hz grid is necessary to improve the total harmonic distortion of the currents when an important dead-time is present in the PFC stage. When the grid is operating at 50 Hz, the minimum bandwidth can be scaled down to 95 kHz. The current sensor bandwidth is required in either point A or B depending where the currents are controlled because harmonic content generated by dead time is the same in both the measurement points. The reason is due to the fact that the EMI filter (see Figure 76) is optimized for much higher frequency content; therefore, no important mitigation can be achieved at low frequency.